Cargando…

Modularity patterns in mammalian domestication: Assessing developmental hypotheses for diversification

The neural crest hypothesis posits that selection for tameness resulted in mild alterations to neural crest cells during embryonic development, which directly or indirectly caused the appearance of traits associated with the “domestication syndrome” (DS). Although representing an appealing unitary e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Laura A. B., Balcarcel, Ana, Geiger, Madeleine, Heck, Laura, Sánchez‐Villagra, Marcelo R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8327948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.231
_version_ 1783732206788673536
author Wilson, Laura A. B.
Balcarcel, Ana
Geiger, Madeleine
Heck, Laura
Sánchez‐Villagra, Marcelo R.
author_facet Wilson, Laura A. B.
Balcarcel, Ana
Geiger, Madeleine
Heck, Laura
Sánchez‐Villagra, Marcelo R.
author_sort Wilson, Laura A. B.
collection PubMed
description The neural crest hypothesis posits that selection for tameness resulted in mild alterations to neural crest cells during embryonic development, which directly or indirectly caused the appearance of traits associated with the “domestication syndrome” (DS). Although representing an appealing unitary explanation for the generation of domestic phenotypes, support for this hypothesis from morphological data and for the validity of the DS remains a topic of debate. This study used the frameworks of morphological integration and modularity to assess patterns that concern the embryonic origin of the skull and issues around the neural crest hypothesis. Geometric morphometric landmarks were used to quantify cranial trait interactions between six pairs of wild and domestic mammals, comprising representatives that express between five and 17 of the traits included in the DS, and examples from each of the pathways by which animals entered into relationships with humans. We predicted the presence of neural crest vs mesoderm modular structure to the cranium, and that elements in the neural crest module would show lower magnitudes of integration and higher disparity in domestic forms compared to wild forms. Our findings support modular structuring based on tissue origin (neural crest, mesoderm) modules, along with low module integration magnitudes for neural crest cell derived cranial elements, suggesting differential capacity for evolutionary response among those elements. Covariation between the neural crest and mesoderm modules accounted for major components of shape variation for most domestic/wild pairs. Contra to our predictions, however, we find domesticates share similar integration magnitudes to their wild progenitors, indicating that higher disparity in domesticates is not associated with magnitude changes to integration among either neural crest or mesoderm derived elements. Differences in integration magnitude among neural crest and mesoderm elements across species suggest that developmental evolution preserves a framework that promotes flexibility under the selection regimes of domestication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8327948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83279482021-08-06 Modularity patterns in mammalian domestication: Assessing developmental hypotheses for diversification Wilson, Laura A. B. Balcarcel, Ana Geiger, Madeleine Heck, Laura Sánchez‐Villagra, Marcelo R. Evol Lett Letters The neural crest hypothesis posits that selection for tameness resulted in mild alterations to neural crest cells during embryonic development, which directly or indirectly caused the appearance of traits associated with the “domestication syndrome” (DS). Although representing an appealing unitary explanation for the generation of domestic phenotypes, support for this hypothesis from morphological data and for the validity of the DS remains a topic of debate. This study used the frameworks of morphological integration and modularity to assess patterns that concern the embryonic origin of the skull and issues around the neural crest hypothesis. Geometric morphometric landmarks were used to quantify cranial trait interactions between six pairs of wild and domestic mammals, comprising representatives that express between five and 17 of the traits included in the DS, and examples from each of the pathways by which animals entered into relationships with humans. We predicted the presence of neural crest vs mesoderm modular structure to the cranium, and that elements in the neural crest module would show lower magnitudes of integration and higher disparity in domestic forms compared to wild forms. Our findings support modular structuring based on tissue origin (neural crest, mesoderm) modules, along with low module integration magnitudes for neural crest cell derived cranial elements, suggesting differential capacity for evolutionary response among those elements. Covariation between the neural crest and mesoderm modules accounted for major components of shape variation for most domestic/wild pairs. Contra to our predictions, however, we find domesticates share similar integration magnitudes to their wild progenitors, indicating that higher disparity in domesticates is not associated with magnitude changes to integration among either neural crest or mesoderm derived elements. Differences in integration magnitude among neural crest and mesoderm elements across species suggest that developmental evolution preserves a framework that promotes flexibility under the selection regimes of domestication. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8327948/ /pubmed/34367663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.231 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Evolution Letters published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for the Study of Evolution (SSE) and European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letters
Wilson, Laura A. B.
Balcarcel, Ana
Geiger, Madeleine
Heck, Laura
Sánchez‐Villagra, Marcelo R.
Modularity patterns in mammalian domestication: Assessing developmental hypotheses for diversification
title Modularity patterns in mammalian domestication: Assessing developmental hypotheses for diversification
title_full Modularity patterns in mammalian domestication: Assessing developmental hypotheses for diversification
title_fullStr Modularity patterns in mammalian domestication: Assessing developmental hypotheses for diversification
title_full_unstemmed Modularity patterns in mammalian domestication: Assessing developmental hypotheses for diversification
title_short Modularity patterns in mammalian domestication: Assessing developmental hypotheses for diversification
title_sort modularity patterns in mammalian domestication: assessing developmental hypotheses for diversification
topic Letters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8327948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/evl3.231
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonlauraab modularitypatternsinmammaliandomesticationassessingdevelopmentalhypothesesfordiversification
AT balcarcelana modularitypatternsinmammaliandomesticationassessingdevelopmentalhypothesesfordiversification
AT geigermadeleine modularitypatternsinmammaliandomesticationassessingdevelopmentalhypothesesfordiversification
AT hecklaura modularitypatternsinmammaliandomesticationassessingdevelopmentalhypothesesfordiversification
AT sanchezvillagramarcelor modularitypatternsinmammaliandomesticationassessingdevelopmentalhypothesesfordiversification