Cargando…
Quality Assurance for Small-Field VMAT SRS and Conventional-Field IMRT Using the Exradin W1 Scintillator
BACKGROUND: Plastic scintillator detector (PSD) Exradin W1 has shown promising performance in small field dosimetry due to its water equivalence and small sensitive volume. However, few studies reported its capability in measuring fields of conventional sizes. Therefore, the purpose of this study is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8327019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34328800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211036542 |
_version_ | 1783731975389970432 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Zike Qiao, Jian Yang, Cui Liu, Ming Wang, Jiazhou Han, Xu Hu, Weigang |
author_facet | Huang, Zike Qiao, Jian Yang, Cui Liu, Ming Wang, Jiazhou Han, Xu Hu, Weigang |
author_sort | Huang, Zike |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Plastic scintillator detector (PSD) Exradin W1 has shown promising performance in small field dosimetry due to its water equivalence and small sensitive volume. However, few studies reported its capability in measuring fields of conventional sizes. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the performance of W1 in measuring point dose of both conventional IMRT plans and VMAT SRS plans. METHODS: Forty-seven clinical plans (including 29 IMRT plans and 18 VMAT SRS plans with PTV volume less than 8 cm(3)) from our hospital were included in this study. W1 and Farmer-Type ionization chamber Exradin A19 were used in measuring IMRT plans, and W1 and microchamber Exradin A16 were used in measuring SRS plans. The agreement between the results of different types of detectors and TPS was evaluated. RESULTS: For IMRT plans, the average differences between measurements and TPS in high-dose regions were 0.27% ± 1.66% and 0.90% ± 1.78% (P = 0.056), and were −0.76% ± 1.47% and 0.37% ± 1.34% in low-dose regions (P = 0.000), for W1 and A19, respectively. For VMAT SRS plans, the average differences between measurements and TPS were −0.19% ± 0.96% and −0.59% ± 1.49% for W1 and A16 with no statistical difference (P = 0.231). CONCLUSION: W1 showed comparable performance with application-dedicated detectors in point dose measurements for both conventional IMRT and VMAT SRS techniques. It is a potential one-stop solution for general radiotherapy platforms that deliver both IMRT and SRS plans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8327019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83270192021-08-09 Quality Assurance for Small-Field VMAT SRS and Conventional-Field IMRT Using the Exradin W1 Scintillator Huang, Zike Qiao, Jian Yang, Cui Liu, Ming Wang, Jiazhou Han, Xu Hu, Weigang Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article BACKGROUND: Plastic scintillator detector (PSD) Exradin W1 has shown promising performance in small field dosimetry due to its water equivalence and small sensitive volume. However, few studies reported its capability in measuring fields of conventional sizes. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the performance of W1 in measuring point dose of both conventional IMRT plans and VMAT SRS plans. METHODS: Forty-seven clinical plans (including 29 IMRT plans and 18 VMAT SRS plans with PTV volume less than 8 cm(3)) from our hospital were included in this study. W1 and Farmer-Type ionization chamber Exradin A19 were used in measuring IMRT plans, and W1 and microchamber Exradin A16 were used in measuring SRS plans. The agreement between the results of different types of detectors and TPS was evaluated. RESULTS: For IMRT plans, the average differences between measurements and TPS in high-dose regions were 0.27% ± 1.66% and 0.90% ± 1.78% (P = 0.056), and were −0.76% ± 1.47% and 0.37% ± 1.34% in low-dose regions (P = 0.000), for W1 and A19, respectively. For VMAT SRS plans, the average differences between measurements and TPS were −0.19% ± 0.96% and −0.59% ± 1.49% for W1 and A16 with no statistical difference (P = 0.231). CONCLUSION: W1 showed comparable performance with application-dedicated detectors in point dose measurements for both conventional IMRT and VMAT SRS techniques. It is a potential one-stop solution for general radiotherapy platforms that deliver both IMRT and SRS plans. SAGE Publications 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8327019/ /pubmed/34328800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211036542 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Huang, Zike Qiao, Jian Yang, Cui Liu, Ming Wang, Jiazhou Han, Xu Hu, Weigang Quality Assurance for Small-Field VMAT SRS and Conventional-Field IMRT Using the Exradin W1 Scintillator |
title | Quality Assurance for Small-Field VMAT SRS and Conventional-Field
IMRT Using the Exradin W1 Scintillator |
title_full | Quality Assurance for Small-Field VMAT SRS and Conventional-Field
IMRT Using the Exradin W1 Scintillator |
title_fullStr | Quality Assurance for Small-Field VMAT SRS and Conventional-Field
IMRT Using the Exradin W1 Scintillator |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality Assurance for Small-Field VMAT SRS and Conventional-Field
IMRT Using the Exradin W1 Scintillator |
title_short | Quality Assurance for Small-Field VMAT SRS and Conventional-Field
IMRT Using the Exradin W1 Scintillator |
title_sort | quality assurance for small-field vmat srs and conventional-field
imrt using the exradin w1 scintillator |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8327019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34328800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211036542 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangzike qualityassuranceforsmallfieldvmatsrsandconventionalfieldimrtusingtheexradinw1scintillator AT qiaojian qualityassuranceforsmallfieldvmatsrsandconventionalfieldimrtusingtheexradinw1scintillator AT yangcui qualityassuranceforsmallfieldvmatsrsandconventionalfieldimrtusingtheexradinw1scintillator AT liuming qualityassuranceforsmallfieldvmatsrsandconventionalfieldimrtusingtheexradinw1scintillator AT wangjiazhou qualityassuranceforsmallfieldvmatsrsandconventionalfieldimrtusingtheexradinw1scintillator AT hanxu qualityassuranceforsmallfieldvmatsrsandconventionalfieldimrtusingtheexradinw1scintillator AT huweigang qualityassuranceforsmallfieldvmatsrsandconventionalfieldimrtusingtheexradinw1scintillator |