Cargando…
A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100
OBJECTIVE: Insulin icodec is a novel once-weekly basal insulin analog. This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of icodec using different once-weekly titration algorithms. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a phase 2, randomized, open-label, 16-week, treat-to-target study. Insulin-naive ad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875484 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2878 |
_version_ | 1783731189465481216 |
---|---|
author | Lingvay, Ildiko Buse, John B. Franek, Edward Hansen, Melissa V. Koefoed, Mette M. Mathieu, Chantal Pettus, Jeremy Stachlewska, Karolina Rosenstock, Julio |
author_facet | Lingvay, Ildiko Buse, John B. Franek, Edward Hansen, Melissa V. Koefoed, Mette M. Mathieu, Chantal Pettus, Jeremy Stachlewska, Karolina Rosenstock, Julio |
author_sort | Lingvay, Ildiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Insulin icodec is a novel once-weekly basal insulin analog. This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of icodec using different once-weekly titration algorithms. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a phase 2, randomized, open-label, 16-week, treat-to-target study. Insulin-naive adults (n = 205) with type 2 diabetes and HbA(1c) 7–10% while treated with oral glucose-lowering medications initiated once-weekly icodec titrations A (prebreakfast self-measured blood glucose target 80–130 mg/dL; adjustment ±21 units/week; n = 51), B (80–130 mg/dL; ±28 units/week; n = 51), or C (70–108 mg/dL; ±28 units/week; n = 52), or once-daily insulin glargine 100 units/mL (IGlar U100) (80–130 mg/dL; ±4 units/day; n = 51), all titrated weekly. Percentage of time in range (TIR) (70–180 mg/dL) during weeks 15 and 16 was measured using continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: TIR improved from baseline (means: A, 57.0%; B, 55.2%; C, 51.0%; IGlar U100, 55.3%) to weeks 15 and 16 (estimated mean: A, 76.6%; B, 83.0%; C, 80.9%; IGlar U100, 75.9%). TIR was greater for titration B than for IGlar U100 (estimated treatment difference 7.08%-points; 95% CI 2.12 to 12.04; P = 0.005). No unexpected safety signals were observed. Level 2 hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) was low in all groups (0.05, 0.15, 0.38, 0.00 events per patient-year of exposure for icodec titrations A, B, and C and IGlar U100, respectively), with no episodes of severe hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly icodec was efficacious and well tolerated across all three titration algorithms investigated. The results for icodec titration A (80–130 mg/dL; ±21 units/week) displayed the best balance between glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8323172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83231722021-08-19 A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 Lingvay, Ildiko Buse, John B. Franek, Edward Hansen, Melissa V. Koefoed, Mette M. Mathieu, Chantal Pettus, Jeremy Stachlewska, Karolina Rosenstock, Julio Diabetes Care Emerging Therapies: Drugs and Regimens OBJECTIVE: Insulin icodec is a novel once-weekly basal insulin analog. This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of icodec using different once-weekly titration algorithms. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a phase 2, randomized, open-label, 16-week, treat-to-target study. Insulin-naive adults (n = 205) with type 2 diabetes and HbA(1c) 7–10% while treated with oral glucose-lowering medications initiated once-weekly icodec titrations A (prebreakfast self-measured blood glucose target 80–130 mg/dL; adjustment ±21 units/week; n = 51), B (80–130 mg/dL; ±28 units/week; n = 51), or C (70–108 mg/dL; ±28 units/week; n = 52), or once-daily insulin glargine 100 units/mL (IGlar U100) (80–130 mg/dL; ±4 units/day; n = 51), all titrated weekly. Percentage of time in range (TIR) (70–180 mg/dL) during weeks 15 and 16 was measured using continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: TIR improved from baseline (means: A, 57.0%; B, 55.2%; C, 51.0%; IGlar U100, 55.3%) to weeks 15 and 16 (estimated mean: A, 76.6%; B, 83.0%; C, 80.9%; IGlar U100, 75.9%). TIR was greater for titration B than for IGlar U100 (estimated treatment difference 7.08%-points; 95% CI 2.12 to 12.04; P = 0.005). No unexpected safety signals were observed. Level 2 hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) was low in all groups (0.05, 0.15, 0.38, 0.00 events per patient-year of exposure for icodec titrations A, B, and C and IGlar U100, respectively), with no episodes of severe hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly icodec was efficacious and well tolerated across all three titration algorithms investigated. The results for icodec titration A (80–130 mg/dL; ±21 units/week) displayed the best balance between glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia. American Diabetes Association 2021-07 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8323172/ /pubmed/33875484 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2878 Text en © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/licenseReaders may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license. |
spellingShingle | Emerging Therapies: Drugs and Regimens Lingvay, Ildiko Buse, John B. Franek, Edward Hansen, Melissa V. Koefoed, Mette M. Mathieu, Chantal Pettus, Jeremy Stachlewska, Karolina Rosenstock, Julio A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 |
title | A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 |
title_full | A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 |
title_fullStr | A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 |
title_short | A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 |
title_sort | randomized, open-label comparison of once-weekly insulin icodec titration strategies versus once-daily insulin glargine u100 |
topic | Emerging Therapies: Drugs and Regimens |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875484 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lingvayildiko arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT busejohnb arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT franekedward arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT hansenmelissav arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT koefoedmettem arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT mathieuchantal arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT pettusjeremy arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT stachlewskakarolina arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT rosenstockjulio arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT lingvayildiko randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT busejohnb randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT franekedward randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT hansenmelissav randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT koefoedmettem randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT mathieuchantal randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT pettusjeremy randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT stachlewskakarolina randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 AT rosenstockjulio randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100 |