Cargando…

Are Smaller Emergency Departments More Prone to Volume Variability?

INTRODUCTION: Daily patient volume in emergency departments (ED) varies considerably between days and sites. Although studies have attempted to define “high-volume” days, no standard definition exists. Furthermore, it is not clear whether the frequency of high-volume days, by any definition, is rela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nourazari, Sara, Harding, Jonathan W., Davis, Samuel R., Litvak, Ori, Traub, Stephen J., Sanchez, Leon D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353994
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.2.49749
_version_ 1783732248738004992
author Nourazari, Sara
Harding, Jonathan W.
Davis, Samuel R.
Litvak, Ori
Traub, Stephen J.
Sanchez, Leon D.
author_facet Nourazari, Sara
Harding, Jonathan W.
Davis, Samuel R.
Litvak, Ori
Traub, Stephen J.
Sanchez, Leon D.
author_sort Nourazari, Sara
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Daily patient volume in emergency departments (ED) varies considerably between days and sites. Although studies have attempted to define “high-volume” days, no standard definition exists. Furthermore, it is not clear whether the frequency of high-volume days, by any definition, is related to the size of an ED. We aimed to determine the correlation between ED size and the frequency of high-volume days for various volume thresholds, and to develop a measure to identify high-volume days. METHODS: We queried retrospective patient arrival data including 1,682,374 patient visits from 32 EDs in 12 states between July 1, 2018–June 30, 2019 and developed linear regression models to determine the correlation between ED size and volume variability. In addition, we performed a regression analysis and applied the Pearson correlation test to investigate the significance of median daily volumes with respect to the percent of days that crossed four volume thresholds ranging from 5–20% (in 5% increments) greater than each site’s median daily volume. RESULTS: We found a strong negative correlation between ED median daily volume and volume variability (R(2) = 81.0%; P < 0.0001). In addition, the four regression models for the percent of days exceeding specified thresholds greater than their daily median volumes had R(2) values of 49.4%, 61.2%, 70.0%, and 71.8%, respectively, all with P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: We sought to determine whether smaller EDs experience high-volume days more frequently than larger EDs. We found that high-volume days, when defined as days with a count of arrivals at or above certain median-based thresholds, are significantly more likely to occur in lower-volume EDs than in higher-volume EDs. To the extent that EDs allocate resources and plan to staff based on median volumes, these results suggest that smaller EDs are more likely to experience unpredictable, volume-based staffing challenges and operational costs. Given the lack of a standard measure to define a high-volume day in an ED, we recommend 10% above the median daily volume as a metric, for its relevance, generalizability across a broad range of EDs, and computational simplicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8328166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83281662021-08-09 Are Smaller Emergency Departments More Prone to Volume Variability? Nourazari, Sara Harding, Jonathan W. Davis, Samuel R. Litvak, Ori Traub, Stephen J. Sanchez, Leon D. West J Emerg Med Emergency Department Operations INTRODUCTION: Daily patient volume in emergency departments (ED) varies considerably between days and sites. Although studies have attempted to define “high-volume” days, no standard definition exists. Furthermore, it is not clear whether the frequency of high-volume days, by any definition, is related to the size of an ED. We aimed to determine the correlation between ED size and the frequency of high-volume days for various volume thresholds, and to develop a measure to identify high-volume days. METHODS: We queried retrospective patient arrival data including 1,682,374 patient visits from 32 EDs in 12 states between July 1, 2018–June 30, 2019 and developed linear regression models to determine the correlation between ED size and volume variability. In addition, we performed a regression analysis and applied the Pearson correlation test to investigate the significance of median daily volumes with respect to the percent of days that crossed four volume thresholds ranging from 5–20% (in 5% increments) greater than each site’s median daily volume. RESULTS: We found a strong negative correlation between ED median daily volume and volume variability (R(2) = 81.0%; P < 0.0001). In addition, the four regression models for the percent of days exceeding specified thresholds greater than their daily median volumes had R(2) values of 49.4%, 61.2%, 70.0%, and 71.8%, respectively, all with P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: We sought to determine whether smaller EDs experience high-volume days more frequently than larger EDs. We found that high-volume days, when defined as days with a count of arrivals at or above certain median-based thresholds, are significantly more likely to occur in lower-volume EDs than in higher-volume EDs. To the extent that EDs allocate resources and plan to staff based on median volumes, these results suggest that smaller EDs are more likely to experience unpredictable, volume-based staffing challenges and operational costs. Given the lack of a standard measure to define a high-volume day in an ED, we recommend 10% above the median daily volume as a metric, for its relevance, generalizability across a broad range of EDs, and computational simplicity. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2021-07 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8328166/ /pubmed/35353994 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.2.49749 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Nourazari et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Emergency Department Operations
Nourazari, Sara
Harding, Jonathan W.
Davis, Samuel R.
Litvak, Ori
Traub, Stephen J.
Sanchez, Leon D.
Are Smaller Emergency Departments More Prone to Volume Variability?
title Are Smaller Emergency Departments More Prone to Volume Variability?
title_full Are Smaller Emergency Departments More Prone to Volume Variability?
title_fullStr Are Smaller Emergency Departments More Prone to Volume Variability?
title_full_unstemmed Are Smaller Emergency Departments More Prone to Volume Variability?
title_short Are Smaller Emergency Departments More Prone to Volume Variability?
title_sort are smaller emergency departments more prone to volume variability?
topic Emergency Department Operations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353994
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.2.49749
work_keys_str_mv AT nourazarisara aresmalleremergencydepartmentsmorepronetovolumevariability
AT hardingjonathanw aresmalleremergencydepartmentsmorepronetovolumevariability
AT davissamuelr aresmalleremergencydepartmentsmorepronetovolumevariability
AT litvakori aresmalleremergencydepartmentsmorepronetovolumevariability
AT traubstephenj aresmalleremergencydepartmentsmorepronetovolumevariability
AT sanchezleond aresmalleremergencydepartmentsmorepronetovolumevariability