Cargando…
COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact
Trial results for two COVID-19 vaccines suggest at least 90% efficacy against symptomatic disease (VE(DIS)). It remains unknown whether this efficacy is mediated by lowering SARS-CoV-2 infection susceptibility (VE(SUSC)) or development of symptoms after infection (VE(SYMP)). We aim to assess and com...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8324774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34330945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94719-y |
_version_ | 1783731429255938048 |
---|---|
author | Swan, David A. Bracis, Chloe Janes, Holly Moore, Mia Matrajt, Laura Reeves, Daniel B. Burns, Eileen Donnell, Deborah Cohen, Myron S. Schiffer, Joshua T. Dimitrov, Dobromir |
author_facet | Swan, David A. Bracis, Chloe Janes, Holly Moore, Mia Matrajt, Laura Reeves, Daniel B. Burns, Eileen Donnell, Deborah Cohen, Myron S. Schiffer, Joshua T. Dimitrov, Dobromir |
author_sort | Swan, David A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Trial results for two COVID-19 vaccines suggest at least 90% efficacy against symptomatic disease (VE(DIS)). It remains unknown whether this efficacy is mediated by lowering SARS-CoV-2 infection susceptibility (VE(SUSC)) or development of symptoms after infection (VE(SYMP)). We aim to assess and compare the population impact of vaccines with different efficacy profiles (VE(SYMP) and VE(SUSC)) satisfying licensure criteria. We developed a mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, calibrated to data from King County, Washington. Rollout scenarios starting December 2020 were simulated with combinations of VE(SUSC) and VE(SYMP) resulting in up to 100% VE(DIS). We assumed no reduction of infectivity upon infection conditional on presence of symptoms. Proportions of cumulative infections, hospitalizations and deaths prevented over 1 year from vaccination start are reported. Rollouts of 1 M vaccinations (5000 daily) using vaccines with 50% VE(DIS) are projected to prevent 23–46% of infections and 31–46% of deaths over 1 year. In comparison, vaccines with 90% VE(DIS) are projected to prevent 37–64% of infections and 46–64% of deaths over 1 year. In both cases, there is a greater reduction if VE(DIS) is mediated mostly by VE(SUSC). The use of a “symptom reducing” vaccine will require twice as many people vaccinated than a “susceptibility reducing” vaccine with the same 90% VE(DIS) to prevent 50% of the infections and death over 1 year. Delaying the start of the vaccination by 3 months decreases the expected population impact by more than 50%. Vaccines which prevent COVID-19 disease but not SARS-CoV-2 infection, and thereby shift symptomatic infections to asymptomatic infections, will prevent fewer infections and require larger and faster vaccination rollouts to have population impact, compared to vaccines that reduce susceptibility to infection. If uncontrolled transmission across the U.S. continues, then expected vaccination in Spring 2021 will provide only limited benefit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8324774 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83247742021-08-02 COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact Swan, David A. Bracis, Chloe Janes, Holly Moore, Mia Matrajt, Laura Reeves, Daniel B. Burns, Eileen Donnell, Deborah Cohen, Myron S. Schiffer, Joshua T. Dimitrov, Dobromir Sci Rep Article Trial results for two COVID-19 vaccines suggest at least 90% efficacy against symptomatic disease (VE(DIS)). It remains unknown whether this efficacy is mediated by lowering SARS-CoV-2 infection susceptibility (VE(SUSC)) or development of symptoms after infection (VE(SYMP)). We aim to assess and compare the population impact of vaccines with different efficacy profiles (VE(SYMP) and VE(SUSC)) satisfying licensure criteria. We developed a mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, calibrated to data from King County, Washington. Rollout scenarios starting December 2020 were simulated with combinations of VE(SUSC) and VE(SYMP) resulting in up to 100% VE(DIS). We assumed no reduction of infectivity upon infection conditional on presence of symptoms. Proportions of cumulative infections, hospitalizations and deaths prevented over 1 year from vaccination start are reported. Rollouts of 1 M vaccinations (5000 daily) using vaccines with 50% VE(DIS) are projected to prevent 23–46% of infections and 31–46% of deaths over 1 year. In comparison, vaccines with 90% VE(DIS) are projected to prevent 37–64% of infections and 46–64% of deaths over 1 year. In both cases, there is a greater reduction if VE(DIS) is mediated mostly by VE(SUSC). The use of a “symptom reducing” vaccine will require twice as many people vaccinated than a “susceptibility reducing” vaccine with the same 90% VE(DIS) to prevent 50% of the infections and death over 1 year. Delaying the start of the vaccination by 3 months decreases the expected population impact by more than 50%. Vaccines which prevent COVID-19 disease but not SARS-CoV-2 infection, and thereby shift symptomatic infections to asymptomatic infections, will prevent fewer infections and require larger and faster vaccination rollouts to have population impact, compared to vaccines that reduce susceptibility to infection. If uncontrolled transmission across the U.S. continues, then expected vaccination in Spring 2021 will provide only limited benefit. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8324774/ /pubmed/34330945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94719-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Swan, David A. Bracis, Chloe Janes, Holly Moore, Mia Matrajt, Laura Reeves, Daniel B. Burns, Eileen Donnell, Deborah Cohen, Myron S. Schiffer, Joshua T. Dimitrov, Dobromir COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact |
title | COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact |
title_full | COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact |
title_short | COVID-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact |
title_sort | covid-19 vaccines that reduce symptoms but do not block infection need higher coverage and faster rollout to achieve population impact |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8324774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34330945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94719-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swandavida covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact AT bracischloe covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact AT janesholly covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact AT mooremia covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact AT matrajtlaura covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact AT reevesdanielb covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact AT burnseileen covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact AT donnelldeborah covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact AT cohenmyrons covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact AT schifferjoshuat covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact AT dimitrovdobromir covid19vaccinesthatreducesymptomsbutdonotblockinfectionneedhighercoverageandfasterrollouttoachievepopulationimpact |