Cargando…

‘Gut health’ and the microbiome in the popular press: a content analysis

OBJECTIVE: Extensive research and important discoveries on the microbiome have led to a growth in media coverage. This study explores how the microbiome has been portrayed in press sources popular among American and Canadian audiences. DESIGN: Content analysis. METHODS: Using the FACTIVA Database, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcon, Alessandro R, Turvey, Stuart, Caulfield, Timothy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052446
_version_ 1783731224529862656
author Marcon, Alessandro R
Turvey, Stuart
Caulfield, Timothy
author_facet Marcon, Alessandro R
Turvey, Stuart
Caulfield, Timothy
author_sort Marcon, Alessandro R
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Extensive research and important discoveries on the microbiome have led to a growth in media coverage. This study explores how the microbiome has been portrayed in press sources popular among American and Canadian audiences. DESIGN: Content analysis. METHODS: Using the FACTIVA Database, we compiled a finalised data set of (N=830) articles from press sources popular among American and Canadian audiences which were published between 1 January 2018 and 11 October 2019 and which contained at least one of the following search terms: ‘microbiome’, ‘microbiota’, ‘gut health’, ‘healthy gut’, ‘unhealthy gut’, ‘gut bacteria’, ‘probiotic’ or ‘probiotics.’ We performed content analysis on the articles to determine how often ideas of the microbiome were presented as beneficial, in which health contexts, and whether actions could be taken to reap stated benefits. We compared this portrayal of benefits with critical portrayals of the microbiome. RESULTS: Almost all of the articles (94%) described health benefits associated with the microbiome with many (79%) describing actions which could be taken to reap stated benefits. Articles most often described health benefits in more broad, general context (34%) and most commonly outlined actions related to food/drug (45%) as well as probiotic (27%) intake. Only some articles (19%) provided microbiome-related critiques or limitations. Some of the articles (22%) were focused on highlighting specific research developments, and in these articles, critiques or limitations were more common. CONCLUSIONS: Articles discussing the microbiome published for American and Canadian audiences typically hype the microbiome’s impact and popularise gut health trends while only offering a little in the way of communicating microbiome science. Lifestyle choices including nutrition, taking probiotics, stress management and exercise are often promoted as means of reaping the microbiome-related health benefits. The trend of actionable ‘gut health’ is foregrounded over more evidence-based descriptions of microbiome science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8323349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83233492021-08-19 ‘Gut health’ and the microbiome in the popular press: a content analysis Marcon, Alessandro R Turvey, Stuart Caulfield, Timothy BMJ Open Genetics and Genomics OBJECTIVE: Extensive research and important discoveries on the microbiome have led to a growth in media coverage. This study explores how the microbiome has been portrayed in press sources popular among American and Canadian audiences. DESIGN: Content analysis. METHODS: Using the FACTIVA Database, we compiled a finalised data set of (N=830) articles from press sources popular among American and Canadian audiences which were published between 1 January 2018 and 11 October 2019 and which contained at least one of the following search terms: ‘microbiome’, ‘microbiota’, ‘gut health’, ‘healthy gut’, ‘unhealthy gut’, ‘gut bacteria’, ‘probiotic’ or ‘probiotics.’ We performed content analysis on the articles to determine how often ideas of the microbiome were presented as beneficial, in which health contexts, and whether actions could be taken to reap stated benefits. We compared this portrayal of benefits with critical portrayals of the microbiome. RESULTS: Almost all of the articles (94%) described health benefits associated with the microbiome with many (79%) describing actions which could be taken to reap stated benefits. Articles most often described health benefits in more broad, general context (34%) and most commonly outlined actions related to food/drug (45%) as well as probiotic (27%) intake. Only some articles (19%) provided microbiome-related critiques or limitations. Some of the articles (22%) were focused on highlighting specific research developments, and in these articles, critiques or limitations were more common. CONCLUSIONS: Articles discussing the microbiome published for American and Canadian audiences typically hype the microbiome’s impact and popularise gut health trends while only offering a little in the way of communicating microbiome science. Lifestyle choices including nutrition, taking probiotics, stress management and exercise are often promoted as means of reaping the microbiome-related health benefits. The trend of actionable ‘gut health’ is foregrounded over more evidence-based descriptions of microbiome science. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8323349/ /pubmed/34326057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052446 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Genetics and Genomics
Marcon, Alessandro R
Turvey, Stuart
Caulfield, Timothy
‘Gut health’ and the microbiome in the popular press: a content analysis
title ‘Gut health’ and the microbiome in the popular press: a content analysis
title_full ‘Gut health’ and the microbiome in the popular press: a content analysis
title_fullStr ‘Gut health’ and the microbiome in the popular press: a content analysis
title_full_unstemmed ‘Gut health’ and the microbiome in the popular press: a content analysis
title_short ‘Gut health’ and the microbiome in the popular press: a content analysis
title_sort ‘gut health’ and the microbiome in the popular press: a content analysis
topic Genetics and Genomics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052446
work_keys_str_mv AT marconalessandror guthealthandthemicrobiomeinthepopularpressacontentanalysis
AT turveystuart guthealthandthemicrobiomeinthepopularpressacontentanalysis
AT caulfieldtimothy guthealthandthemicrobiomeinthepopularpressacontentanalysis