Cargando…

Genome Editing Revolution in Life Sciences

Programmable nucleases—ZFNs, TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9—have equipped scientists with an unprecedented ability to modify cells and organisms almost at will, with great implications across life sciences: biology, agriculture, ecology and medicine. Nucleases-based genome editing (aka gene editing) depends...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Alok Kumar, Ramalingam, Sivaprakash, Rao, Desirazu N., Chandrasegaran, Srinivasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer India 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325037/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12045-021-1195-z
_version_ 1783731487178227712
author Singh, Alok Kumar
Ramalingam, Sivaprakash
Rao, Desirazu N.
Chandrasegaran, Srinivasan
author_facet Singh, Alok Kumar
Ramalingam, Sivaprakash
Rao, Desirazu N.
Chandrasegaran, Srinivasan
author_sort Singh, Alok Kumar
collection PubMed
description Programmable nucleases—ZFNs, TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9—have equipped scientists with an unprecedented ability to modify cells and organisms almost at will, with great implications across life sciences: biology, agriculture, ecology and medicine. Nucleases-based genome editing (aka gene editing) depends on cellular responses to a targeted double-strand break (DSB). The first truly targetable reagents were zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) showing that arbitrary DNA sequences within a mammalian genome, could be addressed by protein engineering, ushering in the era of genome editing. ZFNs that are fusions of zinc finger proteins (ZFPs) and FokI cleavage domain, resulted from the basic research on Type IIs FokI restriction enzyme, which showed a bipartite structure with a separable DNA-binding domain and a non-specific cleavage domain. Studies on 3-finger ZFNs established that the preferred substrates were paired binding sites, which doubled the size of the target recognition sequence from 9 to 18 bp that is large enough to specify a unique genomic locus in plant and mammalian cells, including human cells. Subsequently, a ZFN-induced DSB was shown to stimulate homologous recombination in frog eggs. Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) that are based on bacterial TALEs fused to FokI cleavage domain expanded the capability. ZFNs and TALENs have been successfully used to modify a multitude of recalcitrant organisms and cell types that were unapproachable previously attesting to the success of protein engineering, long before the arrival of CRISPR. The recent technique to deliver a targeted DSB to cellular genomes are RNA-guided nucleases as exemplified by the Type II prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas9 system. Unlike ZFNs and TALENs that use protein motifs for DNA sequence recognition, CRISPR-Cas9 depends on RNA-DNA recognition. The advantages of the CRISPR-Cas9 system, which include ease of RNA design for new targets and dependence on a single constant Cas9 protein, have led to its wide adoption by research labs around the world. The 2020 Nobel Prize for Chemistry was awarded to Jennifer Doudna and Emmanualle Charpentier for harnessing CRISPR-Cas9 system to provide a simplified technique for genome editing. The programmable nucleases have also been shown to cut at off-target sites with mutagenic consequences, which is a serious concern for human therapeutic applications. Therefore, applications of genome editing technologies to human therapeutics will ultimately depend on risk versus benefit analysis and informed consent
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8325037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer India
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83250372021-08-02 Genome Editing Revolution in Life Sciences Singh, Alok Kumar Ramalingam, Sivaprakash Rao, Desirazu N. Chandrasegaran, Srinivasan Reson General Article Programmable nucleases—ZFNs, TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9—have equipped scientists with an unprecedented ability to modify cells and organisms almost at will, with great implications across life sciences: biology, agriculture, ecology and medicine. Nucleases-based genome editing (aka gene editing) depends on cellular responses to a targeted double-strand break (DSB). The first truly targetable reagents were zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) showing that arbitrary DNA sequences within a mammalian genome, could be addressed by protein engineering, ushering in the era of genome editing. ZFNs that are fusions of zinc finger proteins (ZFPs) and FokI cleavage domain, resulted from the basic research on Type IIs FokI restriction enzyme, which showed a bipartite structure with a separable DNA-binding domain and a non-specific cleavage domain. Studies on 3-finger ZFNs established that the preferred substrates were paired binding sites, which doubled the size of the target recognition sequence from 9 to 18 bp that is large enough to specify a unique genomic locus in plant and mammalian cells, including human cells. Subsequently, a ZFN-induced DSB was shown to stimulate homologous recombination in frog eggs. Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) that are based on bacterial TALEs fused to FokI cleavage domain expanded the capability. ZFNs and TALENs have been successfully used to modify a multitude of recalcitrant organisms and cell types that were unapproachable previously attesting to the success of protein engineering, long before the arrival of CRISPR. The recent technique to deliver a targeted DSB to cellular genomes are RNA-guided nucleases as exemplified by the Type II prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas9 system. Unlike ZFNs and TALENs that use protein motifs for DNA sequence recognition, CRISPR-Cas9 depends on RNA-DNA recognition. The advantages of the CRISPR-Cas9 system, which include ease of RNA design for new targets and dependence on a single constant Cas9 protein, have led to its wide adoption by research labs around the world. The 2020 Nobel Prize for Chemistry was awarded to Jennifer Doudna and Emmanualle Charpentier for harnessing CRISPR-Cas9 system to provide a simplified technique for genome editing. The programmable nucleases have also been shown to cut at off-target sites with mutagenic consequences, which is a serious concern for human therapeutic applications. Therefore, applications of genome editing technologies to human therapeutics will ultimately depend on risk versus benefit analysis and informed consent Springer India 2021-07-31 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8325037/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12045-021-1195-z Text en © Indian Academy of Sciences 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle General Article
Singh, Alok Kumar
Ramalingam, Sivaprakash
Rao, Desirazu N.
Chandrasegaran, Srinivasan
Genome Editing Revolution in Life Sciences
title Genome Editing Revolution in Life Sciences
title_full Genome Editing Revolution in Life Sciences
title_fullStr Genome Editing Revolution in Life Sciences
title_full_unstemmed Genome Editing Revolution in Life Sciences
title_short Genome Editing Revolution in Life Sciences
title_sort genome editing revolution in life sciences
topic General Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325037/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12045-021-1195-z
work_keys_str_mv AT singhalokkumar genomeeditingrevolutioninlifesciences
AT ramalingamsivaprakash genomeeditingrevolutioninlifesciences
AT raodesirazun genomeeditingrevolutioninlifesciences
AT chandrasegaransrinivasan genomeeditingrevolutioninlifesciences