Cargando…
Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) compared with cancer antigen 125 (CA125), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) score to di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33906304 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.4.1123 |
_version_ | 1783731502925742080 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Sun Seong Park, Ji Sun Lee, Kyung Bok Jeong, Dae Hoon Byun, Jung Mi Lee, Seok Mo |
author_facet | Lee, Sun Seong Park, Ji Sun Lee, Kyung Bok Jeong, Dae Hoon Byun, Jung Mi Lee, Seok Mo |
author_sort | Lee, Sun Seong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) compared with cancer antigen 125 (CA125), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) score to distinguish epithelial ovarian cancer from benign tumors. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with pelvic masses, who underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT, CA125, and HE4 before surgery between January 2015 and December 2018, were included in this retrospective study. The diagnostic performance of CA125, HE4, ROMA score, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) to differentiate epithelial ovarian cancer from benign pelvic tumors was examined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Among the 46 patients, 28 were cases of ovarian cancers and 18 were of benign. The mean values of CA125, HE4, ROMA score, and SUVmax were significantly higher in the ovarian cancer group than the benign group. In early cancer stages (stages I and II), Area under the curve for SUVmax was significantly higher than CA125 and ROMA score (0.778 for CA125, 0.753 for HE4, 0.682 for ROMA score, and 0.922 for SUVmax). CONCLUSION: SUVmax using F-18 FDG PET/CT showed a high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating epithelial ovarian cancer from benign pelvic tumors, including early stage ovarian cancer. F-18 FDG PET/CT can be a useful modality for the assessment of pelvic mass. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8325115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83251152021-08-06 Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Lee, Sun Seong Park, Ji Sun Lee, Kyung Bok Jeong, Dae Hoon Byun, Jung Mi Lee, Seok Mo Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) compared with cancer antigen 125 (CA125), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) score to distinguish epithelial ovarian cancer from benign tumors. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with pelvic masses, who underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT, CA125, and HE4 before surgery between January 2015 and December 2018, were included in this retrospective study. The diagnostic performance of CA125, HE4, ROMA score, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) to differentiate epithelial ovarian cancer from benign pelvic tumors was examined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Among the 46 patients, 28 were cases of ovarian cancers and 18 were of benign. The mean values of CA125, HE4, ROMA score, and SUVmax were significantly higher in the ovarian cancer group than the benign group. In early cancer stages (stages I and II), Area under the curve for SUVmax was significantly higher than CA125 and ROMA score (0.778 for CA125, 0.753 for HE4, 0.682 for ROMA score, and 0.922 for SUVmax). CONCLUSION: SUVmax using F-18 FDG PET/CT showed a high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating epithelial ovarian cancer from benign pelvic tumors, including early stage ovarian cancer. F-18 FDG PET/CT can be a useful modality for the assessment of pelvic mass. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8325115/ /pubmed/33906304 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.4.1123 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Sun Seong Park, Ji Sun Lee, Kyung Bok Jeong, Dae Hoon Byun, Jung Mi Lee, Seok Mo Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer |
title | Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer |
title_full | Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer |
title_short | Diagnostic Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT Compared with CA125, HE4, and ROMA for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of f-18 fdg pet/ct compared with ca125, he4, and roma for epithelial ovarian cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33906304 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.4.1123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesunseong diagnosticperformanceoff18fdgpetctcomparedwithca125he4andromaforepithelialovariancancer AT parkjisun diagnosticperformanceoff18fdgpetctcomparedwithca125he4andromaforepithelialovariancancer AT leekyungbok diagnosticperformanceoff18fdgpetctcomparedwithca125he4andromaforepithelialovariancancer AT jeongdaehoon diagnosticperformanceoff18fdgpetctcomparedwithca125he4andromaforepithelialovariancancer AT byunjungmi diagnosticperformanceoff18fdgpetctcomparedwithca125he4andromaforepithelialovariancancer AT leeseokmo diagnosticperformanceoff18fdgpetctcomparedwithca125he4andromaforepithelialovariancancer |