Cargando…

The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule

INTRODUCTION: Increases in emergency department (ED) crowding and boarding are a nationwide issue resulting in worsening patient care and throughput. To compensate, ED administrators often look to modifying staffing models to improve efficiencies. METHODS: This study evaluates the impact of implemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spiegelman, Lindsey, Jen, Maxwell, Matonis, Danielle, Gibney, Ryan, Saadat, Soheil, Sakaria, Sangeeta, Wray, Alisa, Toohey, Shannon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353992
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.2.50249
_version_ 1783732250415726592
author Spiegelman, Lindsey
Jen, Maxwell
Matonis, Danielle
Gibney, Ryan
Saadat, Soheil
Sakaria, Sangeeta
Wray, Alisa
Toohey, Shannon
author_facet Spiegelman, Lindsey
Jen, Maxwell
Matonis, Danielle
Gibney, Ryan
Saadat, Soheil
Sakaria, Sangeeta
Wray, Alisa
Toohey, Shannon
author_sort Spiegelman, Lindsey
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Increases in emergency department (ED) crowding and boarding are a nationwide issue resulting in worsening patient care and throughput. To compensate, ED administrators often look to modifying staffing models to improve efficiencies. METHODS: This study evaluates the impact of implementing the waterfall model of physician staffing on door-to-doctor time (DDOC), door-to-disposition time (DDIS), left without being seen (LWBS) rate, elopement rate, and the number of patient sign-outs. We examined 9,082 pre-intervention ED visits and 8,983 post-intervention ED visits. RESULTS: The change in DDOC, LWBS rate, and elopement rate demonstrated statistically significant improvement from a mean of 65.1 to 35 minutes (P <0.001), 1.12% to 0.92% (P = 0.004), and 3.96% to 1.95% (P <0.001), respectively. The change in DDIS from 312 to 324.7 minutes was not statistically significant (P = 0.310). The number of patient sign-outs increased after the implementation of a waterfall schedule (P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementing a waterfall schedule improved DDOC time while decreasing the percentage of patients who LWBS and eloped. The DDIS and number of patient sign-outs appears to have increased post implementation, although this may have been confounded by the increase in patient volumes and ED boarding from the pre- to post-intervention period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8328172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83281722021-08-09 The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule Spiegelman, Lindsey Jen, Maxwell Matonis, Danielle Gibney, Ryan Saadat, Soheil Sakaria, Sangeeta Wray, Alisa Toohey, Shannon West J Emerg Med Emergency Department Operations INTRODUCTION: Increases in emergency department (ED) crowding and boarding are a nationwide issue resulting in worsening patient care and throughput. To compensate, ED administrators often look to modifying staffing models to improve efficiencies. METHODS: This study evaluates the impact of implementing the waterfall model of physician staffing on door-to-doctor time (DDOC), door-to-disposition time (DDIS), left without being seen (LWBS) rate, elopement rate, and the number of patient sign-outs. We examined 9,082 pre-intervention ED visits and 8,983 post-intervention ED visits. RESULTS: The change in DDOC, LWBS rate, and elopement rate demonstrated statistically significant improvement from a mean of 65.1 to 35 minutes (P <0.001), 1.12% to 0.92% (P = 0.004), and 3.96% to 1.95% (P <0.001), respectively. The change in DDIS from 312 to 324.7 minutes was not statistically significant (P = 0.310). The number of patient sign-outs increased after the implementation of a waterfall schedule (P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementing a waterfall schedule improved DDOC time while decreasing the percentage of patients who LWBS and eloped. The DDIS and number of patient sign-outs appears to have increased post implementation, although this may have been confounded by the increase in patient volumes and ED boarding from the pre- to post-intervention period. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2021-07 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8328172/ /pubmed/35353992 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.2.50249 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Spiegelman et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Emergency Department Operations
Spiegelman, Lindsey
Jen, Maxwell
Matonis, Danielle
Gibney, Ryan
Saadat, Soheil
Sakaria, Sangeeta
Wray, Alisa
Toohey, Shannon
The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule
title The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule
title_full The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule
title_fullStr The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule
title_short The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule
title_sort effects of implementing a “waterfall” emergency physician attending schedule
topic Emergency Department Operations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353992
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.2.50249
work_keys_str_mv AT spiegelmanlindsey theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT jenmaxwell theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT matonisdanielle theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT gibneyryan theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT saadatsoheil theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT sakariasangeeta theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT wrayalisa theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT tooheyshannon theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT spiegelmanlindsey effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT jenmaxwell effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT matonisdanielle effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT gibneyryan effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT saadatsoheil effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT sakariasangeeta effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT wrayalisa effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule
AT tooheyshannon effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule