Cargando…
Antiviral treatment could not provide clinical benefit in management of mild COVID-19: A Retrospective Experience from Field hospital
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected over 145 million infected people and 3 million deaths worldwide. There has been limited data to recommend either for or against use of antiviral regimens in mild COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between mild...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34419704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.07.019 |
_version_ | 1783731550515363840 |
---|---|
author | Aumpan, Natsuda Vilaichone, Ratha-korn Ratana-Amornpin, Sarita Teerakapibal, Surat Toochinda, Pisanu Witoonchart, Gasinee Nitikraipot, Surapon |
author_facet | Aumpan, Natsuda Vilaichone, Ratha-korn Ratana-Amornpin, Sarita Teerakapibal, Surat Toochinda, Pisanu Witoonchart, Gasinee Nitikraipot, Surapon |
author_sort | Aumpan, Natsuda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected over 145 million infected people and 3 million deaths worldwide. There has been limited data to recommend either for or against use of antiviral regimens in mild COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between mild COVID-19 patients receiving antiviral drugs and those without. METHOD: Thai patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at field hospital affiliated to Thammasat University Hospital, Thailand were evaluated between January 1, 2020 and April 13, 2021. Patients’ data, clinical presentation, past medical history, laboratory results, and treatment outcomes were extensively reviewed. RESULTS: Five hundred patients with positive tests were included in the study. The mean age was 35.9 years; 46% males. There were 225 (45%), 207 (41.4%), 44 (8.8%), 18 (3.6%), 6 (1.2%) patients with asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe, and critical COVID-19, respectively. Of 207 mild COVID-19 patients, 9 (4.3%) received lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/ritonavir, 17 (8.2%) received favipiravir, while 175 (84.5%) had only supportive care. Mild COVID-19 patients receiving antiviral treatment had longer median length of hospital stay [13 days (IQR 11–14) vs. 10 days (IQR 8–12), p < 0.001] than patients having only supportive treatment. Antiviral drug use was significantly associated with longer hospital stay (>10 days) in mild COVID-19 patients (OR 5.52; 95%CI 2.12–14.40, p < 0.001). Adverse drug reactions such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, and hepatitis were also demonstrated in our COVID-19 patients with antiviral treatments. Majority of patients (97.6%) recovered without any complications and were discharged home. Two deaths were caused by acute respiratory distress syndrome from severe COVID-19 pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Antiviral treatment could not provide superior clinical outcomes to supportive care in mild COVID-19 patients. Mild COVID-19 patients receiving antiviral medication had longer length of hospital stay than those without. Standard supportive care and regular monitoring of disease progression might be keys for successful management of mild COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8325384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83253842021-08-02 Antiviral treatment could not provide clinical benefit in management of mild COVID-19: A Retrospective Experience from Field hospital Aumpan, Natsuda Vilaichone, Ratha-korn Ratana-Amornpin, Sarita Teerakapibal, Surat Toochinda, Pisanu Witoonchart, Gasinee Nitikraipot, Surapon J Infect Public Health Original Article BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected over 145 million infected people and 3 million deaths worldwide. There has been limited data to recommend either for or against use of antiviral regimens in mild COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between mild COVID-19 patients receiving antiviral drugs and those without. METHOD: Thai patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at field hospital affiliated to Thammasat University Hospital, Thailand were evaluated between January 1, 2020 and April 13, 2021. Patients’ data, clinical presentation, past medical history, laboratory results, and treatment outcomes were extensively reviewed. RESULTS: Five hundred patients with positive tests were included in the study. The mean age was 35.9 years; 46% males. There were 225 (45%), 207 (41.4%), 44 (8.8%), 18 (3.6%), 6 (1.2%) patients with asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe, and critical COVID-19, respectively. Of 207 mild COVID-19 patients, 9 (4.3%) received lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/ritonavir, 17 (8.2%) received favipiravir, while 175 (84.5%) had only supportive care. Mild COVID-19 patients receiving antiviral treatment had longer median length of hospital stay [13 days (IQR 11–14) vs. 10 days (IQR 8–12), p < 0.001] than patients having only supportive treatment. Antiviral drug use was significantly associated with longer hospital stay (>10 days) in mild COVID-19 patients (OR 5.52; 95%CI 2.12–14.40, p < 0.001). Adverse drug reactions such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, and hepatitis were also demonstrated in our COVID-19 patients with antiviral treatments. Majority of patients (97.6%) recovered without any complications and were discharged home. Two deaths were caused by acute respiratory distress syndrome from severe COVID-19 pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Antiviral treatment could not provide superior clinical outcomes to supportive care in mild COVID-19 patients. Mild COVID-19 patients receiving antiviral medication had longer length of hospital stay than those without. Standard supportive care and regular monitoring of disease progression might be keys for successful management of mild COVID-19. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. 2021-09 2021-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8325384/ /pubmed/34419704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.07.019 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Aumpan, Natsuda Vilaichone, Ratha-korn Ratana-Amornpin, Sarita Teerakapibal, Surat Toochinda, Pisanu Witoonchart, Gasinee Nitikraipot, Surapon Antiviral treatment could not provide clinical benefit in management of mild COVID-19: A Retrospective Experience from Field hospital |
title | Antiviral treatment could not provide clinical benefit in management of mild COVID-19: A Retrospective Experience from Field hospital |
title_full | Antiviral treatment could not provide clinical benefit in management of mild COVID-19: A Retrospective Experience from Field hospital |
title_fullStr | Antiviral treatment could not provide clinical benefit in management of mild COVID-19: A Retrospective Experience from Field hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Antiviral treatment could not provide clinical benefit in management of mild COVID-19: A Retrospective Experience from Field hospital |
title_short | Antiviral treatment could not provide clinical benefit in management of mild COVID-19: A Retrospective Experience from Field hospital |
title_sort | antiviral treatment could not provide clinical benefit in management of mild covid-19: a retrospective experience from field hospital |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34419704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2021.07.019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aumpannatsuda antiviraltreatmentcouldnotprovideclinicalbenefitinmanagementofmildcovid19aretrospectiveexperiencefromfieldhospital AT vilaichonerathakorn antiviraltreatmentcouldnotprovideclinicalbenefitinmanagementofmildcovid19aretrospectiveexperiencefromfieldhospital AT ratanaamornpinsarita antiviraltreatmentcouldnotprovideclinicalbenefitinmanagementofmildcovid19aretrospectiveexperiencefromfieldhospital AT teerakapibalsurat antiviraltreatmentcouldnotprovideclinicalbenefitinmanagementofmildcovid19aretrospectiveexperiencefromfieldhospital AT toochindapisanu antiviraltreatmentcouldnotprovideclinicalbenefitinmanagementofmildcovid19aretrospectiveexperiencefromfieldhospital AT witoonchartgasinee antiviraltreatmentcouldnotprovideclinicalbenefitinmanagementofmildcovid19aretrospectiveexperiencefromfieldhospital AT nitikraipotsurapon antiviraltreatmentcouldnotprovideclinicalbenefitinmanagementofmildcovid19aretrospectiveexperiencefromfieldhospital |