Cargando…
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Tedizolid Phosphate and Linezolid for Treatment of Ventilated Gram-Positive Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia
BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) are associated with high mortality rates. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tedizolid (administered as tedizolid phosphate) for treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33720350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab032 |
_version_ | 1783731849210626048 |
---|---|
author | Wunderink, Richard G Roquilly, Antoine Croce, Martin Rodriguez Gonzalez, Daniel Fujimi, Satoshi Butterton, Joan R Broyde, Natasha Popejoy, Myra W Kim, Jason Y De Anda, Carisa |
author_facet | Wunderink, Richard G Roquilly, Antoine Croce, Martin Rodriguez Gonzalez, Daniel Fujimi, Satoshi Butterton, Joan R Broyde, Natasha Popejoy, Myra W Kim, Jason Y De Anda, Carisa |
author_sort | Wunderink, Richard G |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) are associated with high mortality rates. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tedizolid (administered as tedizolid phosphate) for treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. METHODS: In this randomized, noninferiority, double-blind, double-dummy, global phase 3 trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily for 7 days or intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours for 10 days. Treatment was 14 days in patients with concurrent gram-positive bacteremia. The primary efficacy end points were day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM; noninferiority margin, 10%) and investigator-assessed clinical response at test of cure (TOC; noninferiority margin, 12.5%) in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Overall, 726 patients were randomized (tedizolid, n = 366; linezolid, n = 360). Baseline characteristics, including incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (31.3% overall), were well balanced. Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM rate: 28.1% and 26.4%, respectively (difference, –1.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –8.2 to 4.7). Noninferiority of tedizolid was not demonstrated for investigator-assessed clinical cure at TOC (tedizolid, 56.3% vs linezolid, 63.9%; difference, –7.6%; 97.5% CI: –15.7 to 0.5). In post hoc analyses, no single factor accounted for the difference in clinical response between treatment groups. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 8.1% and 11.9% of patients who received tedizolid and linezolid, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM in the treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. Noninferiority of tedizolid for investigator-assessed clinical response at TOC was not demonstrated. Both drugs were well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02019420. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8326538 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83265382021-08-02 A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Tedizolid Phosphate and Linezolid for Treatment of Ventilated Gram-Positive Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia Wunderink, Richard G Roquilly, Antoine Croce, Martin Rodriguez Gonzalez, Daniel Fujimi, Satoshi Butterton, Joan R Broyde, Natasha Popejoy, Myra W Kim, Jason Y De Anda, Carisa Clin Infect Dis Online Only Articles BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) are associated with high mortality rates. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tedizolid (administered as tedizolid phosphate) for treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. METHODS: In this randomized, noninferiority, double-blind, double-dummy, global phase 3 trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily for 7 days or intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours for 10 days. Treatment was 14 days in patients with concurrent gram-positive bacteremia. The primary efficacy end points were day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM; noninferiority margin, 10%) and investigator-assessed clinical response at test of cure (TOC; noninferiority margin, 12.5%) in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Overall, 726 patients were randomized (tedizolid, n = 366; linezolid, n = 360). Baseline characteristics, including incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (31.3% overall), were well balanced. Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM rate: 28.1% and 26.4%, respectively (difference, –1.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –8.2 to 4.7). Noninferiority of tedizolid was not demonstrated for investigator-assessed clinical cure at TOC (tedizolid, 56.3% vs linezolid, 63.9%; difference, –7.6%; 97.5% CI: –15.7 to 0.5). In post hoc analyses, no single factor accounted for the difference in clinical response between treatment groups. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 8.1% and 11.9% of patients who received tedizolid and linezolid, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM in the treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. Noninferiority of tedizolid for investigator-assessed clinical response at TOC was not demonstrated. Both drugs were well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02019420. Oxford University Press 2021-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8326538/ /pubmed/33720350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab032 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Online Only Articles Wunderink, Richard G Roquilly, Antoine Croce, Martin Rodriguez Gonzalez, Daniel Fujimi, Satoshi Butterton, Joan R Broyde, Natasha Popejoy, Myra W Kim, Jason Y De Anda, Carisa A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Tedizolid Phosphate and Linezolid for Treatment of Ventilated Gram-Positive Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia |
title | A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Tedizolid Phosphate and Linezolid for Treatment of Ventilated Gram-Positive Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia |
title_full | A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Tedizolid Phosphate and Linezolid for Treatment of Ventilated Gram-Positive Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia |
title_fullStr | A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Tedizolid Phosphate and Linezolid for Treatment of Ventilated Gram-Positive Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia |
title_full_unstemmed | A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Tedizolid Phosphate and Linezolid for Treatment of Ventilated Gram-Positive Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia |
title_short | A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Tedizolid Phosphate and Linezolid for Treatment of Ventilated Gram-Positive Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia |
title_sort | phase 3, randomized, double-blind study comparing tedizolid phosphate and linezolid for treatment of ventilated gram-positive hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia |
topic | Online Only Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33720350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wunderinkrichardg aphase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT roquillyantoine aphase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT crocemartin aphase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT rodriguezgonzalezdaniel aphase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT fujimisatoshi aphase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT buttertonjoanr aphase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT broydenatasha aphase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT popejoymyraw aphase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT kimjasony aphase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT deandacarisa aphase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT wunderinkrichardg phase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT roquillyantoine phase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT crocemartin phase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT rodriguezgonzalezdaniel phase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT fujimisatoshi phase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT buttertonjoanr phase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT broydenatasha phase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT popejoymyraw phase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT kimjasony phase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia AT deandacarisa phase3randomizeddoubleblindstudycomparingtedizolidphosphateandlinezolidfortreatmentofventilatedgrampositivehospitalacquiredorventilatorassociatedbacterialpneumonia |