Cargando…

Distinct mechanisms mediate X chromosome dosage compensation in Anopheles and Drosophila

Sex chromosomes induce potentially deleterious gene expression imbalances that are frequently corrected by dosage compensation (DC). Three distinct molecular strategies to achieve DC have been previously described in nematodes, fruit flies, and mammals. Is this a consequence of distinct genomes, fun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keller Valsecchi, Claudia Isabelle, Marois, Eric, Basilicata, M Felicia, Georgiev, Plamen, Akhtar, Asifa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Life Science Alliance LLC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34266874
http://dx.doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202000996
_version_ 1783730903301750784
author Keller Valsecchi, Claudia Isabelle
Marois, Eric
Basilicata, M Felicia
Georgiev, Plamen
Akhtar, Asifa
author_facet Keller Valsecchi, Claudia Isabelle
Marois, Eric
Basilicata, M Felicia
Georgiev, Plamen
Akhtar, Asifa
author_sort Keller Valsecchi, Claudia Isabelle
collection PubMed
description Sex chromosomes induce potentially deleterious gene expression imbalances that are frequently corrected by dosage compensation (DC). Three distinct molecular strategies to achieve DC have been previously described in nematodes, fruit flies, and mammals. Is this a consequence of distinct genomes, functional or ecological constraints, or random initial commitment to an evolutionary trajectory? Here, we study DC in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. The Anopheles and Drosophila X chromosomes evolved independently but share a high degree of homology. We find that Anopheles achieves DC by a mechanism distinct from the Drosophila MSL complex–histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation pathway. CRISPR knockout of Anopheles msl-2 leads to embryonic lethality in both sexes. Transcriptome analyses indicate that this phenotype is not a consequence of defective X chromosome DC. By immunofluorescence and ChIP, H4K16ac does not preferentially enrich on the male X. Instead, the mosquito MSL pathway regulates conserved developmental genes. We conclude that a novel mechanism confers X chromosome up-regulation in Anopheles. Our findings highlight the pluralism of gene-dosage buffering mechanisms even under similar genomic and functional constraints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8321682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Life Science Alliance LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83216822021-08-04 Distinct mechanisms mediate X chromosome dosage compensation in Anopheles and Drosophila Keller Valsecchi, Claudia Isabelle Marois, Eric Basilicata, M Felicia Georgiev, Plamen Akhtar, Asifa Life Sci Alliance Research Articles Sex chromosomes induce potentially deleterious gene expression imbalances that are frequently corrected by dosage compensation (DC). Three distinct molecular strategies to achieve DC have been previously described in nematodes, fruit flies, and mammals. Is this a consequence of distinct genomes, functional or ecological constraints, or random initial commitment to an evolutionary trajectory? Here, we study DC in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. The Anopheles and Drosophila X chromosomes evolved independently but share a high degree of homology. We find that Anopheles achieves DC by a mechanism distinct from the Drosophila MSL complex–histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation pathway. CRISPR knockout of Anopheles msl-2 leads to embryonic lethality in both sexes. Transcriptome analyses indicate that this phenotype is not a consequence of defective X chromosome DC. By immunofluorescence and ChIP, H4K16ac does not preferentially enrich on the male X. Instead, the mosquito MSL pathway regulates conserved developmental genes. We conclude that a novel mechanism confers X chromosome up-regulation in Anopheles. Our findings highlight the pluralism of gene-dosage buffering mechanisms even under similar genomic and functional constraints. Life Science Alliance LLC 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8321682/ /pubmed/34266874 http://dx.doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202000996 Text en © 2021 Keller Valsecchi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Keller Valsecchi, Claudia Isabelle
Marois, Eric
Basilicata, M Felicia
Georgiev, Plamen
Akhtar, Asifa
Distinct mechanisms mediate X chromosome dosage compensation in Anopheles and Drosophila
title Distinct mechanisms mediate X chromosome dosage compensation in Anopheles and Drosophila
title_full Distinct mechanisms mediate X chromosome dosage compensation in Anopheles and Drosophila
title_fullStr Distinct mechanisms mediate X chromosome dosage compensation in Anopheles and Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed Distinct mechanisms mediate X chromosome dosage compensation in Anopheles and Drosophila
title_short Distinct mechanisms mediate X chromosome dosage compensation in Anopheles and Drosophila
title_sort distinct mechanisms mediate x chromosome dosage compensation in anopheles and drosophila
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34266874
http://dx.doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202000996
work_keys_str_mv AT kellervalsecchiclaudiaisabelle distinctmechanismsmediatexchromosomedosagecompensationinanophelesanddrosophila
AT maroiseric distinctmechanismsmediatexchromosomedosagecompensationinanophelesanddrosophila
AT basilicatamfelicia distinctmechanismsmediatexchromosomedosagecompensationinanophelesanddrosophila
AT georgievplamen distinctmechanismsmediatexchromosomedosagecompensationinanophelesanddrosophila
AT akhtarasifa distinctmechanismsmediatexchromosomedosagecompensationinanophelesanddrosophila