Cargando…

Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Case Series with Mean Follow Up of 9 Years

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report long term comparative clinical outcomes of isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction versus combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) reconstruction in a matched pair analysis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively colle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haidar, Ibrahim, FRADIN, Thomas, Rayes, Johnny, Vieira, Thais, Cédric, Ngbilo, Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand, Saithna, Adnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326998/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00237
_version_ 1783731968682229760
author Haidar, Ibrahim
FRADIN, Thomas
Rayes, Johnny
Vieira, Thais
Cédric, Ngbilo
Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
Saithna, Adnan
author_facet Haidar, Ibrahim
FRADIN, Thomas
Rayes, Johnny
Vieira, Thais
Cédric, Ngbilo
Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
Saithna, Adnan
author_sort Haidar, Ibrahim
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report long term comparative clinical outcomes of isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction versus combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) reconstruction in a matched pair analysis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was undertaken. Patients who underwent combined ACL and ALL reconstruction were matched 1:1 to patients who had undergone isolated ACL reconstruction using a propensity score. Matching was based upon age, BMI, side to side laxity difference, duration of time between injury and surgery, type of sports participation (e.g pivoting, contact), presence of concomitant meniscal injuries and their treatment. At the end of the study period all patients completed Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC and KOOS scores, and underwent telephone interview and medical notes review to determine whether they had experienced any complications or re-operations after the index procedure. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine survivorship with respect to graft rupture rates in each group RESULTS: 90 patients who underwent combined ACL and ALL reconstruction were matched to 90 patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction. The mean duration of follow up was 108.09±9.43 months (range 97-182). The combined ACLR and ALLR group had significant lower graft rupture rate (3.5%) than the isolated ACLR group (16%) (OR=5.306 ; CI =1.46-19.19 ; p=0.007) (Fig 1). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to non-graft rupture related reoperation rates (secondary meniscectomy, cyclops excision, arthroscopic lavage for infection or hemarthrosis). Contralateral ACL rupture rates were comparable between combined ACL and ALL reconstruction (16.27%) and isolated ACL reconstruction (19.5%) groups. The KOOS score was significantly higher in the combined group with respect to subdomains of pain (p=0.007) and quality of life (p=0.007). There was no significant difference in other KOOS domains, Tegner, Lysholm, or IKDC CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the first long-term results of combined ACL and ALL reconstruction. The results demonstrate a significantly lower graft failure rate when compared to isolated ACL reconstruction in a matched pair series with a minimum follow-up of 9 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8326998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83269982021-08-09 Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Case Series with Mean Follow Up of 9 Years Haidar, Ibrahim FRADIN, Thomas Rayes, Johnny Vieira, Thais Cédric, Ngbilo Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand Saithna, Adnan Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report long term comparative clinical outcomes of isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction versus combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) reconstruction in a matched pair analysis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was undertaken. Patients who underwent combined ACL and ALL reconstruction were matched 1:1 to patients who had undergone isolated ACL reconstruction using a propensity score. Matching was based upon age, BMI, side to side laxity difference, duration of time between injury and surgery, type of sports participation (e.g pivoting, contact), presence of concomitant meniscal injuries and their treatment. At the end of the study period all patients completed Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC and KOOS scores, and underwent telephone interview and medical notes review to determine whether they had experienced any complications or re-operations after the index procedure. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine survivorship with respect to graft rupture rates in each group RESULTS: 90 patients who underwent combined ACL and ALL reconstruction were matched to 90 patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction. The mean duration of follow up was 108.09±9.43 months (range 97-182). The combined ACLR and ALLR group had significant lower graft rupture rate (3.5%) than the isolated ACLR group (16%) (OR=5.306 ; CI =1.46-19.19 ; p=0.007) (Fig 1). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to non-graft rupture related reoperation rates (secondary meniscectomy, cyclops excision, arthroscopic lavage for infection or hemarthrosis). Contralateral ACL rupture rates were comparable between combined ACL and ALL reconstruction (16.27%) and isolated ACL reconstruction (19.5%) groups. The KOOS score was significantly higher in the combined group with respect to subdomains of pain (p=0.007) and quality of life (p=0.007). There was no significant difference in other KOOS domains, Tegner, Lysholm, or IKDC CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the first long-term results of combined ACL and ALL reconstruction. The results demonstrate a significantly lower graft failure rate when compared to isolated ACL reconstruction in a matched pair series with a minimum follow-up of 9 years. SAGE Publications 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8326998/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00237 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Haidar, Ibrahim
FRADIN, Thomas
Rayes, Johnny
Vieira, Thais
Cédric, Ngbilo
Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
Saithna, Adnan
Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Case Series with Mean Follow Up of 9 Years
title Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Case Series with Mean Follow Up of 9 Years
title_full Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Case Series with Mean Follow Up of 9 Years
title_fullStr Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Case Series with Mean Follow Up of 9 Years
title_full_unstemmed Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Case Series with Mean Follow Up of 9 Years
title_short Isolated ACL Reconstruction Versus Combined ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Case Series with Mean Follow Up of 9 Years
title_sort isolated acl reconstruction versus combined acl and anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a matched case series with mean follow up of 9 years
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8326998/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00237
work_keys_str_mv AT haidaribrahim isolatedaclreconstructionversuscombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionamatchedcaseserieswithmeanfollowupof9years
AT fradinthomas isolatedaclreconstructionversuscombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionamatchedcaseserieswithmeanfollowupof9years
AT rayesjohnny isolatedaclreconstructionversuscombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionamatchedcaseserieswithmeanfollowupof9years
AT vieirathais isolatedaclreconstructionversuscombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionamatchedcaseserieswithmeanfollowupof9years
AT cedricngbilo isolatedaclreconstructionversuscombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionamatchedcaseserieswithmeanfollowupof9years
AT sonnerycottetbertrand isolatedaclreconstructionversuscombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionamatchedcaseserieswithmeanfollowupof9years
AT saithnaadnan isolatedaclreconstructionversuscombinedaclandanterolateralligamentreconstructionamatchedcaseserieswithmeanfollowupof9years