Cargando…

Predictors of the surgical outcome of propeller perforator flap reconstruction, focusing on the effective safe distance between the perforator and the wound edge

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue defects in the distal third of the leg and malleolus are difficult to cover and often require free tissue transfer, even for small-sized defects. Propeller flaps were designed as an alternative to free tissue transfer, but are reportedly associated with high complication rate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Peng, Lin, Fang, Ma, Yunhong, Wang, Jianbing, Zhou, Ming, Rui, Yongjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34325690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04522-z
_version_ 1783731212061245440
author Wang, Peng
Lin, Fang
Ma, Yunhong
Wang, Jianbing
Zhou, Ming
Rui, Yongjun
author_facet Wang, Peng
Lin, Fang
Ma, Yunhong
Wang, Jianbing
Zhou, Ming
Rui, Yongjun
author_sort Wang, Peng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Soft tissue defects in the distal third of the leg and malleolus are difficult to cover and often require free tissue transfer, even for small-sized defects. Propeller flaps were designed as an alternative to free tissue transfer, but are reportedly associated with high complication rates. The aim of our study was to assess our institutional experience with the propeller flap technique and to predict its outcome in lower-limb reconstruction. METHODS: All patients who had undergone propeller flap reconstruction of a distal leg defect between 2013 and 2018 were included. Demographic, clinical, and follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 17 of 82 propeller flaps (20.7%), comprising 11 cases of partial necrosis and six of total necrosis. There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index smoking, diabetes mellitus, and soft tissue defect sites between the groups of patients with versus without flap necrosis (p > 0.05). In univariate analysis, there were also no significant differences between these two groups in the length and width of the fascial pedicle, and the ratio of the flap length to the flap width (p > 0.05). Interestingly, there were significant differences between the two groups in the distance between the flap perforator, the shortest distance from the perforator to the defect location, and the rotation angle of the flap (p < 0.05). In multivariable logistic regression analysis with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), the shortest distance from the perforator to the defect location was a significant risk factor for flap complications (p = 0.000; OR = 0.806). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that when the shortest distance from the flap to the wound was less than 3.5 cm, the necrosis rate of the flap was markedly increased (AUC = 76.1); this suggests that the effective safe flap–wound distance was 3.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Propeller flaps are a reliable option for reconstruction in carefully selected patients with traumatic defects of the lower limb and malleolus. We found that the effective safe distance was 3.5 cm from the flap to the wound.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8323287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83232872021-07-30 Predictors of the surgical outcome of propeller perforator flap reconstruction, focusing on the effective safe distance between the perforator and the wound edge Wang, Peng Lin, Fang Ma, Yunhong Wang, Jianbing Zhou, Ming Rui, Yongjun BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Soft tissue defects in the distal third of the leg and malleolus are difficult to cover and often require free tissue transfer, even for small-sized defects. Propeller flaps were designed as an alternative to free tissue transfer, but are reportedly associated with high complication rates. The aim of our study was to assess our institutional experience with the propeller flap technique and to predict its outcome in lower-limb reconstruction. METHODS: All patients who had undergone propeller flap reconstruction of a distal leg defect between 2013 and 2018 were included. Demographic, clinical, and follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 17 of 82 propeller flaps (20.7%), comprising 11 cases of partial necrosis and six of total necrosis. There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index smoking, diabetes mellitus, and soft tissue defect sites between the groups of patients with versus without flap necrosis (p > 0.05). In univariate analysis, there were also no significant differences between these two groups in the length and width of the fascial pedicle, and the ratio of the flap length to the flap width (p > 0.05). Interestingly, there were significant differences between the two groups in the distance between the flap perforator, the shortest distance from the perforator to the defect location, and the rotation angle of the flap (p < 0.05). In multivariable logistic regression analysis with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), the shortest distance from the perforator to the defect location was a significant risk factor for flap complications (p = 0.000; OR = 0.806). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that when the shortest distance from the flap to the wound was less than 3.5 cm, the necrosis rate of the flap was markedly increased (AUC = 76.1); this suggests that the effective safe flap–wound distance was 3.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Propeller flaps are a reliable option for reconstruction in carefully selected patients with traumatic defects of the lower limb and malleolus. We found that the effective safe distance was 3.5 cm from the flap to the wound. BioMed Central 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8323287/ /pubmed/34325690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04522-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Peng
Lin, Fang
Ma, Yunhong
Wang, Jianbing
Zhou, Ming
Rui, Yongjun
Predictors of the surgical outcome of propeller perforator flap reconstruction, focusing on the effective safe distance between the perforator and the wound edge
title Predictors of the surgical outcome of propeller perforator flap reconstruction, focusing on the effective safe distance between the perforator and the wound edge
title_full Predictors of the surgical outcome of propeller perforator flap reconstruction, focusing on the effective safe distance between the perforator and the wound edge
title_fullStr Predictors of the surgical outcome of propeller perforator flap reconstruction, focusing on the effective safe distance between the perforator and the wound edge
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of the surgical outcome of propeller perforator flap reconstruction, focusing on the effective safe distance between the perforator and the wound edge
title_short Predictors of the surgical outcome of propeller perforator flap reconstruction, focusing on the effective safe distance between the perforator and the wound edge
title_sort predictors of the surgical outcome of propeller perforator flap reconstruction, focusing on the effective safe distance between the perforator and the wound edge
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34325690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04522-z
work_keys_str_mv AT wangpeng predictorsofthesurgicaloutcomeofpropellerperforatorflapreconstructionfocusingontheeffectivesafedistancebetweentheperforatorandthewoundedge
AT linfang predictorsofthesurgicaloutcomeofpropellerperforatorflapreconstructionfocusingontheeffectivesafedistancebetweentheperforatorandthewoundedge
AT mayunhong predictorsofthesurgicaloutcomeofpropellerperforatorflapreconstructionfocusingontheeffectivesafedistancebetweentheperforatorandthewoundedge
AT wangjianbing predictorsofthesurgicaloutcomeofpropellerperforatorflapreconstructionfocusingontheeffectivesafedistancebetweentheperforatorandthewoundedge
AT zhouming predictorsofthesurgicaloutcomeofpropellerperforatorflapreconstructionfocusingontheeffectivesafedistancebetweentheperforatorandthewoundedge
AT ruiyongjun predictorsofthesurgicaloutcomeofpropellerperforatorflapreconstructionfocusingontheeffectivesafedistancebetweentheperforatorandthewoundedge