Cargando…

Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain

BACKGROUND: Reducing meat consumption could bring health and environmental benefits, but there is little research to date on effective interventions to achieve this. A non-randomised controlled intervention study was used to evaluate whether prominent positioning of meat-free products in the meat ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piernas, Carmen, Cook, Brian, Stevens, Richard, Stewart, Cristina, Hollowell, Jennifer, Scarborough, Peter, Jebb, Susan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34264943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003715
_version_ 1783730771210534912
author Piernas, Carmen
Cook, Brian
Stevens, Richard
Stewart, Cristina
Hollowell, Jennifer
Scarborough, Peter
Jebb, Susan A.
author_facet Piernas, Carmen
Cook, Brian
Stevens, Richard
Stewart, Cristina
Hollowell, Jennifer
Scarborough, Peter
Jebb, Susan A.
author_sort Piernas, Carmen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reducing meat consumption could bring health and environmental benefits, but there is little research to date on effective interventions to achieve this. A non-randomised controlled intervention study was used to evaluate whether prominent positioning of meat-free products in the meat aisle was associated with a change in weekly mean sales of meat and meat-free products. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Weekly sales data were obtained from 108 stores: 20 intervention stores that moved a selection of 26 meat-free products into a newly created meat-free bay within the meat aisle and 88 matched control stores. The primary outcome analysis used a hierarchical negative binomial model to compare changes in weekly sales (units) of meat products sold in intervention versus control stores during the main intervention period (Phase I: February 2019 to April 2019). Interrupted time series analysis was also used to evaluate the effects of the Phase I intervention. Moreover, 8 of the 20 stores enhanced the intervention from August 2019 onwards (Phase II intervention) by adding a second bay of meat-free products into the meat aisle, which was evaluated following the same analytical methods. During the Phase I intervention, sales of meat products (units/store/week) decreased in intervention (approximately −6%) and control stores (−5%) without significant differences (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.01 [95% CI 0.95–1.07]. Sales of meat-free products increased significantly more in the intervention (+31%) compared to the control stores (+6%; IRR 1.43 [95% CI 1.30–1.57]), mostly due to increased sales of meat-free burgers, mince, and sausages. Consistent results were observed in interrupted time series analyses where the effect of the Phase II intervention was significant in intervention versus control stores. CONCLUSIONS: Prominent positioning of meat-free products into the meat aisle in a supermarket was not effective in reducing sales of meat products, but successfully increased sales of meat-free alternatives in the longer term. A preregistered protocol (https://osf.io/qmz3a/) was completed and fully available before data analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8321099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83210992021-07-31 Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain Piernas, Carmen Cook, Brian Stevens, Richard Stewart, Cristina Hollowell, Jennifer Scarborough, Peter Jebb, Susan A. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Reducing meat consumption could bring health and environmental benefits, but there is little research to date on effective interventions to achieve this. A non-randomised controlled intervention study was used to evaluate whether prominent positioning of meat-free products in the meat aisle was associated with a change in weekly mean sales of meat and meat-free products. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Weekly sales data were obtained from 108 stores: 20 intervention stores that moved a selection of 26 meat-free products into a newly created meat-free bay within the meat aisle and 88 matched control stores. The primary outcome analysis used a hierarchical negative binomial model to compare changes in weekly sales (units) of meat products sold in intervention versus control stores during the main intervention period (Phase I: February 2019 to April 2019). Interrupted time series analysis was also used to evaluate the effects of the Phase I intervention. Moreover, 8 of the 20 stores enhanced the intervention from August 2019 onwards (Phase II intervention) by adding a second bay of meat-free products into the meat aisle, which was evaluated following the same analytical methods. During the Phase I intervention, sales of meat products (units/store/week) decreased in intervention (approximately −6%) and control stores (−5%) without significant differences (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.01 [95% CI 0.95–1.07]. Sales of meat-free products increased significantly more in the intervention (+31%) compared to the control stores (+6%; IRR 1.43 [95% CI 1.30–1.57]), mostly due to increased sales of meat-free burgers, mince, and sausages. Consistent results were observed in interrupted time series analyses where the effect of the Phase II intervention was significant in intervention versus control stores. CONCLUSIONS: Prominent positioning of meat-free products into the meat aisle in a supermarket was not effective in reducing sales of meat products, but successfully increased sales of meat-free alternatives in the longer term. A preregistered protocol (https://osf.io/qmz3a/) was completed and fully available before data analysis. Public Library of Science 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8321099/ /pubmed/34264943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003715 Text en © 2021 Piernas et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Piernas, Carmen
Cook, Brian
Stevens, Richard
Stewart, Cristina
Hollowell, Jennifer
Scarborough, Peter
Jebb, Susan A.
Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain
title Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain
title_full Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain
title_fullStr Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain
title_short Estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: A non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large UK supermarket chain
title_sort estimating the effect of moving meat-free products to the meat aisle on sales of meat and meat-free products: a non-randomised controlled intervention study in a large uk supermarket chain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34264943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003715
work_keys_str_mv AT piernascarmen estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain
AT cookbrian estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain
AT stevensrichard estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain
AT stewartcristina estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain
AT hollowelljennifer estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain
AT scarboroughpeter estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain
AT jebbsusana estimatingtheeffectofmovingmeatfreeproductstothemeataisleonsalesofmeatandmeatfreeproductsanonrandomisedcontrolledinterventionstudyinalargeuksupermarketchain