Cargando…

Words Representing Numeric Probabilities in Medical Writing Are Ambiguous and Misinterpreted

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Words of estimative probability are used in medical writing. Authors know the number they intend the word to mean, readers do not. The objective of this study is to assess the variability of words having numeric meaning to medical doctors. DESIGN: A survey of 131 American t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ott, Douglas E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34354332
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00034
_version_ 1783731571062210560
author Ott, Douglas E.
author_facet Ott, Douglas E.
author_sort Ott, Douglas E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Words of estimative probability are used in medical writing. Authors know the number they intend the word to mean, readers do not. The objective of this study is to assess the variability of words having numeric meaning to medical doctors. DESIGN: A survey of 131 American trained MD’s and DO’s was done regarding their interpretation of 27 commonly used words of the estimative probability they placed on each word. METHODS: Statistical assessments were done to evaluate specific word meaning as a number or range to physicians and compared to each other’s interpretation. RESULTS: For 19 of the 27 words had a 30% +/− (60% variance) of interpretation. Twenty-five of the 27 had less than 38% agreement on numeric meaning. Only two words had more than 74% numeric agreement. CONCLUSION: Words of estimative probability have widely varied interpretations to physicians. This makes interpretation of those words incomprehensible for scientific meaning resulting in communication without comprehension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8325478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83254782021-08-04 Words Representing Numeric Probabilities in Medical Writing Are Ambiguous and Misinterpreted Ott, Douglas E. JSLS Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Words of estimative probability are used in medical writing. Authors know the number they intend the word to mean, readers do not. The objective of this study is to assess the variability of words having numeric meaning to medical doctors. DESIGN: A survey of 131 American trained MD’s and DO’s was done regarding their interpretation of 27 commonly used words of the estimative probability they placed on each word. METHODS: Statistical assessments were done to evaluate specific word meaning as a number or range to physicians and compared to each other’s interpretation. RESULTS: For 19 of the 27 words had a 30% +/− (60% variance) of interpretation. Twenty-five of the 27 had less than 38% agreement on numeric meaning. Only two words had more than 74% numeric agreement. CONCLUSION: Words of estimative probability have widely varied interpretations to physicians. This makes interpretation of those words incomprehensible for scientific meaning resulting in communication without comprehension. The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8325478/ /pubmed/34354332 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00034 Text en © 2021 by SLS, Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/) ), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ott, Douglas E.
Words Representing Numeric Probabilities in Medical Writing Are Ambiguous and Misinterpreted
title Words Representing Numeric Probabilities in Medical Writing Are Ambiguous and Misinterpreted
title_full Words Representing Numeric Probabilities in Medical Writing Are Ambiguous and Misinterpreted
title_fullStr Words Representing Numeric Probabilities in Medical Writing Are Ambiguous and Misinterpreted
title_full_unstemmed Words Representing Numeric Probabilities in Medical Writing Are Ambiguous and Misinterpreted
title_short Words Representing Numeric Probabilities in Medical Writing Are Ambiguous and Misinterpreted
title_sort words representing numeric probabilities in medical writing are ambiguous and misinterpreted
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34354332
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00034
work_keys_str_mv AT ottdouglase wordsrepresentingnumericprobabilitiesinmedicalwritingareambiguousandmisinterpreted