Cargando…
Dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method
Dialysis adequacy is an important survival indicator in patients with chronic hemodialysis. However, there are inconveniences and disadvantages to measuring dialysis adequacy by blood samples. This study used machine learning models to predict dialysis adequacy in chronic hemodialysis patients using...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8322325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94964-1 |
_version_ | 1783731029179105280 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Hyung Woo Heo, Seok-Jae Kim, Jae Young Kim, Annie Nam, Chung-Mo Kim, Beom Seok |
author_facet | Kim, Hyung Woo Heo, Seok-Jae Kim, Jae Young Kim, Annie Nam, Chung-Mo Kim, Beom Seok |
author_sort | Kim, Hyung Woo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dialysis adequacy is an important survival indicator in patients with chronic hemodialysis. However, there are inconveniences and disadvantages to measuring dialysis adequacy by blood samples. This study used machine learning models to predict dialysis adequacy in chronic hemodialysis patients using repeatedly measured data during hemodialysis. This study included 1333 hemodialysis sessions corresponding to the monthly examination dates of 61 patients. Patient demographics and clinical parameters were continuously measured from the hemodialysis machine; 240 measurements were collected from each hemodialysis session. Machine learning models (random forest and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]) and deep learning models (convolutional neural network and gated recurrent unit) were compared with multivariable linear regression models. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (Corr) for each model using fivefold cross-validation were calculated as performance measurements. The XGBoost model had the best performance among all methods (MAPE = 2.500; RMSE = 2.906; Corr = 0.873). The deep learning models with convolutional neural network (MAPE = 2.835; RMSE = 3.125; Corr = 0.833) and gated recurrent unit (MAPE = 2.974; RMSE = 3.230; Corr = 0.824) had similar performances. The linear regression models had the lowest performance (MAPE = 3.284; RMSE = 3.586; Corr = 0.770) compared with other models. Machine learning methods can accurately infer hemodialysis adequacy using continuously measured data from hemodialysis machines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8322325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83223252021-07-30 Dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method Kim, Hyung Woo Heo, Seok-Jae Kim, Jae Young Kim, Annie Nam, Chung-Mo Kim, Beom Seok Sci Rep Article Dialysis adequacy is an important survival indicator in patients with chronic hemodialysis. However, there are inconveniences and disadvantages to measuring dialysis adequacy by blood samples. This study used machine learning models to predict dialysis adequacy in chronic hemodialysis patients using repeatedly measured data during hemodialysis. This study included 1333 hemodialysis sessions corresponding to the monthly examination dates of 61 patients. Patient demographics and clinical parameters were continuously measured from the hemodialysis machine; 240 measurements were collected from each hemodialysis session. Machine learning models (random forest and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]) and deep learning models (convolutional neural network and gated recurrent unit) were compared with multivariable linear regression models. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (Corr) for each model using fivefold cross-validation were calculated as performance measurements. The XGBoost model had the best performance among all methods (MAPE = 2.500; RMSE = 2.906; Corr = 0.873). The deep learning models with convolutional neural network (MAPE = 2.835; RMSE = 3.125; Corr = 0.833) and gated recurrent unit (MAPE = 2.974; RMSE = 3.230; Corr = 0.824) had similar performances. The linear regression models had the lowest performance (MAPE = 3.284; RMSE = 3.586; Corr = 0.770) compared with other models. Machine learning methods can accurately infer hemodialysis adequacy using continuously measured data from hemodialysis machines. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8322325/ /pubmed/34326393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94964-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Hyung Woo Heo, Seok-Jae Kim, Jae Young Kim, Annie Nam, Chung-Mo Kim, Beom Seok Dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method |
title | Dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method |
title_full | Dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method |
title_fullStr | Dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method |
title_full_unstemmed | Dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method |
title_short | Dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method |
title_sort | dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8322325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94964-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhyungwoo dialysisadequacypredictionsusingamachinelearningmethod AT heoseokjae dialysisadequacypredictionsusingamachinelearningmethod AT kimjaeyoung dialysisadequacypredictionsusingamachinelearningmethod AT kimannie dialysisadequacypredictionsusingamachinelearningmethod AT namchungmo dialysisadequacypredictionsusingamachinelearningmethod AT kimbeomseok dialysisadequacypredictionsusingamachinelearningmethod |