Cargando…

Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now?

Most important international guidelines recommend the use of CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for stroke and bleeding risk assessments in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, respectively. The 2020 AF guidelines of European Society of Cardiology have revised the definition of “C: congestive heart...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuo, Ling, Chan, Yi-Hsin, Liao, Jo-Nan, Chen, Shih-Ann, Chao, Tze-Fan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Cardiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34227269
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0170
_version_ 1783731735856414720
author Kuo, Ling
Chan, Yi-Hsin
Liao, Jo-Nan
Chen, Shih-Ann
Chao, Tze-Fan
author_facet Kuo, Ling
Chan, Yi-Hsin
Liao, Jo-Nan
Chen, Shih-Ann
Chao, Tze-Fan
author_sort Kuo, Ling
collection PubMed
description Most important international guidelines recommend the use of CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for stroke and bleeding risk assessments in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, respectively. The 2020 AF guidelines of European Society of Cardiology have revised the definition of “C: congestive heart failure (HF)” component, and now patients with either HF with reduced ejection fraction or preserved ejection fraction should be assigned 1 point. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was also included. Besides, the revised “V: vascular diseases” component included both prior myocardial infarction and “angiographically significant coronary artery disease”. It is important to understand that the stroke and bleeding risks of AF patients were not static and should be re-assessed regularly. A high HAS-BLED score itself should not be the only reason to withhold or discontinue oral anticoagulants, but remind physicians for the corrections of modifiable bleeding risk factors and more regular follow up. In the future, the AF duration and left atrial function may play an important role for personalized evaluation of individual stroke risk while more studies are necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8326217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Society of Cardiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83262172021-08-02 Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now? Kuo, Ling Chan, Yi-Hsin Liao, Jo-Nan Chen, Shih-Ann Chao, Tze-Fan Korean Circ J State of the Art Review Most important international guidelines recommend the use of CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for stroke and bleeding risk assessments in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, respectively. The 2020 AF guidelines of European Society of Cardiology have revised the definition of “C: congestive heart failure (HF)” component, and now patients with either HF with reduced ejection fraction or preserved ejection fraction should be assigned 1 point. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was also included. Besides, the revised “V: vascular diseases” component included both prior myocardial infarction and “angiographically significant coronary artery disease”. It is important to understand that the stroke and bleeding risks of AF patients were not static and should be re-assessed regularly. A high HAS-BLED score itself should not be the only reason to withhold or discontinue oral anticoagulants, but remind physicians for the corrections of modifiable bleeding risk factors and more regular follow up. In the future, the AF duration and left atrial function may play an important role for personalized evaluation of individual stroke risk while more studies are necessary. The Korean Society of Cardiology 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8326217/ /pubmed/34227269 http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0170 Text en Copyright © 2021. The Korean Society of Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle State of the Art Review
Kuo, Ling
Chan, Yi-Hsin
Liao, Jo-Nan
Chen, Shih-Ann
Chao, Tze-Fan
Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now?
title Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now?
title_full Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now?
title_fullStr Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now?
title_full_unstemmed Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now?
title_short Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now?
title_sort stroke and bleeding risk assessment in atrial fibrillation: where are we now?
topic State of the Art Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34227269
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0170
work_keys_str_mv AT kuoling strokeandbleedingriskassessmentinatrialfibrillationwherearewenow
AT chanyihsin strokeandbleedingriskassessmentinatrialfibrillationwherearewenow
AT liaojonan strokeandbleedingriskassessmentinatrialfibrillationwherearewenow
AT chenshihann strokeandbleedingriskassessmentinatrialfibrillationwherearewenow
AT chaotzefan strokeandbleedingriskassessmentinatrialfibrillationwherearewenow