Cargando…

Assessing risk of damage to posterior ankle structures during total ankle arthroplasty

AIMS: Arthroplasty has become increasingly popular to treat end-stage ankle arthritis. Iatrogenic posterior neurovascular and tendinous injury have been described from saw cuts. However, it is hypothesized that posterior ankle structures could be damaged by inserting tibial guide pins too deeply and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Callaghan, Christopher J., McKinley, John C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34233473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.27.BJO-2021-0057.R1
_version_ 1783731667047809024
author Callaghan, Christopher J.
McKinley, John C.
author_facet Callaghan, Christopher J.
McKinley, John C.
author_sort Callaghan, Christopher J.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Arthroplasty has become increasingly popular to treat end-stage ankle arthritis. Iatrogenic posterior neurovascular and tendinous injury have been described from saw cuts. However, it is hypothesized that posterior ankle structures could be damaged by inserting tibial guide pins too deeply and be a potential cause of residual hindfoot pain. METHODS: The preparation steps for ankle arthroplasty were performed using the Infinity total ankle system in five right-sided cadaveric ankles. All tibial guide pins were intentionally inserted past the posterior tibial cortex for assessment. All posterior ankles were subsequently dissected, with the primary endpoint being the presence of direct contact between the structure and pin. RESULTS: All pin locations confer a risk of damaging posterior ankle structures, with all posterior ankle structures except the flexor hallucis longus tendon being contacted by at least one pin. Centrally-aligned transcortical pins were more likely to contact posteromedial neurovascular structures. CONCLUSION: These findings support our hypothesis that tibial guide pins pose a considerable risk of contacting and potentially damaging posterior ankle structures during ankle arthroplasty. This study is the first of its kind to assess this risk in the Infinity total ankle system. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):503–508.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8325975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83259752021-08-11 Assessing risk of damage to posterior ankle structures during total ankle arthroplasty Callaghan, Christopher J. McKinley, John C. Bone Jt Open Foot & Ankle AIMS: Arthroplasty has become increasingly popular to treat end-stage ankle arthritis. Iatrogenic posterior neurovascular and tendinous injury have been described from saw cuts. However, it is hypothesized that posterior ankle structures could be damaged by inserting tibial guide pins too deeply and be a potential cause of residual hindfoot pain. METHODS: The preparation steps for ankle arthroplasty were performed using the Infinity total ankle system in five right-sided cadaveric ankles. All tibial guide pins were intentionally inserted past the posterior tibial cortex for assessment. All posterior ankles were subsequently dissected, with the primary endpoint being the presence of direct contact between the structure and pin. RESULTS: All pin locations confer a risk of damaging posterior ankle structures, with all posterior ankle structures except the flexor hallucis longus tendon being contacted by at least one pin. Centrally-aligned transcortical pins were more likely to contact posteromedial neurovascular structures. CONCLUSION: These findings support our hypothesis that tibial guide pins pose a considerable risk of contacting and potentially damaging posterior ankle structures during ankle arthroplasty. This study is the first of its kind to assess this risk in the Infinity total ankle system. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):503–508. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8325975/ /pubmed/34233473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.27.BJO-2021-0057.R1 Text en © 2021 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Foot & Ankle
Callaghan, Christopher J.
McKinley, John C.
Assessing risk of damage to posterior ankle structures during total ankle arthroplasty
title Assessing risk of damage to posterior ankle structures during total ankle arthroplasty
title_full Assessing risk of damage to posterior ankle structures during total ankle arthroplasty
title_fullStr Assessing risk of damage to posterior ankle structures during total ankle arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Assessing risk of damage to posterior ankle structures during total ankle arthroplasty
title_short Assessing risk of damage to posterior ankle structures during total ankle arthroplasty
title_sort assessing risk of damage to posterior ankle structures during total ankle arthroplasty
topic Foot & Ankle
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34233473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.27.BJO-2021-0057.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT callaghanchristopherj assessingriskofdamagetoposterioranklestructuresduringtotalanklearthroplasty
AT mckinleyjohnc assessingriskofdamagetoposterioranklestructuresduringtotalanklearthroplasty