Cargando…

Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Psychosocial Uncertainty Scale

This study presents the development of the Psychosocial Uncertainty Scale (PS-US), which articulates the perception of uncertainty in the social context and its psychological experience. It was validated with a sample of 1596 students and active professionals (employed and unemployed). By randomly d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucas Casanova, Mariana, Pacheco, Lara S., Costa, Patrício, Lawthom, Rebecca, Coimbra, Joaquim Luís
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8324646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00190-z
_version_ 1783731419840774144
author Lucas Casanova, Mariana
Pacheco, Lara S.
Costa, Patrício
Lawthom, Rebecca
Coimbra, Joaquim Luís
author_facet Lucas Casanova, Mariana
Pacheco, Lara S.
Costa, Patrício
Lawthom, Rebecca
Coimbra, Joaquim Luís
author_sort Lucas Casanova, Mariana
collection PubMed
description This study presents the development of the Psychosocial Uncertainty Scale (PS-US), which articulates the perception of uncertainty in the social context and its psychological experience. It was validated with a sample of 1596 students and active professionals (employed and unemployed). By randomly dividing this sample in three sub-samples, the following analyses were performed: exploratory factor analysis (sample one: N = 827); preliminary confirmatory factor analysis identifying the final version of the scale (sample two: N = 382); confirmatory factor analysis (sample three: N = 387). Multi-group analysis was used to assess measurement invariance, gender, sociocultural level, and group of origin invariance, by using samples two and three. Group differences were explored with the complete sample through Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes (MIMIC) Models. Associations between this scale and the Uncertainty response Scale were explored through Structural Equation Modelling. Exploratory and confirmatory analyses’ results showed good internal consistency and overall good psychometric qualities. The scale reached full metric invariance across groups, gender, SCL level and group of origin. Results highlight the sensitivity of the scale towards social vulnerability, proving the existence of sociocultural levels’ effects on experiences of psychosocial uncertainty within working contexts, relationships and community living and self-defeating beliefs; and gender and students versus professionals’ effects on psychosocial uncertainty. Furthermore, the scale associated significantly with Uncertainty Response Scale’s dimensions, specifically with emotional uncertainty, which can be considered a self-defeating strategy. Results suggest that emotional coping strategies, are explained by psychosocial uncertainty by 57%, and so, may have social origins. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41155-021-00190-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8324646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83246462021-08-19 Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Psychosocial Uncertainty Scale Lucas Casanova, Mariana Pacheco, Lara S. Costa, Patrício Lawthom, Rebecca Coimbra, Joaquim Luís Psicol Reflex Crit Research This study presents the development of the Psychosocial Uncertainty Scale (PS-US), which articulates the perception of uncertainty in the social context and its psychological experience. It was validated with a sample of 1596 students and active professionals (employed and unemployed). By randomly dividing this sample in three sub-samples, the following analyses were performed: exploratory factor analysis (sample one: N = 827); preliminary confirmatory factor analysis identifying the final version of the scale (sample two: N = 382); confirmatory factor analysis (sample three: N = 387). Multi-group analysis was used to assess measurement invariance, gender, sociocultural level, and group of origin invariance, by using samples two and three. Group differences were explored with the complete sample through Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes (MIMIC) Models. Associations between this scale and the Uncertainty response Scale were explored through Structural Equation Modelling. Exploratory and confirmatory analyses’ results showed good internal consistency and overall good psychometric qualities. The scale reached full metric invariance across groups, gender, SCL level and group of origin. Results highlight the sensitivity of the scale towards social vulnerability, proving the existence of sociocultural levels’ effects on experiences of psychosocial uncertainty within working contexts, relationships and community living and self-defeating beliefs; and gender and students versus professionals’ effects on psychosocial uncertainty. Furthermore, the scale associated significantly with Uncertainty Response Scale’s dimensions, specifically with emotional uncertainty, which can be considered a self-defeating strategy. Results suggest that emotional coping strategies, are explained by psychosocial uncertainty by 57%, and so, may have social origins. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41155-021-00190-z. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8324646/ /pubmed/34331148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00190-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Lucas Casanova, Mariana
Pacheco, Lara S.
Costa, Patrício
Lawthom, Rebecca
Coimbra, Joaquim Luís
Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Psychosocial Uncertainty Scale
title Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Psychosocial Uncertainty Scale
title_full Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Psychosocial Uncertainty Scale
title_fullStr Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Psychosocial Uncertainty Scale
title_full_unstemmed Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Psychosocial Uncertainty Scale
title_short Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Psychosocial Uncertainty Scale
title_sort factorial validity and measurement invariance of the psychosocial uncertainty scale
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8324646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00190-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lucascasanovamariana factorialvalidityandmeasurementinvarianceofthepsychosocialuncertaintyscale
AT pachecolaras factorialvalidityandmeasurementinvarianceofthepsychosocialuncertaintyscale
AT costapatricio factorialvalidityandmeasurementinvarianceofthepsychosocialuncertaintyscale
AT lawthomrebecca factorialvalidityandmeasurementinvarianceofthepsychosocialuncertaintyscale
AT coimbrajoaquimluis factorialvalidityandmeasurementinvarianceofthepsychosocialuncertaintyscale