Cargando…
Quantitative Comparison of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Methods for Low-Dose and Sparse-Angle CT Applications
The reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) images is an active area of research. Following the rise of deep learning methods, many data-driven models have been proposed in recent years. In this work, we present the results of a data challenge that we organized, bringing together algorithm expert...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7030044 |
_version_ | 1783730823652966400 |
---|---|
author | Leuschner, Johannes Schmidt, Maximilian Ganguly, Poulami Somanya Andriiashen, Vladyslav Coban, Sophia Bethany Denker, Alexander Bauer, Dominik Hadjifaradji, Amir Batenburg, Kees Joost Maass, Peter van Eijnatten, Maureen |
author_facet | Leuschner, Johannes Schmidt, Maximilian Ganguly, Poulami Somanya Andriiashen, Vladyslav Coban, Sophia Bethany Denker, Alexander Bauer, Dominik Hadjifaradji, Amir Batenburg, Kees Joost Maass, Peter van Eijnatten, Maureen |
author_sort | Leuschner, Johannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | The reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) images is an active area of research. Following the rise of deep learning methods, many data-driven models have been proposed in recent years. In this work, we present the results of a data challenge that we organized, bringing together algorithm experts from different institutes to jointly work on quantitative evaluation of several data-driven methods on two large, public datasets during a ten day sprint. We focus on two applications of CT, namely, low-dose CT and sparse-angle CT. This enables us to fairly compare different methods using standardized settings. As a general result, we observe that the deep learning-based methods are able to improve the reconstruction quality metrics in both CT applications while the top performing methods show only minor differences in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM). We further discuss a number of other important criteria that should be taken into account when selecting a method, such as the availability of training data, the knowledge of the physical measurement model and the reconstruction speed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8321320 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83213202021-08-26 Quantitative Comparison of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Methods for Low-Dose and Sparse-Angle CT Applications Leuschner, Johannes Schmidt, Maximilian Ganguly, Poulami Somanya Andriiashen, Vladyslav Coban, Sophia Bethany Denker, Alexander Bauer, Dominik Hadjifaradji, Amir Batenburg, Kees Joost Maass, Peter van Eijnatten, Maureen J Imaging Article The reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) images is an active area of research. Following the rise of deep learning methods, many data-driven models have been proposed in recent years. In this work, we present the results of a data challenge that we organized, bringing together algorithm experts from different institutes to jointly work on quantitative evaluation of several data-driven methods on two large, public datasets during a ten day sprint. We focus on two applications of CT, namely, low-dose CT and sparse-angle CT. This enables us to fairly compare different methods using standardized settings. As a general result, we observe that the deep learning-based methods are able to improve the reconstruction quality metrics in both CT applications while the top performing methods show only minor differences in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM). We further discuss a number of other important criteria that should be taken into account when selecting a method, such as the availability of training data, the knowledge of the physical measurement model and the reconstruction speed. MDPI 2021-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8321320/ /pubmed/34460700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7030044 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Leuschner, Johannes Schmidt, Maximilian Ganguly, Poulami Somanya Andriiashen, Vladyslav Coban, Sophia Bethany Denker, Alexander Bauer, Dominik Hadjifaradji, Amir Batenburg, Kees Joost Maass, Peter van Eijnatten, Maureen Quantitative Comparison of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Methods for Low-Dose and Sparse-Angle CT Applications |
title | Quantitative Comparison of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Methods for Low-Dose and Sparse-Angle CT Applications |
title_full | Quantitative Comparison of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Methods for Low-Dose and Sparse-Angle CT Applications |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Comparison of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Methods for Low-Dose and Sparse-Angle CT Applications |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Comparison of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Methods for Low-Dose and Sparse-Angle CT Applications |
title_short | Quantitative Comparison of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Methods for Low-Dose and Sparse-Angle CT Applications |
title_sort | quantitative comparison of deep learning-based image reconstruction methods for low-dose and sparse-angle ct applications |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7030044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leuschnerjohannes quantitativecomparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionmethodsforlowdoseandsparseanglectapplications AT schmidtmaximilian quantitativecomparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionmethodsforlowdoseandsparseanglectapplications AT gangulypoulamisomanya quantitativecomparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionmethodsforlowdoseandsparseanglectapplications AT andriiashenvladyslav quantitativecomparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionmethodsforlowdoseandsparseanglectapplications AT cobansophiabethany quantitativecomparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionmethodsforlowdoseandsparseanglectapplications AT denkeralexander quantitativecomparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionmethodsforlowdoseandsparseanglectapplications AT bauerdominik quantitativecomparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionmethodsforlowdoseandsparseanglectapplications AT hadjifaradjiamir quantitativecomparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionmethodsforlowdoseandsparseanglectapplications AT batenburgkeesjoost quantitativecomparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionmethodsforlowdoseandsparseanglectapplications AT maasspeter quantitativecomparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionmethodsforlowdoseandsparseanglectapplications AT vaneijnattenmaureen quantitativecomparisonofdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionmethodsforlowdoseandsparseanglectapplications |