Cargando…
Outcomes of transulnar and transradial percutaneous coronary intervention using ultrasound guided access in patients selected based on an ultrasound algorithm
We performed a prospective observational study of 215 patients (58 ± 11 years) and compared the outcomes of ultrasound guided ulnar (n = 98, 45.6%) vs. radial (n = 117, 54.4%) cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients selected by an ultrasound based algorithm....
Autores principales: | Kar, Subrata, Shah, Aayush |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8322800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34154757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2021.03.005 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Transulnar versus Transradial Access as a Default Strategy for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
por: Ranwa, Bhanwar L., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Transradial and transulnar access for iliac artery interventions using sheathless guiding systems: A feasibility study
por: Ruzsa, Z., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications
por: Roghani-Dehkordi, Farshad, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Lessons from transulnar access for repeat percutaneous coronary intervention after radial artery occlusion
por: Bi, Xi-Le, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Risk‐Treatment Paradox in the Selection of Transradial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
por: Wimmer, Neil J., et al.
Publicado: (2013)