Cargando…

Detecting sub-clinical disease activity in patients with chronic rheumatic valvular heart disease

OBJECTIVE: Valve disease progression in rheumatic heart disease(RHD) is generally attributed to recurrent attacks of acute rheumatic fever(ARF). However, persistence of chronic sub-clinical inflammation remains a plausible but unproven cause. Non-invasive means to identify sub-clinical inflammation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singal, Aayush Kumar, Devagourou, Velayoudam, Hote, Milind Padmakar, Choudhary, Shiv Kumar, Parakh, Neeraj, Ray, Ruma, Lakshmy, Ramakrishnan, Karthikeyan, Ganesan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8322815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34154748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2021.02.009
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Valve disease progression in rheumatic heart disease(RHD) is generally attributed to recurrent attacks of acute rheumatic fever(ARF). However, persistence of chronic sub-clinical inflammation remains a plausible but unproven cause. Non-invasive means to identify sub-clinical inflammation may facilitate research efforts towards understanding its contribution to disease progression. METHODS: Patients with chronic RHD, without clinical evidence of ARF, undergoing elective valve surgery were enrolled. Sub-clinical inflammation was ascertained by histological evaluation of left atrial appendage and valve tissue excised during surgery. We assessed the diagnostic utility of Gallium-67 scintigraphy imaging, and inflammatory biomarkers, hsCRP, IL-2, IL-6, Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha(TNF-α), Interferon-gamma(IFN-γ), and Serum Amyloid A(SAA), in identifying patients with sub-clinical inflammation. RESULTS: Of the 93 RHD patients enrolled(mean age 34 ± 11 years, 45% females), 86 were included in final analysis. Sub-clinical inflammation was present in 27 patients(31.4%). Patients with dominant regurgitant lesions were more likely to have sub-clinical inflammation compared to those with stenotic lesions, though this association was not statistically significant(dominant regurgitant lesions vs isolated mitral stenosis: OR 3.5, 95%CI 0.68–17.96, p = 0.133). Inflammatory biomarkers were elevated in the majority of patients: hsCRP, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ in 44%, 89%, 90%, 79%, and 81% patients, respectively. However, there was no significant association between biomarker elevation and histologically ascertained sub-clinical inflammation. Ga-67 imaging was unable to identify inflammation in the 15 patients in whom it was performed. CONCLUSION: Sub-clinical inflammation is common in RHD patients. Conventional inflammatory markers are elevated in the majority, but aren’t discriminatory enough to identify the presence of histologic inflammation.