Cargando…
Portuguese Version of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale: Validation in a Population of Chronic Pain Patients
Objective: Despite the effectiveness of pain medicines, nonadherence to prescribed medication remains a major problem faced by healthcare systems. The aim of present study was to perform the translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale (INAS) for the Europe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.681378 |
_version_ | 1783731851190337536 |
---|---|
author | Sampaio, Rute Cruz, Mariana Pinho, Simão Dias, Cláudia Camila Weinman, John Castro Lopes, José M. |
author_facet | Sampaio, Rute Cruz, Mariana Pinho, Simão Dias, Cláudia Camila Weinman, John Castro Lopes, José M. |
author_sort | Sampaio, Rute |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Despite the effectiveness of pain medicines, nonadherence to prescribed medication remains a major problem faced by healthcare systems. The aim of present study was to perform the translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale (INAS) for the European Portuguese language in a sample of chronic pain patients. Methods: A Portuguese version of the INAS scale was constructed through a process of translation, back translation, and expert’s panel evaluation. A total of 133 chronic pain patients were selected from two chronic pain clinics from tertiary hospitals in Porto, Portugal. The protocol interview included the assessment of pain beliefs (PBPI), beliefs about medicine (BMQ), medication adherence (MARS-P9), and two direct questions about adherence previously validated. Results: The internal consistency in all subscales was α = 0.902 for testing treatment; α = 0.930 for mistrust treatment; α = 0.917 for resisting treatment; and α = 0.889 for resisting illness. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure that explained 74% of the variance. The construct validity of the INAS was shown to be adequate, with the majority of the previously defined hypotheses regarding intercorrelations with other measures confirmed. Conclusion: The Portuguese version of INAS could be a valuable and available instrument for Portuguese researchers and clinicians to assess the intentional nonadherence determinants during the management of chronic pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8326559 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83265592021-08-03 Portuguese Version of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale: Validation in a Population of Chronic Pain Patients Sampaio, Rute Cruz, Mariana Pinho, Simão Dias, Cláudia Camila Weinman, John Castro Lopes, José M. Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Objective: Despite the effectiveness of pain medicines, nonadherence to prescribed medication remains a major problem faced by healthcare systems. The aim of present study was to perform the translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale (INAS) for the European Portuguese language in a sample of chronic pain patients. Methods: A Portuguese version of the INAS scale was constructed through a process of translation, back translation, and expert’s panel evaluation. A total of 133 chronic pain patients were selected from two chronic pain clinics from tertiary hospitals in Porto, Portugal. The protocol interview included the assessment of pain beliefs (PBPI), beliefs about medicine (BMQ), medication adherence (MARS-P9), and two direct questions about adherence previously validated. Results: The internal consistency in all subscales was α = 0.902 for testing treatment; α = 0.930 for mistrust treatment; α = 0.917 for resisting treatment; and α = 0.889 for resisting illness. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure that explained 74% of the variance. The construct validity of the INAS was shown to be adequate, with the majority of the previously defined hypotheses regarding intercorrelations with other measures confirmed. Conclusion: The Portuguese version of INAS could be a valuable and available instrument for Portuguese researchers and clinicians to assess the intentional nonadherence determinants during the management of chronic pain. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8326559/ /pubmed/34349646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.681378 Text en Copyright © 2021 Sampaio, Cruz, Pinho, Dias, Weinman and Castro Lopes. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Sampaio, Rute Cruz, Mariana Pinho, Simão Dias, Cláudia Camila Weinman, John Castro Lopes, José M. Portuguese Version of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale: Validation in a Population of Chronic Pain Patients |
title | Portuguese Version of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale: Validation in a Population of Chronic Pain Patients |
title_full | Portuguese Version of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale: Validation in a Population of Chronic Pain Patients |
title_fullStr | Portuguese Version of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale: Validation in a Population of Chronic Pain Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Portuguese Version of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale: Validation in a Population of Chronic Pain Patients |
title_short | Portuguese Version of the Intentional Non-Adherence Scale: Validation in a Population of Chronic Pain Patients |
title_sort | portuguese version of the intentional non-adherence scale: validation in a population of chronic pain patients |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326559/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.681378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sampaiorute portugueseversionoftheintentionalnonadherencescalevalidationinapopulationofchronicpainpatients AT cruzmariana portugueseversionoftheintentionalnonadherencescalevalidationinapopulationofchronicpainpatients AT pinhosimao portugueseversionoftheintentionalnonadherencescalevalidationinapopulationofchronicpainpatients AT diasclaudiacamila portugueseversionoftheintentionalnonadherencescalevalidationinapopulationofchronicpainpatients AT weinmanjohn portugueseversionoftheintentionalnonadherencescalevalidationinapopulationofchronicpainpatients AT castrolopesjosem portugueseversionoftheintentionalnonadherencescalevalidationinapopulationofchronicpainpatients |