Cargando…
Objective measurement of lung volume recruitment therapy: laboratory and clinical validation
Lung volume recruitment manoeuvres are often prescribed to maintain respiratory health in neuromuscular disease. Unfortunately, no current system accurately records delivered dose. This study determined the performance characteristics of a novel, objective, manual lung volume recruitment bag counter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000918 |
_version_ | 1783731227213168640 |
---|---|
author | Naughton, Phoebe E Sheers, Nicole Berlowitz, David J Howard, Mark E McKim, Douglas A Katz, Sherri L |
author_facet | Naughton, Phoebe E Sheers, Nicole Berlowitz, David J Howard, Mark E McKim, Douglas A Katz, Sherri L |
author_sort | Naughton, Phoebe E |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lung volume recruitment manoeuvres are often prescribed to maintain respiratory health in neuromuscular disease. Unfortunately, no current system accurately records delivered dose. This study determined the performance characteristics of a novel, objective, manual lung volume recruitment bag counter (‘the counter’) with bench and healthy volunteer testing, as well as in individuals with neuromuscular disease. We undertook (1) bench test determination of activation threshold, (2) bench and healthy volunteer fidelity testing during simulated patient interface leak and different pressure compressions and (3) comparisons with self-report in individuals with neuromuscular disease. The data are reported as summary statistics, compression counts, percentage of recorded versus delivered compressions and concordance (Cohen’s kappa (K) and absolute agreement). RESULTS: Minimum counter activation pressure under conditions of zero leak was 1.9±0.4 cm H(2)O. No difference was observed between the number of repetitions delivered and recorded during high airway pressure condition. Interface leak approximating 25% resulted in underestimation of repetition counts, and once the leak was at 50% or beyond, the counter recorded no activity. Faster sampling frequency collected data with more fidelity. Counter data agreed with diary self-report during community trials (16 participants, 960 participant days, 77% agreement, Cohen’s Κ=0.66 and p<0.001). Disagreement typically favoured more diary reported (18%) than counter (5%) sessions. CONCLUSIONS: The performance characteristics of a new lung volume recruitment counter have been established in both laboratory and community settings. Objective usage and dosage data should accelerate new knowledge development and better translation of lung volume recruitment therapy into policy and practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8323364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83233642021-08-19 Objective measurement of lung volume recruitment therapy: laboratory and clinical validation Naughton, Phoebe E Sheers, Nicole Berlowitz, David J Howard, Mark E McKim, Douglas A Katz, Sherri L BMJ Open Respir Res Respiratory Research Lung volume recruitment manoeuvres are often prescribed to maintain respiratory health in neuromuscular disease. Unfortunately, no current system accurately records delivered dose. This study determined the performance characteristics of a novel, objective, manual lung volume recruitment bag counter (‘the counter’) with bench and healthy volunteer testing, as well as in individuals with neuromuscular disease. We undertook (1) bench test determination of activation threshold, (2) bench and healthy volunteer fidelity testing during simulated patient interface leak and different pressure compressions and (3) comparisons with self-report in individuals with neuromuscular disease. The data are reported as summary statistics, compression counts, percentage of recorded versus delivered compressions and concordance (Cohen’s kappa (K) and absolute agreement). RESULTS: Minimum counter activation pressure under conditions of zero leak was 1.9±0.4 cm H(2)O. No difference was observed between the number of repetitions delivered and recorded during high airway pressure condition. Interface leak approximating 25% resulted in underestimation of repetition counts, and once the leak was at 50% or beyond, the counter recorded no activity. Faster sampling frequency collected data with more fidelity. Counter data agreed with diary self-report during community trials (16 participants, 960 participant days, 77% agreement, Cohen’s Κ=0.66 and p<0.001). Disagreement typically favoured more diary reported (18%) than counter (5%) sessions. CONCLUSIONS: The performance characteristics of a new lung volume recruitment counter have been established in both laboratory and community settings. Objective usage and dosage data should accelerate new knowledge development and better translation of lung volume recruitment therapy into policy and practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8323364/ /pubmed/34326156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000918 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Respiratory Research Naughton, Phoebe E Sheers, Nicole Berlowitz, David J Howard, Mark E McKim, Douglas A Katz, Sherri L Objective measurement of lung volume recruitment therapy: laboratory and clinical validation |
title | Objective measurement of lung volume recruitment therapy: laboratory and clinical validation |
title_full | Objective measurement of lung volume recruitment therapy: laboratory and clinical validation |
title_fullStr | Objective measurement of lung volume recruitment therapy: laboratory and clinical validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Objective measurement of lung volume recruitment therapy: laboratory and clinical validation |
title_short | Objective measurement of lung volume recruitment therapy: laboratory and clinical validation |
title_sort | objective measurement of lung volume recruitment therapy: laboratory and clinical validation |
topic | Respiratory Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000918 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naughtonphoebee objectivemeasurementoflungvolumerecruitmenttherapylaboratoryandclinicalvalidation AT sheersnicole objectivemeasurementoflungvolumerecruitmenttherapylaboratoryandclinicalvalidation AT berlowitzdavidj objectivemeasurementoflungvolumerecruitmenttherapylaboratoryandclinicalvalidation AT howardmarke objectivemeasurementoflungvolumerecruitmenttherapylaboratoryandclinicalvalidation AT mckimdouglasa objectivemeasurementoflungvolumerecruitmenttherapylaboratoryandclinicalvalidation AT katzsherril objectivemeasurementoflungvolumerecruitmenttherapylaboratoryandclinicalvalidation |