Cargando…

Chest X-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Chest X-ray (CXR) is the first-line investigation for lung cancer in many healthcare systems. An understanding of the consequences of false-negative CXRs on time to diagnosis, stage, and survival is limited. AIM: To determine the sensitivity of CXR for lung cancer and to compare stage at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bradley, Stephen H, Bhartia, Bobby SK, Callister, Matthew EJ, Hamilton, William T, Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding, Kennedy, Martyn PT, Mounce, Luke TA, Shinkins, Bethany, Wheatstone, Pete, Neal, Richard D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.1099
_version_ 1783730849941815296
author Bradley, Stephen H
Bhartia, Bobby SK
Callister, Matthew EJ
Hamilton, William T
Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding
Kennedy, Martyn PT
Mounce, Luke TA
Shinkins, Bethany
Wheatstone, Pete
Neal, Richard D
author_facet Bradley, Stephen H
Bhartia, Bobby SK
Callister, Matthew EJ
Hamilton, William T
Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding
Kennedy, Martyn PT
Mounce, Luke TA
Shinkins, Bethany
Wheatstone, Pete
Neal, Richard D
author_sort Bradley, Stephen H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chest X-ray (CXR) is the first-line investigation for lung cancer in many healthcare systems. An understanding of the consequences of false-negative CXRs on time to diagnosis, stage, and survival is limited. AIM: To determine the sensitivity of CXR for lung cancer and to compare stage at diagnosis, time to diagnosis, and survival between those with CXR that detected, or did not detect, lung cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective observational study using routinely collected healthcare data. METHOD: All patients diagnosed with lung cancer in Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust during 2008–2015 who had a GP-requested CXR in the year before diagnosis were categorised based on the result of the earliest CXR performed in that period. The sensitivity of CXR was calculated and analyses were performed with respect to time to diagnosis, survival, and stage at diagnosis. RESULTS: CXR was negative for 17.7% of patients (n = 376/2129). Median time from initial CXR to diagnosis was 43 days for those with a positive CXR and 204 days for those with a negative CXR. Of those with a positive CXR, 29.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 27.9% to 31.8%) were diagnosed at stage I or II, compared with 33.5% (95% CI = 28.8% to 38.6%) with a negative CXR. CONCLUSION: GPs should consider lung cancer in patients with persistent symptoms even when CXR is negative. Despite longer duration to diagnosis for those with false-negative CXRs, there was no evidence of an adverse impact on stage at diagnosis or survival; however, this comparison is likely to be affected by confounding variables.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8321437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83214372021-08-12 Chest X-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: a retrospective observational study Bradley, Stephen H Bhartia, Bobby SK Callister, Matthew EJ Hamilton, William T Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding Kennedy, Martyn PT Mounce, Luke TA Shinkins, Bethany Wheatstone, Pete Neal, Richard D Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Chest X-ray (CXR) is the first-line investigation for lung cancer in many healthcare systems. An understanding of the consequences of false-negative CXRs on time to diagnosis, stage, and survival is limited. AIM: To determine the sensitivity of CXR for lung cancer and to compare stage at diagnosis, time to diagnosis, and survival between those with CXR that detected, or did not detect, lung cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective observational study using routinely collected healthcare data. METHOD: All patients diagnosed with lung cancer in Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust during 2008–2015 who had a GP-requested CXR in the year before diagnosis were categorised based on the result of the earliest CXR performed in that period. The sensitivity of CXR was calculated and analyses were performed with respect to time to diagnosis, survival, and stage at diagnosis. RESULTS: CXR was negative for 17.7% of patients (n = 376/2129). Median time from initial CXR to diagnosis was 43 days for those with a positive CXR and 204 days for those with a negative CXR. Of those with a positive CXR, 29.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 27.9% to 31.8%) were diagnosed at stage I or II, compared with 33.5% (95% CI = 28.8% to 38.6%) with a negative CXR. CONCLUSION: GPs should consider lung cancer in patients with persistent symptoms even when CXR is negative. Despite longer duration to diagnosis for those with false-negative CXRs, there was no evidence of an adverse impact on stage at diagnosis or survival; however, this comparison is likely to be affected by confounding variables. Royal College of General Practitioners 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8321437/ /pubmed/33875450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.1099 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Research
Bradley, Stephen H
Bhartia, Bobby SK
Callister, Matthew EJ
Hamilton, William T
Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding
Kennedy, Martyn PT
Mounce, Luke TA
Shinkins, Bethany
Wheatstone, Pete
Neal, Richard D
Chest X-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: a retrospective observational study
title Chest X-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: a retrospective observational study
title_full Chest X-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: a retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Chest X-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: a retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Chest X-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: a retrospective observational study
title_short Chest X-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: a retrospective observational study
title_sort chest x-ray sensitivity and lung cancer outcomes: a retrospective observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2020.1099
work_keys_str_mv AT bradleystephenh chestxraysensitivityandlungcanceroutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT bhartiabobbysk chestxraysensitivityandlungcanceroutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT callistermatthewej chestxraysensitivityandlungcanceroutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hamiltonwilliamt chestxraysensitivityandlungcanceroutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT hattonnathaniellukefielding chestxraysensitivityandlungcanceroutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kennedymartynpt chestxraysensitivityandlungcanceroutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT mounceluketa chestxraysensitivityandlungcanceroutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT shinkinsbethany chestxraysensitivityandlungcanceroutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT wheatstonepete chestxraysensitivityandlungcanceroutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT nealrichardd chestxraysensitivityandlungcanceroutcomesaretrospectiveobservationalstudy