Cargando…

A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100

OBJECTIVE: Insulin icodec is a novel once-weekly basal insulin analog. This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of icodec using different once-weekly titration algorithms. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a phase 2, randomized, open-label, 16-week, treat-to-target study. Insulin-naive ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lingvay, Ildiko, Buse, John B., Franek, Edward, Hansen, Melissa V., Koefoed, Mette M., Mathieu, Chantal, Pettus, Jeremy, Stachlewska, Karolina, Rosenstock, Julio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875484
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2878
_version_ 1783731189465481216
author Lingvay, Ildiko
Buse, John B.
Franek, Edward
Hansen, Melissa V.
Koefoed, Mette M.
Mathieu, Chantal
Pettus, Jeremy
Stachlewska, Karolina
Rosenstock, Julio
author_facet Lingvay, Ildiko
Buse, John B.
Franek, Edward
Hansen, Melissa V.
Koefoed, Mette M.
Mathieu, Chantal
Pettus, Jeremy
Stachlewska, Karolina
Rosenstock, Julio
author_sort Lingvay, Ildiko
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Insulin icodec is a novel once-weekly basal insulin analog. This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of icodec using different once-weekly titration algorithms. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a phase 2, randomized, open-label, 16-week, treat-to-target study. Insulin-naive adults (n = 205) with type 2 diabetes and HbA(1c) 7–10% while treated with oral glucose-lowering medications initiated once-weekly icodec titrations A (prebreakfast self-measured blood glucose target 80–130 mg/dL; adjustment ±21 units/week; n = 51), B (80–130 mg/dL; ±28 units/week; n = 51), or C (70–108 mg/dL; ±28 units/week; n = 52), or once-daily insulin glargine 100 units/mL (IGlar U100) (80–130 mg/dL; ±4 units/day; n = 51), all titrated weekly. Percentage of time in range (TIR) (70–180 mg/dL) during weeks 15 and 16 was measured using continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: TIR improved from baseline (means: A, 57.0%; B, 55.2%; C, 51.0%; IGlar U100, 55.3%) to weeks 15 and 16 (estimated mean: A, 76.6%; B, 83.0%; C, 80.9%; IGlar U100, 75.9%). TIR was greater for titration B than for IGlar U100 (estimated treatment difference 7.08%-points; 95% CI 2.12 to 12.04; P = 0.005). No unexpected safety signals were observed. Level 2 hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) was low in all groups (0.05, 0.15, 0.38, 0.00 events per patient-year of exposure for icodec titrations A, B, and C and IGlar U100, respectively), with no episodes of severe hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly icodec was efficacious and well tolerated across all three titration algorithms investigated. The results for icodec titration A (80–130 mg/dL; ±21 units/week) displayed the best balance between glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8323172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83231722021-08-19 A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 Lingvay, Ildiko Buse, John B. Franek, Edward Hansen, Melissa V. Koefoed, Mette M. Mathieu, Chantal Pettus, Jeremy Stachlewska, Karolina Rosenstock, Julio Diabetes Care Emerging Therapies: Drugs and Regimens OBJECTIVE: Insulin icodec is a novel once-weekly basal insulin analog. This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of icodec using different once-weekly titration algorithms. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a phase 2, randomized, open-label, 16-week, treat-to-target study. Insulin-naive adults (n = 205) with type 2 diabetes and HbA(1c) 7–10% while treated with oral glucose-lowering medications initiated once-weekly icodec titrations A (prebreakfast self-measured blood glucose target 80–130 mg/dL; adjustment ±21 units/week; n = 51), B (80–130 mg/dL; ±28 units/week; n = 51), or C (70–108 mg/dL; ±28 units/week; n = 52), or once-daily insulin glargine 100 units/mL (IGlar U100) (80–130 mg/dL; ±4 units/day; n = 51), all titrated weekly. Percentage of time in range (TIR) (70–180 mg/dL) during weeks 15 and 16 was measured using continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: TIR improved from baseline (means: A, 57.0%; B, 55.2%; C, 51.0%; IGlar U100, 55.3%) to weeks 15 and 16 (estimated mean: A, 76.6%; B, 83.0%; C, 80.9%; IGlar U100, 75.9%). TIR was greater for titration B than for IGlar U100 (estimated treatment difference 7.08%-points; 95% CI 2.12 to 12.04; P = 0.005). No unexpected safety signals were observed. Level 2 hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) was low in all groups (0.05, 0.15, 0.38, 0.00 events per patient-year of exposure for icodec titrations A, B, and C and IGlar U100, respectively), with no episodes of severe hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly icodec was efficacious and well tolerated across all three titration algorithms investigated. The results for icodec titration A (80–130 mg/dL; ±21 units/week) displayed the best balance between glycemic control and risk of hypoglycemia. American Diabetes Association 2021-07 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8323172/ /pubmed/33875484 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2878 Text en © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/licenseReaders may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.
spellingShingle Emerging Therapies: Drugs and Regimens
Lingvay, Ildiko
Buse, John B.
Franek, Edward
Hansen, Melissa V.
Koefoed, Mette M.
Mathieu, Chantal
Pettus, Jeremy
Stachlewska, Karolina
Rosenstock, Julio
A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100
title A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100
title_full A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100
title_fullStr A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100
title_short A Randomized, Open-Label Comparison of Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Titration Strategies Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100
title_sort randomized, open-label comparison of once-weekly insulin icodec titration strategies versus once-daily insulin glargine u100
topic Emerging Therapies: Drugs and Regimens
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33875484
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc20-2878
work_keys_str_mv AT lingvayildiko arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT busejohnb arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT franekedward arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT hansenmelissav arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT koefoedmettem arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT mathieuchantal arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT pettusjeremy arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT stachlewskakarolina arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT rosenstockjulio arandomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT lingvayildiko randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT busejohnb randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT franekedward randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT hansenmelissav randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT koefoedmettem randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT mathieuchantal randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT pettusjeremy randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT stachlewskakarolina randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100
AT rosenstockjulio randomizedopenlabelcomparisonofonceweeklyinsulinicodectitrationstrategiesversusoncedailyinsulinglargineu100