Cargando…
Mechanics, energetics and implementation of grounded running technique: a narrative review
Grounded running predominantly differs from traditional aerial running by having alternating single and double stance with no flight phase. Approximately, 16% of runners in an open marathon and 33% of recreational runners in a 5 km running event adopted a grounded running technique. Grounded running...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34422290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000963 |
_version_ | 1783731249017257984 |
---|---|
author | Davis, Sheeba Fox, Aaron Bonacci, Jason Davis, Fiddy |
author_facet | Davis, Sheeba Fox, Aaron Bonacci, Jason Davis, Fiddy |
author_sort | Davis, Sheeba |
collection | PubMed |
description | Grounded running predominantly differs from traditional aerial running by having alternating single and double stance with no flight phase. Approximately, 16% of runners in an open marathon and 33% of recreational runners in a 5 km running event adopted a grounded running technique. Grounded running typically occurs at a speed range of 2–3 m·s(−1), is characterised by a larger duty factor, reduced vertical leg stiffness, lower vertical oscillation of the centre of mass (COM) and greater impact attenuation than aerial running. Grounded running typically induces an acute increase in metabolic cost, likely due to the larger duty factor. The increased duty factor may translate to a more stable locomotion. The reduced vertical oscillation of COM, attenuated impact shock, and potential for improved postural stability may make grounded running a preferred form of physical exercise in people new to running or with low loading capacities (eg, novice overweight/obese, elderly runners, rehabilitating athletes). Grounded running as a less impactful, but metabolically more challenging form, could benefit these runners to optimise their cardio-metabolic health, while at the same time minimise running-related injury risk. This review discusses the mechanical demands and energetics of grounded running along with recommendations and suggestions to implement this technique in practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8323463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83234632021-08-19 Mechanics, energetics and implementation of grounded running technique: a narrative review Davis, Sheeba Fox, Aaron Bonacci, Jason Davis, Fiddy BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Review Grounded running predominantly differs from traditional aerial running by having alternating single and double stance with no flight phase. Approximately, 16% of runners in an open marathon and 33% of recreational runners in a 5 km running event adopted a grounded running technique. Grounded running typically occurs at a speed range of 2–3 m·s(−1), is characterised by a larger duty factor, reduced vertical leg stiffness, lower vertical oscillation of the centre of mass (COM) and greater impact attenuation than aerial running. Grounded running typically induces an acute increase in metabolic cost, likely due to the larger duty factor. The increased duty factor may translate to a more stable locomotion. The reduced vertical oscillation of COM, attenuated impact shock, and potential for improved postural stability may make grounded running a preferred form of physical exercise in people new to running or with low loading capacities (eg, novice overweight/obese, elderly runners, rehabilitating athletes). Grounded running as a less impactful, but metabolically more challenging form, could benefit these runners to optimise their cardio-metabolic health, while at the same time minimise running-related injury risk. This review discusses the mechanical demands and energetics of grounded running along with recommendations and suggestions to implement this technique in practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8323463/ /pubmed/34422290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000963 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Davis, Sheeba Fox, Aaron Bonacci, Jason Davis, Fiddy Mechanics, energetics and implementation of grounded running technique: a narrative review |
title | Mechanics, energetics and implementation of grounded running technique: a narrative review |
title_full | Mechanics, energetics and implementation of grounded running technique: a narrative review |
title_fullStr | Mechanics, energetics and implementation of grounded running technique: a narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanics, energetics and implementation of grounded running technique: a narrative review |
title_short | Mechanics, energetics and implementation of grounded running technique: a narrative review |
title_sort | mechanics, energetics and implementation of grounded running technique: a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34422290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000963 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davissheeba mechanicsenergeticsandimplementationofgroundedrunningtechniqueanarrativereview AT foxaaron mechanicsenergeticsandimplementationofgroundedrunningtechniqueanarrativereview AT bonaccijason mechanicsenergeticsandimplementationofgroundedrunningtechniqueanarrativereview AT davisfiddy mechanicsenergeticsandimplementationofgroundedrunningtechniqueanarrativereview |