Cargando…

Comprehensive Evaluation of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening to Detect Fetal Copy Number Variations

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in prenatal screening of fetal pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the prenatal screening capacity using traditional and retrospective approaches. For the traditional method, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jing, Zhang, Bin, Zhou, Lingna, Zhou, Qin, Chen, Yingping, Yu, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8322773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335682
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.665589
_version_ 1783731126477520896
author Wang, Jing
Zhang, Bin
Zhou, Lingna
Zhou, Qin
Chen, Yingping
Yu, Bin
author_facet Wang, Jing
Zhang, Bin
Zhou, Lingna
Zhou, Qin
Chen, Yingping
Yu, Bin
author_sort Wang, Jing
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in prenatal screening of fetal pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the prenatal screening capacity using traditional and retrospective approaches. For the traditional method, we evaluated 24,613 pregnant women who underwent NIPS; cases which fetal CNVs were suggested underwent prenatal diagnosis with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). For the retrospective method, we retrospectively evaluated 47 cases with fetal pathogenic CNVs by NIPS. A systematic literature search was performed to compare the evaluation efficiency. RESULTS: Among the 24,613 pregnant women who received NIPS, 124 (0.50%) were suspected to have fetal CNVs. Of these, 66 women underwent prenatal diagnosis with CMA and 13 had true-positive results. The positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPS for fetal CNVs was 19.7%. Among 1,161 women who did not receive NIPS and underwent prenatal diagnosis by CMA, 47 were confirmed to have fetal pathogenic CNVs. Retesting with NIPS indicated that 24 of these 47 cases could also be detected by NIPS, representing a detection rate (DR) of 51.1%. In total, 10 publications, namely, six retrospective studies and four prospective studies, met our criteria and were selected for a detailed full-text review. The reported DRs were 61.10–97.70% and the PPVs were 36.11–80.56%. The sizes of CNVs were closely related to the accuracy of NIPS detection. The DR was 41.9% (13/31) in fetuses with CNVs ≤ 3 Mb, but was 55.0% (11/20) in fetuses with CNVs > 3 Mb. Finally, to intuitively show the CNVs accurately detected by NIPS, we mapped all CNVs to chromosomes according to their location, size, and characteristics. NIPS detected fetal CNVs in 2q13 and 4q35. CONCLUSION: The DR and PPV of NIPS for fetal CNVs were approximately 51.1% and 19.7%, respectively. Follow-up molecular prenatal diagnosis is recommended in cases where NIPS suggests fetal CNVs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8322773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83227732021-07-31 Comprehensive Evaluation of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening to Detect Fetal Copy Number Variations Wang, Jing Zhang, Bin Zhou, Lingna Zhou, Qin Chen, Yingping Yu, Bin Front Genet Genetics OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in prenatal screening of fetal pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the prenatal screening capacity using traditional and retrospective approaches. For the traditional method, we evaluated 24,613 pregnant women who underwent NIPS; cases which fetal CNVs were suggested underwent prenatal diagnosis with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). For the retrospective method, we retrospectively evaluated 47 cases with fetal pathogenic CNVs by NIPS. A systematic literature search was performed to compare the evaluation efficiency. RESULTS: Among the 24,613 pregnant women who received NIPS, 124 (0.50%) were suspected to have fetal CNVs. Of these, 66 women underwent prenatal diagnosis with CMA and 13 had true-positive results. The positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPS for fetal CNVs was 19.7%. Among 1,161 women who did not receive NIPS and underwent prenatal diagnosis by CMA, 47 were confirmed to have fetal pathogenic CNVs. Retesting with NIPS indicated that 24 of these 47 cases could also be detected by NIPS, representing a detection rate (DR) of 51.1%. In total, 10 publications, namely, six retrospective studies and four prospective studies, met our criteria and were selected for a detailed full-text review. The reported DRs were 61.10–97.70% and the PPVs were 36.11–80.56%. The sizes of CNVs were closely related to the accuracy of NIPS detection. The DR was 41.9% (13/31) in fetuses with CNVs ≤ 3 Mb, but was 55.0% (11/20) in fetuses with CNVs > 3 Mb. Finally, to intuitively show the CNVs accurately detected by NIPS, we mapped all CNVs to chromosomes according to their location, size, and characteristics. NIPS detected fetal CNVs in 2q13 and 4q35. CONCLUSION: The DR and PPV of NIPS for fetal CNVs were approximately 51.1% and 19.7%, respectively. Follow-up molecular prenatal diagnosis is recommended in cases where NIPS suggests fetal CNVs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8322773/ /pubmed/34335682 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.665589 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Zhang, Zhou, Zhou, Chen and Yu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Wang, Jing
Zhang, Bin
Zhou, Lingna
Zhou, Qin
Chen, Yingping
Yu, Bin
Comprehensive Evaluation of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening to Detect Fetal Copy Number Variations
title Comprehensive Evaluation of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening to Detect Fetal Copy Number Variations
title_full Comprehensive Evaluation of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening to Detect Fetal Copy Number Variations
title_fullStr Comprehensive Evaluation of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening to Detect Fetal Copy Number Variations
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Evaluation of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening to Detect Fetal Copy Number Variations
title_short Comprehensive Evaluation of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening to Detect Fetal Copy Number Variations
title_sort comprehensive evaluation of non-invasive prenatal screening to detect fetal copy number variations
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8322773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335682
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.665589
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjing comprehensiveevaluationofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtodetectfetalcopynumbervariations
AT zhangbin comprehensiveevaluationofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtodetectfetalcopynumbervariations
AT zhoulingna comprehensiveevaluationofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtodetectfetalcopynumbervariations
AT zhouqin comprehensiveevaluationofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtodetectfetalcopynumbervariations
AT chenyingping comprehensiveevaluationofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtodetectfetalcopynumbervariations
AT yubin comprehensiveevaluationofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtodetectfetalcopynumbervariations