Cargando…
Opposite impact of emission reduction during the COVID-19 lockdown period on the surface concentrations of PM(2.5) and O(3) in Wuhan, China()
To prevent the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic, the Chinese megacity Wuhan has taken emergent lockdown measures starting on January 23, 2020. This provided a natural experiment to investigate the response of air quality to such emission reductions. Here, we decoupled the influence of meteorological...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34358865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117899 |
_version_ | 1783731907486285824 |
---|---|
author | Yin, Hao Liu, Cheng Hu, Qihou Liu, Ting Wang, Shuntian Gao, Meng Xu, Shiqi Zhang, Chengxin Su, Wenjing |
author_facet | Yin, Hao Liu, Cheng Hu, Qihou Liu, Ting Wang, Shuntian Gao, Meng Xu, Shiqi Zhang, Chengxin Su, Wenjing |
author_sort | Yin, Hao |
collection | PubMed |
description | To prevent the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic, the Chinese megacity Wuhan has taken emergent lockdown measures starting on January 23, 2020. This provided a natural experiment to investigate the response of air quality to such emission reductions. Here, we decoupled the influence of meteorological and non-meteorological factors on main air pollutants using generalized additive models (GAMs), driven by data from the China National Environmental Monitoring Center (CNEMC) network. During the lockdown period (Jan. 23 – Apr. 8, 2020), PM(2.5), PM(10), NO(2), SO(2), and CO concentrations decreased significantly by 45 %, 49 %, 56 %, 39 %, and 18 % compared with the corresponding period in 2015–2019, with contributions by S(meteos) of 15 %, 17 %, 13 %, 10 %, and 6 %. This indicates an emission reduction of NO(x) at least 43 %. However, O(3) increased by 43 % with a contribution by S(meteos) of 6 %. In spite of the reduced volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions by 30 % during the strict lockdown period (Jan. 23 – Feb. 14, 2020), which likely reduced the production of O(3), O(3) concentrations increased due to a weakening of the titration effect of NO. Our results suggest that conventional emission reduction (NO(x) reduction only) measures may not be sufficient to reduce (or even lead to an increase of) surface O(3) concentrations, even if reaching the limit, and VOC-specific measures should also be taken. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8326756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83267562021-08-02 Opposite impact of emission reduction during the COVID-19 lockdown period on the surface concentrations of PM(2.5) and O(3) in Wuhan, China() Yin, Hao Liu, Cheng Hu, Qihou Liu, Ting Wang, Shuntian Gao, Meng Xu, Shiqi Zhang, Chengxin Su, Wenjing Environ Pollut Article To prevent the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic, the Chinese megacity Wuhan has taken emergent lockdown measures starting on January 23, 2020. This provided a natural experiment to investigate the response of air quality to such emission reductions. Here, we decoupled the influence of meteorological and non-meteorological factors on main air pollutants using generalized additive models (GAMs), driven by data from the China National Environmental Monitoring Center (CNEMC) network. During the lockdown period (Jan. 23 – Apr. 8, 2020), PM(2.5), PM(10), NO(2), SO(2), and CO concentrations decreased significantly by 45 %, 49 %, 56 %, 39 %, and 18 % compared with the corresponding period in 2015–2019, with contributions by S(meteos) of 15 %, 17 %, 13 %, 10 %, and 6 %. This indicates an emission reduction of NO(x) at least 43 %. However, O(3) increased by 43 % with a contribution by S(meteos) of 6 %. In spite of the reduced volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions by 30 % during the strict lockdown period (Jan. 23 – Feb. 14, 2020), which likely reduced the production of O(3), O(3) concentrations increased due to a weakening of the titration effect of NO. Our results suggest that conventional emission reduction (NO(x) reduction only) measures may not be sufficient to reduce (or even lead to an increase of) surface O(3) concentrations, even if reaching the limit, and VOC-specific measures should also be taken. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-11-15 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8326756/ /pubmed/34358865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117899 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Yin, Hao Liu, Cheng Hu, Qihou Liu, Ting Wang, Shuntian Gao, Meng Xu, Shiqi Zhang, Chengxin Su, Wenjing Opposite impact of emission reduction during the COVID-19 lockdown period on the surface concentrations of PM(2.5) and O(3) in Wuhan, China() |
title | Opposite impact of emission reduction during the COVID-19 lockdown period on the surface concentrations of PM(2.5) and O(3) in Wuhan, China() |
title_full | Opposite impact of emission reduction during the COVID-19 lockdown period on the surface concentrations of PM(2.5) and O(3) in Wuhan, China() |
title_fullStr | Opposite impact of emission reduction during the COVID-19 lockdown period on the surface concentrations of PM(2.5) and O(3) in Wuhan, China() |
title_full_unstemmed | Opposite impact of emission reduction during the COVID-19 lockdown period on the surface concentrations of PM(2.5) and O(3) in Wuhan, China() |
title_short | Opposite impact of emission reduction during the COVID-19 lockdown period on the surface concentrations of PM(2.5) and O(3) in Wuhan, China() |
title_sort | opposite impact of emission reduction during the covid-19 lockdown period on the surface concentrations of pm(2.5) and o(3) in wuhan, china() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34358865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117899 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yinhao oppositeimpactofemissionreductionduringthecovid19lockdownperiodonthesurfaceconcentrationsofpm25ando3inwuhanchina AT liucheng oppositeimpactofemissionreductionduringthecovid19lockdownperiodonthesurfaceconcentrationsofpm25ando3inwuhanchina AT huqihou oppositeimpactofemissionreductionduringthecovid19lockdownperiodonthesurfaceconcentrationsofpm25ando3inwuhanchina AT liuting oppositeimpactofemissionreductionduringthecovid19lockdownperiodonthesurfaceconcentrationsofpm25ando3inwuhanchina AT wangshuntian oppositeimpactofemissionreductionduringthecovid19lockdownperiodonthesurfaceconcentrationsofpm25ando3inwuhanchina AT gaomeng oppositeimpactofemissionreductionduringthecovid19lockdownperiodonthesurfaceconcentrationsofpm25ando3inwuhanchina AT xushiqi oppositeimpactofemissionreductionduringthecovid19lockdownperiodonthesurfaceconcentrationsofpm25ando3inwuhanchina AT zhangchengxin oppositeimpactofemissionreductionduringthecovid19lockdownperiodonthesurfaceconcentrationsofpm25ando3inwuhanchina AT suwenjing oppositeimpactofemissionreductionduringthecovid19lockdownperiodonthesurfaceconcentrationsofpm25ando3inwuhanchina |