Cargando…

Spotlight on the Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism: A Review

Recent evidence indicates that the corneal back surface astigmatism (CBSA) contributes to the refractive state of the eye in cataract surgery, especially with the implantation of toric intraocular lenses. But this has been met with some scepticism. A review of key studies performed over the past thr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Sudi, Tutchenko, Larysa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34345163
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S284616
_version_ 1783731318304014336
author Patel, Sudi
Tutchenko, Larysa
author_facet Patel, Sudi
Tutchenko, Larysa
author_sort Patel, Sudi
collection PubMed
description Recent evidence indicates that the corneal back surface astigmatism (CBSA) contributes to the refractive state of the eye in cataract surgery, especially with the implantation of toric intraocular lenses. But this has been met with some scepticism. A review of key studies performed over the past three decades shows that the mean CBSA power ranges from 0.18(±0.16)D to 1.04(±0.20)D. The clinical assessment of CBSA is problematic. There is poor agreement between the current automated systems for assessment of CBSA and it is assumed that these systems directly measure the CBSA. But CBSA cannot be measured directly in vivo. A historical review of methods used to quantify the curvature of the posterior corneal surface reveals that CBSA estimated by current systems is based on values for corneal front surface astigmatism, corneal refractive index, central corneal thickness, corneal thickness at peripheral locations and the exact distance between the corneal apex and each one of these peripheral locations. Doubts and errors in these values, coupled with the precise details of the algorithm incorporated to estimate CBSA, are the likely sources of the lack of agreement between current systems. These systematic errors cloud the assessment of CBSA. Mean CBSA may be low, but it varies from case to case. There is a clear need for a realistic, practical procedure for clinicians to independently calibrate systems for estimating CBSA. This would help to reduce uncertainty and the discrepancies between instruments designed to measure the same parameter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8323854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83238542021-08-02 Spotlight on the Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism: A Review Patel, Sudi Tutchenko, Larysa Clin Ophthalmol Review Recent evidence indicates that the corneal back surface astigmatism (CBSA) contributes to the refractive state of the eye in cataract surgery, especially with the implantation of toric intraocular lenses. But this has been met with some scepticism. A review of key studies performed over the past three decades shows that the mean CBSA power ranges from 0.18(±0.16)D to 1.04(±0.20)D. The clinical assessment of CBSA is problematic. There is poor agreement between the current automated systems for assessment of CBSA and it is assumed that these systems directly measure the CBSA. But CBSA cannot be measured directly in vivo. A historical review of methods used to quantify the curvature of the posterior corneal surface reveals that CBSA estimated by current systems is based on values for corneal front surface astigmatism, corneal refractive index, central corneal thickness, corneal thickness at peripheral locations and the exact distance between the corneal apex and each one of these peripheral locations. Doubts and errors in these values, coupled with the precise details of the algorithm incorporated to estimate CBSA, are the likely sources of the lack of agreement between current systems. These systematic errors cloud the assessment of CBSA. Mean CBSA may be low, but it varies from case to case. There is a clear need for a realistic, practical procedure for clinicians to independently calibrate systems for estimating CBSA. This would help to reduce uncertainty and the discrepancies between instruments designed to measure the same parameter. Dove 2021-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8323854/ /pubmed/34345163 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S284616 Text en © 2021 Patel and Tutchenko. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Patel, Sudi
Tutchenko, Larysa
Spotlight on the Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism: A Review
title Spotlight on the Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism: A Review
title_full Spotlight on the Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism: A Review
title_fullStr Spotlight on the Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Spotlight on the Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism: A Review
title_short Spotlight on the Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism: A Review
title_sort spotlight on the corneal back surface astigmatism: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8323854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34345163
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S284616
work_keys_str_mv AT patelsudi spotlightonthecornealbacksurfaceastigmatismareview
AT tutchenkolarysa spotlightonthecornealbacksurfaceastigmatismareview