Cargando…
Does Contrast Dose Based in Lean body Weight Allow Lesser Volumes on High BMI Patients for CT Angiography?
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate whether contrast dose based on lean body weight (LBW) protocol has the potential to reduce contrast volume in patients with high basal metabolic index (BMI) compared to total body weight (TBW)-based protocols. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Institutional Review B...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific Scholar
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34345528 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_97_2021 |
_version_ | 1783731697123065856 |
---|---|
author | Chandrasekharan, Rajsekar Kulkarni, Chinmay Bhimaji Pullara, Sreekumar Karumathil Moorthy, Srikanth |
author_facet | Chandrasekharan, Rajsekar Kulkarni, Chinmay Bhimaji Pullara, Sreekumar Karumathil Moorthy, Srikanth |
author_sort | Chandrasekharan, Rajsekar |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate whether contrast dose based on lean body weight (LBW) protocol has the potential to reduce contrast volume in patients with high basal metabolic index (BMI) compared to total body weight (TBW)-based protocols. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this prospective study. Initially, a pilot study with a sample size of 150 patients was conducted to estimate the average fat fraction in our population. Then, CT angiography (CTA) for the thoracic and abdominal aorta was performed using a 256-multidetector computed tomography scanner in 117 patients who were undergoing screening for aortic aneurysm and vascular assessment of prospective transplant donors. The patients were divided into two groups: A TBW group (n = 60) and LBW group (n = 57). Lean body weight (LBW) was estimated from the patient weight, height, and gender using Hume’s equation. The TBW group received 1.2 ml/kg contrast dose and the LBW group received 1.6 ml/kg contrast dose to achieve approximately equal iodine dose in both groups. Differences in the degree of aortic enhancement between the estimated LBW and TBW group were evaluated. In higher BMI patients (>25), the mean aortic enhancement (MAEnh) and the contrast volume delivered between the LBW and TBW group were compared. RESULTS: Mean aortic enhancement (MAEnh) 422.45 (±74.5) Hounsfield unit (HU) in the TBW group and 432.67 (±69.4) HU in the LBW group showed no statistical difference (P = 0.439). In population with BMI >25, the contrast delivered in LBW protocol patients was significantly less (P = 0.00) compared to TBW protocol patients, with no significant difference in the MAEnh between the groups (P = 0.479). CONCLUSION: CTA using a LBW protocol helps to significantly reduce the volume of contrast delivered, especially in patients with BMI >25 compared to TBW protocol, without compromising the aortic enhancement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8326097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Scientific Scholar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83260972021-08-02 Does Contrast Dose Based in Lean body Weight Allow Lesser Volumes on High BMI Patients for CT Angiography? Chandrasekharan, Rajsekar Kulkarni, Chinmay Bhimaji Pullara, Sreekumar Karumathil Moorthy, Srikanth J Clin Imaging Sci Original Research OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate whether contrast dose based on lean body weight (LBW) protocol has the potential to reduce contrast volume in patients with high basal metabolic index (BMI) compared to total body weight (TBW)-based protocols. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this prospective study. Initially, a pilot study with a sample size of 150 patients was conducted to estimate the average fat fraction in our population. Then, CT angiography (CTA) for the thoracic and abdominal aorta was performed using a 256-multidetector computed tomography scanner in 117 patients who were undergoing screening for aortic aneurysm and vascular assessment of prospective transplant donors. The patients were divided into two groups: A TBW group (n = 60) and LBW group (n = 57). Lean body weight (LBW) was estimated from the patient weight, height, and gender using Hume’s equation. The TBW group received 1.2 ml/kg contrast dose and the LBW group received 1.6 ml/kg contrast dose to achieve approximately equal iodine dose in both groups. Differences in the degree of aortic enhancement between the estimated LBW and TBW group were evaluated. In higher BMI patients (>25), the mean aortic enhancement (MAEnh) and the contrast volume delivered between the LBW and TBW group were compared. RESULTS: Mean aortic enhancement (MAEnh) 422.45 (±74.5) Hounsfield unit (HU) in the TBW group and 432.67 (±69.4) HU in the LBW group showed no statistical difference (P = 0.439). In population with BMI >25, the contrast delivered in LBW protocol patients was significantly less (P = 0.00) compared to TBW protocol patients, with no significant difference in the MAEnh between the groups (P = 0.479). CONCLUSION: CTA using a LBW protocol helps to significantly reduce the volume of contrast delivered, especially in patients with BMI >25 compared to TBW protocol, without compromising the aortic enhancement. Scientific Scholar 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8326097/ /pubmed/34345528 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_97_2021 Text en © 2021 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Chandrasekharan, Rajsekar Kulkarni, Chinmay Bhimaji Pullara, Sreekumar Karumathil Moorthy, Srikanth Does Contrast Dose Based in Lean body Weight Allow Lesser Volumes on High BMI Patients for CT Angiography? |
title | Does Contrast Dose Based in Lean body Weight Allow Lesser Volumes on High BMI Patients for CT Angiography? |
title_full | Does Contrast Dose Based in Lean body Weight Allow Lesser Volumes on High BMI Patients for CT Angiography? |
title_fullStr | Does Contrast Dose Based in Lean body Weight Allow Lesser Volumes on High BMI Patients for CT Angiography? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Contrast Dose Based in Lean body Weight Allow Lesser Volumes on High BMI Patients for CT Angiography? |
title_short | Does Contrast Dose Based in Lean body Weight Allow Lesser Volumes on High BMI Patients for CT Angiography? |
title_sort | does contrast dose based in lean body weight allow lesser volumes on high bmi patients for ct angiography? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34345528 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_97_2021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chandrasekharanrajsekar doescontrastdosebasedinleanbodyweightallowlesservolumesonhighbmipatientsforctangiography AT kulkarnichinmaybhimaji doescontrastdosebasedinleanbodyweightallowlesservolumesonhighbmipatientsforctangiography AT pullarasreekumarkarumathil doescontrastdosebasedinleanbodyweightallowlesservolumesonhighbmipatientsforctangiography AT moorthysrikanth doescontrastdosebasedinleanbodyweightallowlesservolumesonhighbmipatientsforctangiography |