Cargando…
Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain
BACKGROUND: Reducing meat consumption could bring health and environmental benefits, but there is little research to date on effective interventions to achieve this. A non-randomised controlled intervention study was used to evaluate whether prominent positioning of meat-free products in the meat ai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34264943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003715 |
_version_ | 1783730771210534912 |
---|---|
author | Piernas, Carmen Cook, Brian Stevens, Richard Stewart, Cristina Hollowell, Jennifer Scarborough, Peter Jebb, Susan A. |
author_facet | Piernas, Carmen Cook, Brian Stevens, Richard Stewart, Cristina Hollowell, Jennifer Scarborough, Peter Jebb, Susan A. |
author_sort | Piernas, Carmen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reducing meat consumption could bring health and environmental benefits, but there is little research to date on effective interventions to achieve this. A non-randomised controlled intervention study was used to evaluate whether prominent positioning of meat-free products in the meat aisle was associated with a change in weekly mean sales of meat and meat-free products. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Weekly sales data were obtained from 108 stores: 20 intervention stores that moved a selection of 26 meat-free products into a newly created meat-free bay within the meat aisle and 88 matched control stores. The primary outcome analysis used a hierarchical negative binomial model to compare changes in weekly sales (units) of meat products sold in intervention versus control stores during the main intervention period (Phase I: February 2019 to April 2019). Interrupted time series analysis was also used to evaluate the effects of the Phase I intervention. Moreover, 8 of the 20 stores enhanced the intervention from August 2019 onwards (Phase II intervention) by adding a second bay of meat-free products into the meat aisle, which was evaluated following the same analytical methods. During the Phase I intervention, sales of meat products (units/store/week) decreased in intervention (approximately −6%) and control stores (−5%) without significant differences (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.01 [95% CI 0.95–1.07]. Sales of meat-free products increased significantly more in the intervention (+31%) compared to the control stores (+6%; IRR 1.43 [95% CI 1.30–1.57]), mostly due to increased sales of meat-free burgers, mince, and sausages. Consistent results were observed in interrupted time series analyses where the effect of the Phase II intervention was significant in intervention versus control stores. CONCLUSIONS: Prominent positioning of meat-free products into the meat aisle in a supermarket was not effective in reducing sales of meat products, but successfully increased sales of meat-free alternatives in the longer term. A preregistered protocol (https://osf.io/qmz3a/) was completed and fully available before data analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8321099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83210992021-07-31 Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain Piernas, Carmen Cook, Brian Stevens, Richard Stewart, Cristina Hollowell, Jennifer Scarborough, Peter Jebb, Susan A. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Reducing meat consumption could bring health and environmental benefits, but there is little research to date on effective interventions to achieve this. A non-randomised controlled intervention study was used to evaluate whether prominent positioning of meat-free products in the meat aisle was associated with a change in weekly mean sales of meat and meat-free products. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Weekly sales data were obtained from 108 stores: 20 intervention stores that moved a selection of 26 meat-free products into a newly created meat-free bay within the meat aisle and 88 matched control stores. The primary outcome analysis used a hierarchical negative binomial model to compare changes in weekly sales (units) of meat products sold in intervention versus control stores during the main intervention period (Phase I: February 2019 to April 2019). Interrupted time series analysis was also used to evaluate the effects of the Phase I intervention. Moreover, 8 of the 20 stores enhanced the intervention from August 2019 onwards (Phase II intervention) by adding a second bay of meat-free products into the meat aisle, which was evaluated following the same analytical methods. During the Phase I intervention, sales of meat products (units/store/week) decreased in intervention (approximately −6%) and control stores (−5%) without significant differences (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.01 [95% CI 0.95–1.07]. Sales of meat-free products increased significantly more in the intervention (+31%) compared to the control stores (+6%; IRR 1.43 [95% CI 1.30–1.57]), mostly due to increased sales of meat-free burgers, mince, and sausages. Consistent results were observed in interrupted time series analyses where the effect of the Phase II intervention was significant in intervention versus control stores. CONCLUSIONS: Prominent positioning of meat-free products into the meat aisle in a supermarket was not effective in reducing sales of meat products, but successfully increased sales of meat-free alternatives in the longer term. A preregistered protocol (https://osf.io/qmz3a/) was completed and fully available before data analysis. Public Library of Science 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8321099/ /pubmed/34264943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003715 Text en © 2021 Piernas et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Piernas, Carmen Cook, Brian Stevens, Richard Stewart, Cristina Hollowell, Jennifer Scarborough, Peter Jebb, Susan A. Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain |
title | Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain |
title_full | Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain |
title_fullStr | Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain |
title_short | Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain |
title_sort | estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: a non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large uk supermarket chain |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34264943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT piernascarmen estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain AT cookbrian estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain AT stevensrichard estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain AT stewartcristina estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain AT hollowelljennifer estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain AT scarboroughpeter estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain AT jebbsusana estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain |