Cargando…
Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital
Purpose: To analyze the efficacy, safety, and accessibility of netarsudil 0.02% in patients with glaucoma (suspect, open or closed) at a safety-net academic medical center, Boston Medical Center (BMC). Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients prescribed netarsudil 0.02% for uncontrolled glauc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33983847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2020.0112 |
_version_ | 1783732225513095168 |
---|---|
author | Fridman, Gabrielle Sadlak, Natalie Eliassi-Rad, Babak Desai, Manishi A. |
author_facet | Fridman, Gabrielle Sadlak, Natalie Eliassi-Rad, Babak Desai, Manishi A. |
author_sort | Fridman, Gabrielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To analyze the efficacy, safety, and accessibility of netarsudil 0.02% in patients with glaucoma (suspect, open or closed) at a safety-net academic medical center, Boston Medical Center (BMC). Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients prescribed netarsudil 0.02% for uncontrolled glaucoma at BMC between December 2017 and September 2019. Outcome measures included change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline and evaluation of adverse events (AEs). Results: One hundred thirty patients (60% severe stage) were analyzed. The IOP reduction from baseline was about 3 mmHg. Fifty-four patients (42%) experienced an AE (eg, conjunctival hyperemia). Thirty-eight patients (29%) started netarsudil 0.02% in lieu of laser or surgery. Ninety-nine patients (71%) required prior authorization for insurance coverage of netarsudil 0.02%. Ten patients (7%) were unable to obtain netarsudil 0.02% due to issues with insurance coverage. Conclusion: Netarsudil 0.02% yielded significant IOP reduction in our cohort, however, to a smaller degree compared with prior studies that bore equivocal IOP reduction regardless of baseline IOP. Conjunctival hyperemia was the most common AE. In a limited number of patients, netarsudil 0.02% was not covered by insurance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8328041 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83280412021-08-02 Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital Fridman, Gabrielle Sadlak, Natalie Eliassi-Rad, Babak Desai, Manishi A. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Original Articles Purpose: To analyze the efficacy, safety, and accessibility of netarsudil 0.02% in patients with glaucoma (suspect, open or closed) at a safety-net academic medical center, Boston Medical Center (BMC). Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients prescribed netarsudil 0.02% for uncontrolled glaucoma at BMC between December 2017 and September 2019. Outcome measures included change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline and evaluation of adverse events (AEs). Results: One hundred thirty patients (60% severe stage) were analyzed. The IOP reduction from baseline was about 3 mmHg. Fifty-four patients (42%) experienced an AE (eg, conjunctival hyperemia). Thirty-eight patients (29%) started netarsudil 0.02% in lieu of laser or surgery. Ninety-nine patients (71%) required prior authorization for insurance coverage of netarsudil 0.02%. Ten patients (7%) were unable to obtain netarsudil 0.02% due to issues with insurance coverage. Conclusion: Netarsudil 0.02% yielded significant IOP reduction in our cohort, however, to a smaller degree compared with prior studies that bore equivocal IOP reduction regardless of baseline IOP. Conjunctival hyperemia was the most common AE. In a limited number of patients, netarsudil 0.02% was not covered by insurance. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021-08-01 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8328041/ /pubmed/33983847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2020.0112 Text en © Gabrielle Fridman et al. 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License [CC-BY-NC] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Fridman, Gabrielle Sadlak, Natalie Eliassi-Rad, Babak Desai, Manishi A. Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital |
title | Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital |
title_full | Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital |
title_fullStr | Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital |
title_short | Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital |
title_sort | real-world clinical impact of netarsudil 0.02% at an urban safety-net hospital |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33983847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2020.0112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fridmangabrielle realworldclinicalimpactofnetarsudil002atanurbansafetynethospital AT sadlaknatalie realworldclinicalimpactofnetarsudil002atanurbansafetynethospital AT eliassiradbabak realworldclinicalimpactofnetarsudil002atanurbansafetynethospital AT desaimanishia realworldclinicalimpactofnetarsudil002atanurbansafetynethospital |