Cargando…
Fundamental Outcome Measurement: Selecting Patient Reported Outcome Instruments and Interpreting the Data they Produce
Over the past 40 years literally thousands of generic and disease specific patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments have been developed. While most were developed for a specific study and were never used again, there is still the question of how manufacturers and others should select a PRO instrum...
Autores principales: | McKenna, Stephen P, Heaney, Alice, Langley, Paul C |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34345514 http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v12i2.3911 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Fundamental Measurement: The Need Fulfilment Quality of Life (N-QOL) Measure
por: Langley, Paul C, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Value Assessment in Cystic Fibrosis: ICER’s Rejection of the Axioms of Fundamental Measurement
por: Langley, Paul C
Publicado: (2020) -
Value Assessment, Real World Evidence and Fundamental Measurement: Version 3.0 of the Minnesota Formulary Submission Guidelines
por: Langley, Paul C
Publicado: (2020) -
Interpreting scores on multiple sclerosis-specific patient reported outcome measures (the PRIMUS and U-FIS)
por: Twiss, James, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
To Dream the Impossible Dream: The Commitment by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review to Rewrite the Axioms of Fundamental Measurement for Hemophilia A and Bladder Cancer Value Claims
por: Langley, Paul C
Publicado: (2020)