Cargando…
The Severity of Acetabular Retroversion Does Not Influence Outcomes of Arthroscopic Management of FAI
OBJECTIVES: Controversy exists regarding optimal treatment of FAI in the setting of acetabular retroversion. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in pain and function among patients with acetabular retroversion treated with hip arthroscopy. Secondarily, to assess if the severity of p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8327026/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00228 |
_version_ | 1783731977634971648 |
---|---|
author | Day, Molly Seiffert, Kayla An, Qiang Larson, Christopher Westermann, Robert |
author_facet | Day, Molly Seiffert, Kayla An, Qiang Larson, Christopher Westermann, Robert |
author_sort | Day, Molly |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Controversy exists regarding optimal treatment of FAI in the setting of acetabular retroversion. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in pain and function among patients with acetabular retroversion treated with hip arthroscopy. Secondarily, to assess if the severity of posterior wall deficiency influences post-operative outcomes following hip arthroscopy. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with acetabular retroversion with hip arthroscopic surgery at a single institution was performed. Acetabular retroversion was defined by three radiographic criteria: the presence of crossover sign, ischial spine sign, and posterior wall sign. Anteroposterior radiographs were used to measure lateral center edge angle (LCEA), Tonnis grade, anterior wall index (AWI) and posterior wall index (PWI), and alpha angle. Patient-reported outcome (PROs) included modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), visual analog scale (VAS) and quality of life with Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12). Spearman correlation coefficients were used to determine correlation of PWI with pre- and post-PROs. Multivariate analysis was performed and generalized estimating equation was used to determine independent predictors for outcome scores. Significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2019, 138 patients with FAI and acetabular retroversion underwent hip arthroscopy, 67% were female. The average follow-up was 29 months, with minimum of 6 months. Average preoperative LCEA 28, alpha angle 70.1, postoperative alpha angle 44.6 (p<0.05). All PROs demonstrated significant improvement from preoperative baseline to follow-up scores (MHHS (59.5 +/- 14.7 vs 80.8 +/- 18.8), VAS (6.3 +/- 1.7 vs 3.0 +/- 2.7), p<0.0001). Four patients (3%) underwent revision procedures. Upon multivariate analysis, no association between PWI and PROs was not found. Preoperative mHHS was the strongest predictor of clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of patients with acetabular retroversion assessing for a correlation between PWI on patient-reported outcomes following arthroscopic management of FAI. In patients with acetabular retroversion, outcomes are good following arthroscopic management with low complication and revision rate following hip arthroscopy. Posterior wall deficiency was not a predictor of poor outcome in patients with acetabular retroversion. In this single surgeon selected series, the severity of retroversion (measured by PWI) does not appear to have a threshold or any correlation with postoperative outcomes in following FAI treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8327026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83270262021-08-09 The Severity of Acetabular Retroversion Does Not Influence Outcomes of Arthroscopic Management of FAI Day, Molly Seiffert, Kayla An, Qiang Larson, Christopher Westermann, Robert Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Controversy exists regarding optimal treatment of FAI in the setting of acetabular retroversion. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in pain and function among patients with acetabular retroversion treated with hip arthroscopy. Secondarily, to assess if the severity of posterior wall deficiency influences post-operative outcomes following hip arthroscopy. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with acetabular retroversion with hip arthroscopic surgery at a single institution was performed. Acetabular retroversion was defined by three radiographic criteria: the presence of crossover sign, ischial spine sign, and posterior wall sign. Anteroposterior radiographs were used to measure lateral center edge angle (LCEA), Tonnis grade, anterior wall index (AWI) and posterior wall index (PWI), and alpha angle. Patient-reported outcome (PROs) included modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS), visual analog scale (VAS) and quality of life with Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12). Spearman correlation coefficients were used to determine correlation of PWI with pre- and post-PROs. Multivariate analysis was performed and generalized estimating equation was used to determine independent predictors for outcome scores. Significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2019, 138 patients with FAI and acetabular retroversion underwent hip arthroscopy, 67% were female. The average follow-up was 29 months, with minimum of 6 months. Average preoperative LCEA 28, alpha angle 70.1, postoperative alpha angle 44.6 (p<0.05). All PROs demonstrated significant improvement from preoperative baseline to follow-up scores (MHHS (59.5 +/- 14.7 vs 80.8 +/- 18.8), VAS (6.3 +/- 1.7 vs 3.0 +/- 2.7), p<0.0001). Four patients (3%) underwent revision procedures. Upon multivariate analysis, no association between PWI and PROs was not found. Preoperative mHHS was the strongest predictor of clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of patients with acetabular retroversion assessing for a correlation between PWI on patient-reported outcomes following arthroscopic management of FAI. In patients with acetabular retroversion, outcomes are good following arthroscopic management with low complication and revision rate following hip arthroscopy. Posterior wall deficiency was not a predictor of poor outcome in patients with acetabular retroversion. In this single surgeon selected series, the severity of retroversion (measured by PWI) does not appear to have a threshold or any correlation with postoperative outcomes in following FAI treatment. SAGE Publications 2021-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8327026/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00228 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions. |
spellingShingle | Article Day, Molly Seiffert, Kayla An, Qiang Larson, Christopher Westermann, Robert The Severity of Acetabular Retroversion Does Not Influence Outcomes of Arthroscopic Management of FAI |
title | The Severity of Acetabular Retroversion Does Not Influence Outcomes of Arthroscopic Management of FAI |
title_full | The Severity of Acetabular Retroversion Does Not Influence Outcomes of Arthroscopic Management of FAI |
title_fullStr | The Severity of Acetabular Retroversion Does Not Influence Outcomes of Arthroscopic Management of FAI |
title_full_unstemmed | The Severity of Acetabular Retroversion Does Not Influence Outcomes of Arthroscopic Management of FAI |
title_short | The Severity of Acetabular Retroversion Does Not Influence Outcomes of Arthroscopic Management of FAI |
title_sort | severity of acetabular retroversion does not influence outcomes of arthroscopic management of fai |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8327026/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967121S00228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daymolly theseverityofacetabularretroversiondoesnotinfluenceoutcomesofarthroscopicmanagementoffai AT seiffertkayla theseverityofacetabularretroversiondoesnotinfluenceoutcomesofarthroscopicmanagementoffai AT anqiang theseverityofacetabularretroversiondoesnotinfluenceoutcomesofarthroscopicmanagementoffai AT larsonchristopher theseverityofacetabularretroversiondoesnotinfluenceoutcomesofarthroscopicmanagementoffai AT westermannrobert theseverityofacetabularretroversiondoesnotinfluenceoutcomesofarthroscopicmanagementoffai AT daymolly severityofacetabularretroversiondoesnotinfluenceoutcomesofarthroscopicmanagementoffai AT seiffertkayla severityofacetabularretroversiondoesnotinfluenceoutcomesofarthroscopicmanagementoffai AT anqiang severityofacetabularretroversiondoesnotinfluenceoutcomesofarthroscopicmanagementoffai AT larsonchristopher severityofacetabularretroversiondoesnotinfluenceoutcomesofarthroscopicmanagementoffai AT westermannrobert severityofacetabularretroversiondoesnotinfluenceoutcomesofarthroscopicmanagementoffai |