Cargando…

Smith’s paradox of price and negotiation: Empirical evidence from India

Diamond-water paradox has enticed the human mind for generations. Adam Smith gave it a new twist in the Wealth of Nations that serves as the basis of all modern valuation theories. This paper goes back to the original writing of Smith to identify paradoxes and then empirical test in the context of l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dey Biswas, Sattwick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12232-021-00378-w
_version_ 1783731488807714816
author Dey Biswas, Sattwick
author_facet Dey Biswas, Sattwick
author_sort Dey Biswas, Sattwick
collection PubMed
description Diamond-water paradox has enticed the human mind for generations. Adam Smith gave it a new twist in the Wealth of Nations that serves as the basis of all modern valuation theories. This paper goes back to the original writing of Smith to identify paradoxes and then empirical test in the context of land value. The review of original texts and empirical evidence suggests the existence of a third principle, i.e. “riches and poverty of those who demand”. This indication demands a re-evaluation of Smith’s paradox of value and has implication of modern science of valuation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8325044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83250442021-08-02 Smith’s paradox of price and negotiation: Empirical evidence from India Dey Biswas, Sattwick Int Rev Econ Research Article Diamond-water paradox has enticed the human mind for generations. Adam Smith gave it a new twist in the Wealth of Nations that serves as the basis of all modern valuation theories. This paper goes back to the original writing of Smith to identify paradoxes and then empirical test in the context of land value. The review of original texts and empirical evidence suggests the existence of a third principle, i.e. “riches and poverty of those who demand”. This indication demands a re-evaluation of Smith’s paradox of value and has implication of modern science of valuation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-31 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8325044/ /pubmed/34367352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12232-021-00378-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dey Biswas, Sattwick
Smith’s paradox of price and negotiation: Empirical evidence from India
title Smith’s paradox of price and negotiation: Empirical evidence from India
title_full Smith’s paradox of price and negotiation: Empirical evidence from India
title_fullStr Smith’s paradox of price and negotiation: Empirical evidence from India
title_full_unstemmed Smith’s paradox of price and negotiation: Empirical evidence from India
title_short Smith’s paradox of price and negotiation: Empirical evidence from India
title_sort smith’s paradox of price and negotiation: empirical evidence from india
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12232-021-00378-w
work_keys_str_mv AT deybiswassattwick smithsparadoxofpriceandnegotiationempiricalevidencefromindia