Cargando…
Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema
Background and Purpose: Ischemic brain edema can be measured in computed tomography (CT) using quantitative net water uptake (NWU), a recently established imaging biomarker. NWU determined in follow-up CT after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has shown to be a strong predictor of functional outcome. Ho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.668030 |
_version_ | 1783731782353420288 |
---|---|
author | Steffen, Paul Austein, Friederike Lindner, Thomas Meyer, Lukas Bechstein, Matthias Rümenapp, Johanna Klintz, Tristan Jansen, Olav Gellißen, Susanne Hanning, Uta Fiehler, Jens Broocks, Gabriel |
author_facet | Steffen, Paul Austein, Friederike Lindner, Thomas Meyer, Lukas Bechstein, Matthias Rümenapp, Johanna Klintz, Tristan Jansen, Olav Gellißen, Susanne Hanning, Uta Fiehler, Jens Broocks, Gabriel |
author_sort | Steffen, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Purpose: Ischemic brain edema can be measured in computed tomography (CT) using quantitative net water uptake (NWU), a recently established imaging biomarker. NWU determined in follow-up CT after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has shown to be a strong predictor of functional outcome. However, disruption of the blood–brain barrier after MT may also lead to contrast staining, increasing the density on CT scans, and hence, directly impairing measurements of NWU. The purpose of this study was to determine whether dual-energy dual-layer CT (DDCT) after MT can improve the quantification of NWU by measuring NWU in conventional polychromatic CT images (CP-I) and virtual non-contrast images (VNC-I). We hypothesized that VNC-based NWU (vNWU) differs from NWU in conventional CT (cNWU). Methods: Ten patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion who received a DDCT follow-up scan after MT were included. NWU was quantified in conventional and VNC images as previously published and was compared using paired sample t-tests. Results: The mean cNWU was 3.3% (95%CI: 0–0.41%), and vNWU was 11% (95%CI: 1.3–23.4), which was not statistically different (p = 0.09). Two patients showed significant differences between cNWU and vNWU (Δ = 24% and Δ = 36%), while the agreement of cNWU/vNWU in 8/10 patients was high (difference 2.3%, p = 0.23). Conclusion: NWU may be quantified precisely on conventional CT images, as the underestimation of ischemic edema due to contrast staining was low. However, a proportion of patients after MT might show significant contrast leakage resulting in edema underestimation. Further research is needed to validate these findings and investigate clinical implications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8326321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83263212021-08-03 Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema Steffen, Paul Austein, Friederike Lindner, Thomas Meyer, Lukas Bechstein, Matthias Rümenapp, Johanna Klintz, Tristan Jansen, Olav Gellißen, Susanne Hanning, Uta Fiehler, Jens Broocks, Gabriel Front Neurol Neurology Background and Purpose: Ischemic brain edema can be measured in computed tomography (CT) using quantitative net water uptake (NWU), a recently established imaging biomarker. NWU determined in follow-up CT after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has shown to be a strong predictor of functional outcome. However, disruption of the blood–brain barrier after MT may also lead to contrast staining, increasing the density on CT scans, and hence, directly impairing measurements of NWU. The purpose of this study was to determine whether dual-energy dual-layer CT (DDCT) after MT can improve the quantification of NWU by measuring NWU in conventional polychromatic CT images (CP-I) and virtual non-contrast images (VNC-I). We hypothesized that VNC-based NWU (vNWU) differs from NWU in conventional CT (cNWU). Methods: Ten patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion who received a DDCT follow-up scan after MT were included. NWU was quantified in conventional and VNC images as previously published and was compared using paired sample t-tests. Results: The mean cNWU was 3.3% (95%CI: 0–0.41%), and vNWU was 11% (95%CI: 1.3–23.4), which was not statistically different (p = 0.09). Two patients showed significant differences between cNWU and vNWU (Δ = 24% and Δ = 36%), while the agreement of cNWU/vNWU in 8/10 patients was high (difference 2.3%, p = 0.23). Conclusion: NWU may be quantified precisely on conventional CT images, as the underestimation of ischemic edema due to contrast staining was low. However, a proportion of patients after MT might show significant contrast leakage resulting in edema underestimation. Further research is needed to validate these findings and investigate clinical implications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8326321/ /pubmed/34349718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.668030 Text en Copyright © 2021 Steffen, Austein, Lindner, Meyer, Bechstein, Rümenapp, Klintz, Jansen, Gellißen, Hanning, Fiehler and Broocks. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Steffen, Paul Austein, Friederike Lindner, Thomas Meyer, Lukas Bechstein, Matthias Rümenapp, Johanna Klintz, Tristan Jansen, Olav Gellißen, Susanne Hanning, Uta Fiehler, Jens Broocks, Gabriel Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema |
title | Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema |
title_full | Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema |
title_fullStr | Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema |
title_full_unstemmed | Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema |
title_short | Value of Dual-Energy Dual-Layer CT After Mechanical Recanalization for the Quantification of Ischemic Brain Edema |
title_sort | value of dual-energy dual-layer ct after mechanical recanalization for the quantification of ischemic brain edema |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.668030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steffenpaul valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema AT austeinfriederike valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema AT lindnerthomas valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema AT meyerlukas valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema AT bechsteinmatthias valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema AT rumenappjohanna valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema AT klintztristan valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema AT jansenolav valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema AT gellißensusanne valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema AT hanninguta valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema AT fiehlerjens valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema AT broocksgabriel valueofdualenergyduallayerctaftermechanicalrecanalizationforthequantificationofischemicbrainedema |