Cargando…

The “drive to eat” hypothesis: energy expenditure and fat-free mass but not adiposity are associated with milk intake and energy intake in 12 week infants

BACKGROUND: Recent work has challenged the long-held assumption that appetite functions to maintain stable body mass and fat mass (FM), suggesting instead that appetite matches food intake to energy expenditure and its correlate, fat-free mass (FFM). Whether this scenario applies to young infants, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wells, Jonathan C, Davies, Peter S, Hopkins, Mark, Blundell, John E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33851194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab067
_version_ 1783731683654107136
author Wells, Jonathan C
Davies, Peter S
Hopkins, Mark
Blundell, John E
author_facet Wells, Jonathan C
Davies, Peter S
Hopkins, Mark
Blundell, John E
author_sort Wells, Jonathan C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent work has challenged the long-held assumption that appetite functions to maintain stable body mass and fat mass (FM), suggesting instead that appetite matches food intake to energy expenditure and its correlate, fat-free mass (FFM). Whether this scenario applies to young infants, in chronic positive energy balance, remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To test associations of components of energy expenditure and body composition with milk intake (MI) and energy intake (EI) in 12-week infants, by reanalyzing published cross-sectional data. METHODS: Data were available for 48 infants. In addition to anthropometric measurements, we assessed MI and EI by test-weighing, sleeping metabolic rate (SMR) by indirect calorimetry, and FFM, FM, and total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water. Mean parental height was calculated as a marker of infant growth drive. Correlation and multiple regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: MI and EI correlated with FFM (r = 0.47 and 0.57, respectively; P < 0.01), but not FM (P > 0.6). MI and EI correlated with SMR (r = 0.42 and 0.53, respectively; P < 0.01) and TEE (r = 0.50 and 0.49, respectively; P < 0.01). SMR and TEE correlated with FFM (r = 0.41 and 0.42, respectively; P < 0.01), but not FM (P > 0.2). In a multiple regression analysis, MI was independently associated with TEE (partial r = 0.39) and FFM (partial r = 0.35). EI showed similar associations. Mean parental height was correlated with weight gain, MI, and EI. CONCLUSIONS: As in adults, MI and EI in young infants were strongly associated with FFM and with total and sleeping components of energy expenditure, but not with fatness. The infant's growth drive contributed to these associations. This suggests that appetite is regulated by the rate of energy expenditure, the size of energy-using tissues, and tissue deposition rate, and that the high levels of body fat characteristic of infants may not constrain weight gain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8326050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83260502021-08-03 The “drive to eat” hypothesis: energy expenditure and fat-free mass but not adiposity are associated with milk intake and energy intake in 12 week infants Wells, Jonathan C Davies, Peter S Hopkins, Mark Blundell, John E Am J Clin Nutr Original Research Communications BACKGROUND: Recent work has challenged the long-held assumption that appetite functions to maintain stable body mass and fat mass (FM), suggesting instead that appetite matches food intake to energy expenditure and its correlate, fat-free mass (FFM). Whether this scenario applies to young infants, in chronic positive energy balance, remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To test associations of components of energy expenditure and body composition with milk intake (MI) and energy intake (EI) in 12-week infants, by reanalyzing published cross-sectional data. METHODS: Data were available for 48 infants. In addition to anthropometric measurements, we assessed MI and EI by test-weighing, sleeping metabolic rate (SMR) by indirect calorimetry, and FFM, FM, and total energy expenditure (TEE) by doubly labeled water. Mean parental height was calculated as a marker of infant growth drive. Correlation and multiple regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: MI and EI correlated with FFM (r = 0.47 and 0.57, respectively; P < 0.01), but not FM (P > 0.6). MI and EI correlated with SMR (r = 0.42 and 0.53, respectively; P < 0.01) and TEE (r = 0.50 and 0.49, respectively; P < 0.01). SMR and TEE correlated with FFM (r = 0.41 and 0.42, respectively; P < 0.01), but not FM (P > 0.2). In a multiple regression analysis, MI was independently associated with TEE (partial r = 0.39) and FFM (partial r = 0.35). EI showed similar associations. Mean parental height was correlated with weight gain, MI, and EI. CONCLUSIONS: As in adults, MI and EI in young infants were strongly associated with FFM and with total and sleeping components of energy expenditure, but not with fatness. The infant's growth drive contributed to these associations. This suggests that appetite is regulated by the rate of energy expenditure, the size of energy-using tissues, and tissue deposition rate, and that the high levels of body fat characteristic of infants may not constrain weight gain. Oxford University Press 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8326050/ /pubmed/33851194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab067 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Original Research Communications
Wells, Jonathan C
Davies, Peter S
Hopkins, Mark
Blundell, John E
The “drive to eat” hypothesis: energy expenditure and fat-free mass but not adiposity are associated with milk intake and energy intake in 12 week infants
title The “drive to eat” hypothesis: energy expenditure and fat-free mass but not adiposity are associated with milk intake and energy intake in 12 week infants
title_full The “drive to eat” hypothesis: energy expenditure and fat-free mass but not adiposity are associated with milk intake and energy intake in 12 week infants
title_fullStr The “drive to eat” hypothesis: energy expenditure and fat-free mass but not adiposity are associated with milk intake and energy intake in 12 week infants
title_full_unstemmed The “drive to eat” hypothesis: energy expenditure and fat-free mass but not adiposity are associated with milk intake and energy intake in 12 week infants
title_short The “drive to eat” hypothesis: energy expenditure and fat-free mass but not adiposity are associated with milk intake and energy intake in 12 week infants
title_sort “drive to eat” hypothesis: energy expenditure and fat-free mass but not adiposity are associated with milk intake and energy intake in 12 week infants
topic Original Research Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33851194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab067
work_keys_str_mv AT wellsjonathanc thedrivetoeathypothesisenergyexpenditureandfatfreemassbutnotadiposityareassociatedwithmilkintakeandenergyintakein12weekinfants
AT daviespeters thedrivetoeathypothesisenergyexpenditureandfatfreemassbutnotadiposityareassociatedwithmilkintakeandenergyintakein12weekinfants
AT hopkinsmark thedrivetoeathypothesisenergyexpenditureandfatfreemassbutnotadiposityareassociatedwithmilkintakeandenergyintakein12weekinfants
AT blundelljohne thedrivetoeathypothesisenergyexpenditureandfatfreemassbutnotadiposityareassociatedwithmilkintakeandenergyintakein12weekinfants
AT wellsjonathanc drivetoeathypothesisenergyexpenditureandfatfreemassbutnotadiposityareassociatedwithmilkintakeandenergyintakein12weekinfants
AT daviespeters drivetoeathypothesisenergyexpenditureandfatfreemassbutnotadiposityareassociatedwithmilkintakeandenergyintakein12weekinfants
AT hopkinsmark drivetoeathypothesisenergyexpenditureandfatfreemassbutnotadiposityareassociatedwithmilkintakeandenergyintakein12weekinfants
AT blundelljohne drivetoeathypothesisenergyexpenditureandfatfreemassbutnotadiposityareassociatedwithmilkintakeandenergyintakein12weekinfants