Cargando…

Bimanual motor skill learning and robotic assistance for chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Using robotic devices might improve recovery post-stroke, but the optimal way to apply robotic assistance has yet to be determined. The current study aimed to investigate whether training under the robotic active-assisted mode improves bimanual motor skill learning (biMSkL) more than training under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeganeh Doost, Maral, Herman, Benoît, Denis, Adrien, Sapin, Julien, Galinski, Daniel, Riga, Audrey, Laloux, Patrice, Bihin, Benoît, Vandermeeren, Yves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433485
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.301030
_version_ 1783731286738731008
author Yeganeh Doost, Maral
Herman, Benoît
Denis, Adrien
Sapin, Julien
Galinski, Daniel
Riga, Audrey
Laloux, Patrice
Bihin, Benoît
Vandermeeren, Yves
author_facet Yeganeh Doost, Maral
Herman, Benoît
Denis, Adrien
Sapin, Julien
Galinski, Daniel
Riga, Audrey
Laloux, Patrice
Bihin, Benoît
Vandermeeren, Yves
author_sort Yeganeh Doost, Maral
collection PubMed
description Using robotic devices might improve recovery post-stroke, but the optimal way to apply robotic assistance has yet to be determined. The current study aimed to investigate whether training under the robotic active-assisted mode improves bimanual motor skill learning (biMSkL) more than training under the active mode in stroke patients. Twenty-six healthy individuals (HI) and 23 chronic hemiparetic stroke patients with a detectable lesion on MRI or CT scan, who demonstrated motor deficits in the upper limb, were randomly allocated to two parallel groups. The protocol included a two-day training on a new bimanual cooperative task, LIFT-THE-TRAY, under either the active or active-assisted modes (where assistance decreased in a pre-determined stepwise fashion) with the bimanual version of the REAplan® robotic device. The hypothesis was that the active-assisted mode would result in greater biMSkL than the active mode. The biMSkL was quantified by a speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) before (T1) and immediately after (T2) training on days 1 and 2 (T3 and T4). The change in SAT after 2 days of training (T4/T1) indicated that both HI and stroke patients learned and retained the bimanual cooperative task. After 2 days of training, the active-assisted mode did not improve biMSkL more than the active mode (T4/T1) in HI nor stroke patients. Whereas HI generalized the learned bimanual skill to different execution speeds in both the active and active-assisted subgroups, the stroke patients generalized the learned skill only in the active subgroup. Taken together, the active-assisted mode, applied in a pre-determined stepwise decreasing fashion, did not improve biMSkL more than the active mode in HI and stroke subjects. Stroke subjects might benefit more from robotic assistance when applied “as-needed.” This study was approved by the local ethical committee (Comité d’éthique médicale, CHU UCL Namur, Mont-Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium; Internal number: 54/2010, EudraCT number: NUB B039201317382) on July 14, 2016 and was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03974750) on June 5, 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8323667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83236672021-08-11 Bimanual motor skill learning and robotic assistance for chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial Yeganeh Doost, Maral Herman, Benoît Denis, Adrien Sapin, Julien Galinski, Daniel Riga, Audrey Laloux, Patrice Bihin, Benoît Vandermeeren, Yves Neural Regen Res Research Article Using robotic devices might improve recovery post-stroke, but the optimal way to apply robotic assistance has yet to be determined. The current study aimed to investigate whether training under the robotic active-assisted mode improves bimanual motor skill learning (biMSkL) more than training under the active mode in stroke patients. Twenty-six healthy individuals (HI) and 23 chronic hemiparetic stroke patients with a detectable lesion on MRI or CT scan, who demonstrated motor deficits in the upper limb, were randomly allocated to two parallel groups. The protocol included a two-day training on a new bimanual cooperative task, LIFT-THE-TRAY, under either the active or active-assisted modes (where assistance decreased in a pre-determined stepwise fashion) with the bimanual version of the REAplan® robotic device. The hypothesis was that the active-assisted mode would result in greater biMSkL than the active mode. The biMSkL was quantified by a speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) before (T1) and immediately after (T2) training on days 1 and 2 (T3 and T4). The change in SAT after 2 days of training (T4/T1) indicated that both HI and stroke patients learned and retained the bimanual cooperative task. After 2 days of training, the active-assisted mode did not improve biMSkL more than the active mode (T4/T1) in HI nor stroke patients. Whereas HI generalized the learned bimanual skill to different execution speeds in both the active and active-assisted subgroups, the stroke patients generalized the learned skill only in the active subgroup. Taken together, the active-assisted mode, applied in a pre-determined stepwise decreasing fashion, did not improve biMSkL more than the active mode in HI and stroke subjects. Stroke subjects might benefit more from robotic assistance when applied “as-needed.” This study was approved by the local ethical committee (Comité d’éthique médicale, CHU UCL Namur, Mont-Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium; Internal number: 54/2010, EudraCT number: NUB B039201317382) on July 14, 2016 and was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03974750) on June 5, 2019. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8323667/ /pubmed/33433485 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.301030 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Neural Regeneration Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yeganeh Doost, Maral
Herman, Benoît
Denis, Adrien
Sapin, Julien
Galinski, Daniel
Riga, Audrey
Laloux, Patrice
Bihin, Benoît
Vandermeeren, Yves
Bimanual motor skill learning and robotic assistance for chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial
title Bimanual motor skill learning and robotic assistance for chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Bimanual motor skill learning and robotic assistance for chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Bimanual motor skill learning and robotic assistance for chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Bimanual motor skill learning and robotic assistance for chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Bimanual motor skill learning and robotic assistance for chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort bimanual motor skill learning and robotic assistance for chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33433485
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.301030
work_keys_str_mv AT yeganehdoostmaral bimanualmotorskilllearningandroboticassistanceforchronichemipareticstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hermanbenoit bimanualmotorskilllearningandroboticassistanceforchronichemipareticstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT denisadrien bimanualmotorskilllearningandroboticassistanceforchronichemipareticstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sapinjulien bimanualmotorskilllearningandroboticassistanceforchronichemipareticstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT galinskidaniel bimanualmotorskilllearningandroboticassistanceforchronichemipareticstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rigaaudrey bimanualmotorskilllearningandroboticassistanceforchronichemipareticstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lalouxpatrice bimanualmotorskilllearningandroboticassistanceforchronichemipareticstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bihinbenoit bimanualmotorskilllearningandroboticassistanceforchronichemipareticstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandermeerenyves bimanualmotorskilllearningandroboticassistanceforchronichemipareticstrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial