Cargando…

Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital

Purpose: To analyze the efficacy, safety, and accessibility of netarsudil 0.02% in patients with glaucoma (suspect, open or closed) at a safety-net academic medical center, Boston Medical Center (BMC). Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients prescribed netarsudil 0.02% for uncontrolled glauc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fridman, Gabrielle, Sadlak, Natalie, Eliassi-Rad, Babak, Desai, Manishi A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33983847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2020.0112
_version_ 1783732225513095168
author Fridman, Gabrielle
Sadlak, Natalie
Eliassi-Rad, Babak
Desai, Manishi A.
author_facet Fridman, Gabrielle
Sadlak, Natalie
Eliassi-Rad, Babak
Desai, Manishi A.
author_sort Fridman, Gabrielle
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To analyze the efficacy, safety, and accessibility of netarsudil 0.02% in patients with glaucoma (suspect, open or closed) at a safety-net academic medical center, Boston Medical Center (BMC). Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients prescribed netarsudil 0.02% for uncontrolled glaucoma at BMC between December 2017 and September 2019. Outcome measures included change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline and evaluation of adverse events (AEs). Results: One hundred thirty patients (60% severe stage) were analyzed. The IOP reduction from baseline was about 3 mmHg. Fifty-four patients (42%) experienced an AE (eg, conjunctival hyperemia). Thirty-eight patients (29%) started netarsudil 0.02% in lieu of laser or surgery. Ninety-nine patients (71%) required prior authorization for insurance coverage of netarsudil 0.02%. Ten patients (7%) were unable to obtain netarsudil 0.02% due to issues with insurance coverage. Conclusion: Netarsudil 0.02% yielded significant IOP reduction in our cohort, however, to a smaller degree compared with prior studies that bore equivocal IOP reduction regardless of baseline IOP. Conjunctival hyperemia was the most common AE. In a limited number of patients, netarsudil 0.02% was not covered by insurance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8328041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83280412021-08-02 Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital Fridman, Gabrielle Sadlak, Natalie Eliassi-Rad, Babak Desai, Manishi A. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Original Articles Purpose: To analyze the efficacy, safety, and accessibility of netarsudil 0.02% in patients with glaucoma (suspect, open or closed) at a safety-net academic medical center, Boston Medical Center (BMC). Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients prescribed netarsudil 0.02% for uncontrolled glaucoma at BMC between December 2017 and September 2019. Outcome measures included change in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline and evaluation of adverse events (AEs). Results: One hundred thirty patients (60% severe stage) were analyzed. The IOP reduction from baseline was about 3 mmHg. Fifty-four patients (42%) experienced an AE (eg, conjunctival hyperemia). Thirty-eight patients (29%) started netarsudil 0.02% in lieu of laser or surgery. Ninety-nine patients (71%) required prior authorization for insurance coverage of netarsudil 0.02%. Ten patients (7%) were unable to obtain netarsudil 0.02% due to issues with insurance coverage. Conclusion: Netarsudil 0.02% yielded significant IOP reduction in our cohort, however, to a smaller degree compared with prior studies that bore equivocal IOP reduction regardless of baseline IOP. Conjunctival hyperemia was the most common AE. In a limited number of patients, netarsudil 0.02% was not covered by insurance. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021-08-01 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8328041/ /pubmed/33983847 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2020.0112 Text en © Gabrielle Fridman et al. 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License [CC-BY-NC] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fridman, Gabrielle
Sadlak, Natalie
Eliassi-Rad, Babak
Desai, Manishi A.
Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital
title Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital
title_full Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital
title_fullStr Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital
title_short Real-World Clinical Impact of Netarsudil 0.02% at an Urban Safety-Net Hospital
title_sort real-world clinical impact of netarsudil 0.02% at an urban safety-net hospital
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33983847
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jop.2020.0112
work_keys_str_mv AT fridmangabrielle realworldclinicalimpactofnetarsudil002atanurbansafetynethospital
AT sadlaknatalie realworldclinicalimpactofnetarsudil002atanurbansafetynethospital
AT eliassiradbabak realworldclinicalimpactofnetarsudil002atanurbansafetynethospital
AT desaimanishia realworldclinicalimpactofnetarsudil002atanurbansafetynethospital