Cargando…
High uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate our transvaginal high uterosacral ligament (HUL) hysteropexy technique as an alternative mesh-free uterine-preserving pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair approach and present our institutional outcomes. Concurrent hysterectomy with POP repair is controversial as uterine-pres...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33848087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0384 |
_version_ | 1783730859521605632 |
---|---|
author | Kachroo, Naveen Raffee, Samantha Elshatanoufy, Solafa Atiemo, Humphrey |
author_facet | Kachroo, Naveen Raffee, Samantha Elshatanoufy, Solafa Atiemo, Humphrey |
author_sort | Kachroo, Naveen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate our transvaginal high uterosacral ligament (HUL) hysteropexy technique as an alternative mesh-free uterine-preserving pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair approach and present our institutional outcomes. Concurrent hysterectomy with POP repair is controversial as uterine-preserving techniques may beneficially allow fertility, body image and sexual function preservation (1, 2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This video illustrates a step-by-step sequence of our HUL hysteropexy technique in a symptomatic Stage III POP patient. Retrospective single-institution, single-surgeon analysis of patients treated by either HUL hysteropexy or hysterectomy with HUL suspension for symptomatic prolapse was performed with minimum 2 years of follow-up. Patient demographics, operative characteristics, pre and post-operative POP-Q evaluation, American Urological Association Symptom scores (AUASS) and post-operative Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) were compared. RESULTS: Surgery time was 3 hours 24 minutes. No immediate/early complications were noted, with successful repair on follow-up. Outcomes of 18 patients (10 HUL hysteropexy, 8 hysterectomy and HUL suspension) were assessed (Supplemental Table). The only baseline difference was a lower body mass index in the HUL hysteropexy cohort (25.8 vs. 35.8kg/m2, p=0.008). In the HUL hysteropexy cohort, blood loss (mean: 58 vs. 205ml, p=0.00086) and operative time (190.4 vs. 279.1minutes, p=0.0021) were significantly reduced. There was no difference in post-operative AUASS, POP-Q or PFDI-20 at 2 years. CONCLUSION: We present our HUL hysteropexy technique. Although limited by sample size and retrospective design, resulted in significantly reduced blood loss and operative time with comparable post-operative 2 year outcomes to non-uterine-preserving techniques. In our opinion, HUL hysteropexy is a safe, durable POP management option for women without significant endometrial pathology risk factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8321477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83214772021-08-06 High uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse Kachroo, Naveen Raffee, Samantha Elshatanoufy, Solafa Atiemo, Humphrey Int Braz J Urol Video Section OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate our transvaginal high uterosacral ligament (HUL) hysteropexy technique as an alternative mesh-free uterine-preserving pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair approach and present our institutional outcomes. Concurrent hysterectomy with POP repair is controversial as uterine-preserving techniques may beneficially allow fertility, body image and sexual function preservation (1, 2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This video illustrates a step-by-step sequence of our HUL hysteropexy technique in a symptomatic Stage III POP patient. Retrospective single-institution, single-surgeon analysis of patients treated by either HUL hysteropexy or hysterectomy with HUL suspension for symptomatic prolapse was performed with minimum 2 years of follow-up. Patient demographics, operative characteristics, pre and post-operative POP-Q evaluation, American Urological Association Symptom scores (AUASS) and post-operative Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) were compared. RESULTS: Surgery time was 3 hours 24 minutes. No immediate/early complications were noted, with successful repair on follow-up. Outcomes of 18 patients (10 HUL hysteropexy, 8 hysterectomy and HUL suspension) were assessed (Supplemental Table). The only baseline difference was a lower body mass index in the HUL hysteropexy cohort (25.8 vs. 35.8kg/m2, p=0.008). In the HUL hysteropexy cohort, blood loss (mean: 58 vs. 205ml, p=0.00086) and operative time (190.4 vs. 279.1minutes, p=0.0021) were significantly reduced. There was no difference in post-operative AUASS, POP-Q or PFDI-20 at 2 years. CONCLUSION: We present our HUL hysteropexy technique. Although limited by sample size and retrospective design, resulted in significantly reduced blood loss and operative time with comparable post-operative 2 year outcomes to non-uterine-preserving techniques. In our opinion, HUL hysteropexy is a safe, durable POP management option for women without significant endometrial pathology risk factors. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2021-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8321477/ /pubmed/33848087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0384 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Video Section Kachroo, Naveen Raffee, Samantha Elshatanoufy, Solafa Atiemo, Humphrey High uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse |
title | High uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse |
title_full | High uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse |
title_fullStr | High uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse |
title_full_unstemmed | High uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse |
title_short | High uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse |
title_sort | high uterosacral ligament hysteropexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse |
topic | Video Section |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33848087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kachroonaveen highuterosacralligamenthysteropexyforthemanagementofpelvicorganprolapse AT raffeesamantha highuterosacralligamenthysteropexyforthemanagementofpelvicorganprolapse AT elshatanoufysolafa highuterosacralligamenthysteropexyforthemanagementofpelvicorganprolapse AT atiemohumphrey highuterosacralligamenthysteropexyforthemanagementofpelvicorganprolapse |