Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) compared with cancer antigen 125 (CA125), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) score to di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sun Seong, Park, Ji Sun, Lee, Kyung Bok, Jeong, Dae Hoon, Byun, Jung Mi, Lee, Seok Mo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33906304
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.4.1123
_version_ 1783731502925742080
author Lee, Sun Seong
Park, Ji Sun
Lee, Kyung Bok
Jeong, Dae Hoon
Byun, Jung Mi
Lee, Seok Mo
author_facet Lee, Sun Seong
Park, Ji Sun
Lee, Kyung Bok
Jeong, Dae Hoon
Byun, Jung Mi
Lee, Seok Mo
author_sort Lee, Sun Seong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) compared with cancer antigen 125 (CA125), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) score to distinguish epithelial ovarian cancer from benign tumors. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with pelvic masses, who underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT, CA125, and HE4 before surgery between January 2015 and December 2018, were included in this retrospective study. The diagnostic performance of CA125, HE4, ROMA score, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) to differentiate epithelial ovarian cancer from benign pelvic tumors was examined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Among the 46 patients, 28 were cases of ovarian cancers and 18 were of benign. The mean values of CA125, HE4, ROMA score, and SUVmax were significantly higher in the ovarian cancer group than the benign group. In early cancer stages (stages I and II), Area under the curve for SUVmax was significantly higher than CA125 and ROMA score (0.778 for CA125, 0.753 for HE4, 0.682 for ROMA score, and 0.922 for SUVmax). CONCLUSION: SUVmax using F-18 FDG PET/CT showed a high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating epithelial ovarian cancer from benign pelvic tumors, including early stage ovarian cancer. F-18 FDG PET/CT can be a useful modality for the assessment of pelvic mass.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8325115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83251152021-08-06 Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Lee, Sun Seong Park, Ji Sun Lee, Kyung Bok Jeong, Dae Hoon Byun, Jung Mi Lee, Seok Mo Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) compared with cancer antigen 125 (CA125), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) score to distinguish epithelial ovarian cancer from benign tumors. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with pelvic masses, who underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT, CA125, and HE4 before surgery between January 2015 and December 2018, were included in this retrospective study. The diagnostic performance of CA125, HE4, ROMA score, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) to differentiate epithelial ovarian cancer from benign pelvic tumors was examined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Among the 46 patients, 28 were cases of ovarian cancers and 18 were of benign. The mean values of CA125, HE4, ROMA score, and SUVmax were significantly higher in the ovarian cancer group than the benign group. In early cancer stages (stages I and II), Area under the curve for SUVmax was significantly higher than CA125 and ROMA score (0.778 for CA125, 0.753 for HE4, 0.682 for ROMA score, and 0.922 for SUVmax). CONCLUSION: SUVmax using F-18 FDG PET/CT showed a high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating epithelial ovarian cancer from benign pelvic tumors, including early stage ovarian cancer. F-18 FDG PET/CT can be a useful modality for the assessment of pelvic mass. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8325115/ /pubmed/33906304 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.4.1123 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Sun Seong
Park, Ji Sun
Lee, Kyung Bok
Jeong, Dae Hoon
Byun, Jung Mi
Lee, Seok Mo
Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_full Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_short Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_sort diagnostic performance of f-18 fdg pet/ct compared with ca125, he4, and roma for epithelial ovarian cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33906304
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.4.1123
work_keys_str_mv AT leesunseong diagnosticperformanceoff18fdgpetctcomparedwithca125he4andromaforepithelialovariancancer
AT parkjisun diagnosticperformanceoff18fdgpetctcomparedwithca125he4andromaforepithelialovariancancer
AT leekyungbok diagnosticperformanceoff18fdgpetctcomparedwithca125he4andromaforepithelialovariancancer
AT jeongdaehoon diagnosticperformanceoff18fdgpetctcomparedwithca125he4andromaforepithelialovariancancer
AT byunjungmi diagnosticperformanceoff18fdgpetctcomparedwithca125he4andromaforepithelialovariancancer
AT leeseokmo diagnosticperformanceoff18fdgpetctcomparedwithca125he4andromaforepithelialovariancancer