Cargando…

COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact

Trial results for two COVID-19 vaccines suggest at least 90% efficacy against symptomatic disease (VE(DIS)). It remains unknown whether this efficacy is mediated by lowering SARS-CoV-2 infection susceptibility (VE(SUSC)) or development of symptoms after infection (VE(SYMP)). We aim to assess and com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swan, David A., Bracis, Chloe, Janes, Holly, Moore, Mia, Matrajt, Laura, Reeves, Daniel B., Burns, Eileen, Donnell, Deborah, Cohen, Myron S., Schiffer, Joshua T., Dimitrov, Dobromir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8324774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34330945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94719-y
_version_ 1783731429255938048
author Swan, David A.
Bracis, Chloe
Janes, Holly
Moore, Mia
Matrajt, Laura
Reeves, Daniel B.
Burns, Eileen
Donnell, Deborah
Cohen, Myron S.
Schiffer, Joshua T.
Dimitrov, Dobromir
author_facet Swan, David A.
Bracis, Chloe
Janes, Holly
Moore, Mia
Matrajt, Laura
Reeves, Daniel B.
Burns, Eileen
Donnell, Deborah
Cohen, Myron S.
Schiffer, Joshua T.
Dimitrov, Dobromir
author_sort Swan, David A.
collection PubMed
description Trial results for two COVID-19 vaccines suggest at least 90% efficacy against symptomatic disease (VE(DIS)). It remains unknown whether this efficacy is mediated by lowering SARS-CoV-2 infection susceptibility (VE(SUSC)) or development of symptoms after infection (VE(SYMP)). We aim to assess and compare the population impact of vaccines with different efficacy profiles (VE(SYMP) and VE(SUSC)) satisfying licensure criteria. We developed a mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, calibrated to data from King County, Washington. Rollout scenarios starting December 2020 were simulated with combinations of VE(SUSC) and VE(SYMP) resulting in up to 100% VE(DIS). We assumed no reduction of infectivity upon infection conditional on presence of symptoms. Proportions of cumulative infections, hospitalizations and deaths prevented over 1 year from vaccination start are reported. Rollouts of 1 M vaccinations (5000 daily) using vaccines with 50% VE(DIS) are projected to prevent 23–46% of infections and 31–46% of deaths over 1 year. In comparison, vaccines with 90% VE(DIS) are projected to prevent 37–64% of infections and 46–64% of deaths over 1 year. In both cases, there is a greater reduction if VE(DIS) is mediated mostly by VE(SUSC). The use of a “symptom reducing” vaccine will require twice as many people vaccinated than a “susceptibility reducing” vaccine with the same 90% VE(DIS) to prevent 50% of the infections and death over 1 year. Delaying the start of the vaccination by 3 months decreases the expected population impact by more than 50%. Vaccines which prevent COVID-19 disease but not SARS-CoV-2 infection, and thereby shift symptomatic infections to asymptomatic infections, will prevent fewer infections and require larger and faster vaccination rollouts to have population impact, compared to vaccines that reduce susceptibility to infection. If uncontrolled transmission across the U.S. continues, then expected vaccination in Spring 2021 will provide only limited benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8324774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83247742021-08-02 COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact Swan, David A. Bracis, Chloe Janes, Holly Moore, Mia Matrajt, Laura Reeves, Daniel B. Burns, Eileen Donnell, Deborah Cohen, Myron S. Schiffer, Joshua T. Dimitrov, Dobromir Sci Rep Article Trial results for two COVID-19 vaccines suggest at least 90% efficacy against symptomatic disease (VE(DIS)). It remains unknown whether this efficacy is mediated by lowering SARS-CoV-2 infection susceptibility (VE(SUSC)) or development of symptoms after infection (VE(SYMP)). We aim to assess and compare the population impact of vaccines with different efficacy profiles (VE(SYMP) and VE(SUSC)) satisfying licensure criteria. We developed a mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, calibrated to data from King County, Washington. Rollout scenarios starting December 2020 were simulated with combinations of VE(SUSC) and VE(SYMP) resulting in up to 100% VE(DIS). We assumed no reduction of infectivity upon infection conditional on presence of symptoms. Proportions of cumulative infections, hospitalizations and deaths prevented over 1 year from vaccination start are reported. Rollouts of 1 M vaccinations (5000 daily) using vaccines with 50% VE(DIS) are projected to prevent 23–46% of infections and 31–46% of deaths over 1 year. In comparison, vaccines with 90% VE(DIS) are projected to prevent 37–64% of infections and 46–64% of deaths over 1 year. In both cases, there is a greater reduction if VE(DIS) is mediated mostly by VE(SUSC). The use of a “symptom reducing” vaccine will require twice as many people vaccinated than a “susceptibility reducing” vaccine with the same 90% VE(DIS) to prevent 50% of the infections and death over 1 year. Delaying the start of the vaccination by 3 months decreases the expected population impact by more than 50%. Vaccines which prevent COVID-19 disease but not SARS-CoV-2 infection, and thereby shift symptomatic infections to asymptomatic infections, will prevent fewer infections and require larger and faster vaccination rollouts to have population impact, compared to vaccines that reduce susceptibility to infection. If uncontrolled transmission across the U.S. continues, then expected vaccination in Spring 2021 will provide only limited benefit. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8324774/ /pubmed/34330945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94719-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Swan, David A.
Bracis, Chloe
Janes, Holly
Moore, Mia
Matrajt, Laura
Reeves, Daniel B.
Burns, Eileen
Donnell, Deborah
Cohen, Myron S.
Schiffer, Joshua T.
Dimitrov, Dobromir
COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact
title COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact
title_full COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact
title_fullStr COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact
title_short COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact
title_sort covid-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8324774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34330945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94719-y
work_keys_str_mv AT swandavida covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact
AT bracischloe covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact
AT janesholly covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact
AT mooremia covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact
AT matrajtlaura covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact
AT reevesdanielb covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact
AT burnseileen covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact
AT donnelldeborah covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact
AT cohenmyrons covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact
AT schifferjoshuat covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact
AT dimitrovdobromir covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact