Cargando…
Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now?
Most important international guidelines recommend the use of CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for stroke and bleeding risk assessments in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, respectively. The 2020 AF guidelines of European Society of Cardiology have revised the definition of “C: congestive heart...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Cardiology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34227269 http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0170 |
_version_ | 1783731735856414720 |
---|---|
author | Kuo, Ling Chan, Yi-Hsin Liao, Jo-Nan Chen, Shih-Ann Chao, Tze-Fan |
author_facet | Kuo, Ling Chan, Yi-Hsin Liao, Jo-Nan Chen, Shih-Ann Chao, Tze-Fan |
author_sort | Kuo, Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most important international guidelines recommend the use of CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for stroke and bleeding risk assessments in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, respectively. The 2020 AF guidelines of European Society of Cardiology have revised the definition of “C: congestive heart failure (HF)” component, and now patients with either HF with reduced ejection fraction or preserved ejection fraction should be assigned 1 point. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was also included. Besides, the revised “V: vascular diseases” component included both prior myocardial infarction and “angiographically significant coronary artery disease”. It is important to understand that the stroke and bleeding risks of AF patients were not static and should be re-assessed regularly. A high HAS-BLED score itself should not be the only reason to withhold or discontinue oral anticoagulants, but remind physicians for the corrections of modifiable bleeding risk factors and more regular follow up. In the future, the AF duration and left atrial function may play an important role for personalized evaluation of individual stroke risk while more studies are necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8326217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Cardiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83262172021-08-02 Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now? Kuo, Ling Chan, Yi-Hsin Liao, Jo-Nan Chen, Shih-Ann Chao, Tze-Fan Korean Circ J State of the Art Review Most important international guidelines recommend the use of CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for stroke and bleeding risk assessments in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, respectively. The 2020 AF guidelines of European Society of Cardiology have revised the definition of “C: congestive heart failure (HF)” component, and now patients with either HF with reduced ejection fraction or preserved ejection fraction should be assigned 1 point. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was also included. Besides, the revised “V: vascular diseases” component included both prior myocardial infarction and “angiographically significant coronary artery disease”. It is important to understand that the stroke and bleeding risks of AF patients were not static and should be re-assessed regularly. A high HAS-BLED score itself should not be the only reason to withhold or discontinue oral anticoagulants, but remind physicians for the corrections of modifiable bleeding risk factors and more regular follow up. In the future, the AF duration and left atrial function may play an important role for personalized evaluation of individual stroke risk while more studies are necessary. The Korean Society of Cardiology 2021-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8326217/ /pubmed/34227269 http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0170 Text en Copyright © 2021. The Korean Society of Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | State of the Art Review Kuo, Ling Chan, Yi-Hsin Liao, Jo-Nan Chen, Shih-Ann Chao, Tze-Fan Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now? |
title | Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now? |
title_full | Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now? |
title_fullStr | Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now? |
title_full_unstemmed | Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now? |
title_short | Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now? |
title_sort | stroke and bleeding risk assessment in atrial fibrillation: where are we now? |
topic | State of the Art Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34227269 http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuoling strokeandbleedingriskassessmentinatrialfibrillationwherearewenow AT chanyihsin strokeandbleedingriskassessmentinatrialfibrillationwherearewenow AT liaojonan strokeandbleedingriskassessmentinatrialfibrillationwherearewenow AT chenshihann strokeandbleedingriskassessmentinatrialfibrillationwherearewenow AT chaotzefan strokeandbleedingriskassessmentinatrialfibrillationwherearewenow |