Cargando…

Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema

Background and Purpose: Ischemic brain edema can be measured in computed tomography (CT) using quantitative net water uptake (NWU), a recently established imaging biomarker. NWU determined in follow-up CT after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has shown to be a strong predictor of functional outcome. Ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steffen, Paul, Austein, Friederike, Lindner, Thomas, Meyer, Lukas, Bechstein, Matthias, Rümenapp, Johanna, Klintz, Tristan, Jansen, Olav, Gellißen, Susanne, Hanning, Uta, Fiehler, Jens, Broocks, Gabriel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.668030
_version_ 1783731782353420288
author Steffen, Paul
Austein, Friederike
Lindner, Thomas
Meyer, Lukas
Bechstein, Matthias
Rümenapp, Johanna
Klintz, Tristan
Jansen, Olav
Gellißen, Susanne
Hanning, Uta
Fiehler, Jens
Broocks, Gabriel
author_facet Steffen, Paul
Austein, Friederike
Lindner, Thomas
Meyer, Lukas
Bechstein, Matthias
Rümenapp, Johanna
Klintz, Tristan
Jansen, Olav
Gellißen, Susanne
Hanning, Uta
Fiehler, Jens
Broocks, Gabriel
author_sort Steffen, Paul
collection PubMed
description Background and Purpose: Ischemic brain edema can be measured in computed tomography (CT) using quantitative net water uptake (NWU), a recently established imaging biomarker. NWU determined in follow-up CT after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has shown to be a strong predictor of functional outcome. However, disruption of the blood–brain barrier after MT may also lead to contrast staining, increasing the density on CT scans, and hence, directly impairing measurements of NWU. The purpose of this study was to determine whether dual-energy dual-layer CT (DDCT) after MT can improve the quantification of NWU by measuring NWU in conventional polychromatic CT images (CP-I) and virtual non-contrast images (VNC-I). We hypothesized that VNC-based NWU (vNWU) differs from NWU in conventional CT (cNWU). Methods: Ten patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion who received a DDCT follow-up scan after MT were included. NWU was quantified in conventional and VNC images as previously published and was compared using paired sample t-tests. Results: The mean cNWU was 3.3% (95%CI: 0–0.41%), and vNWU was 11% (95%CI: 1.3–23.4), which was not statistically different (p = 0.09). Two patients showed significant differences between cNWU and vNWU (Δ = 24% and Δ = 36%), while the agreement of cNWU/vNWU in 8/10 patients was high (difference 2.3%, p = 0.23). Conclusion: NWU may be quantified precisely on conventional CT images, as the underestimation of ischemic edema due to contrast staining was low. However, a proportion of patients after MT might show significant contrast leakage resulting in edema underestimation. Further research is needed to validate these findings and investigate clinical implications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8326321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83263212021-08-03 Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema Steffen, Paul Austein, Friederike Lindner, Thomas Meyer, Lukas Bechstein, Matthias Rümenapp, Johanna Klintz, Tristan Jansen, Olav Gellißen, Susanne Hanning, Uta Fiehler, Jens Broocks, Gabriel Front Neurol Neurology Background and Purpose: Ischemic brain edema can be measured in computed tomography (CT) using quantitative net water uptake (NWU), a recently established imaging biomarker. NWU determined in follow-up CT after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has shown to be a strong predictor of functional outcome. However, disruption of the blood–brain barrier after MT may also lead to contrast staining, increasing the density on CT scans, and hence, directly impairing measurements of NWU. The purpose of this study was to determine whether dual-energy dual-layer CT (DDCT) after MT can improve the quantification of NWU by measuring NWU in conventional polychromatic CT images (CP-I) and virtual non-contrast images (VNC-I). We hypothesized that VNC-based NWU (vNWU) differs from NWU in conventional CT (cNWU). Methods: Ten patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion who received a DDCT follow-up scan after MT were included. NWU was quantified in conventional and VNC images as previously published and was compared using paired sample t-tests. Results: The mean cNWU was 3.3% (95%CI: 0–0.41%), and vNWU was 11% (95%CI: 1.3–23.4), which was not statistically different (p = 0.09). Two patients showed significant differences between cNWU and vNWU (Δ = 24% and Δ = 36%), while the agreement of cNWU/vNWU in 8/10 patients was high (difference 2.3%, p = 0.23). Conclusion: NWU may be quantified precisely on conventional CT images, as the underestimation of ischemic edema due to contrast staining was low. However, a proportion of patients after MT might show significant contrast leakage resulting in edema underestimation. Further research is needed to validate these findings and investigate clinical implications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8326321/ /pubmed/34349718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.668030 Text en Copyright © 2021 Steffen, Austein, Lindner, Meyer, Bechstein, Rümenapp, Klintz, Jansen, Gellißen, Hanning, Fiehler and Broocks. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Steffen, Paul
Austein, Friederike
Lindner, Thomas
Meyer, Lukas
Bechstein, Matthias
Rümenapp, Johanna
Klintz, Tristan
Jansen, Olav
Gellißen, Susanne
Hanning, Uta
Fiehler, Jens
Broocks, Gabriel
Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema
title Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema
title_full Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema
title_fullStr Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema
title_full_unstemmed Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema
title_short Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema
title_sort value of dual-energy dual-layer ct after mechanical recanalization for the quantification of ischemic brain edema
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.668030
work_keys_str_mv AT steffenpaul valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema
AT austeinfriederike valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema
AT lindnerthomas valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema
AT meyerlukas valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema
AT bechsteinmatthias valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema
AT rumenappjohanna valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema
AT klintztristan valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema
AT jansenolav valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema
AT gellißensusanne valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema
AT hanninguta valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema
AT fiehlerjens valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema
AT broocksgabriel valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema