Cargando…
The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule
INTRODUCTION: Increases in emergency department (ED) crowding and boarding are a nationwide issue resulting in worsening patient care and throughput. To compensate, ED administrators often look to modifying staffing models to improve efficiencies. METHODS: This study evaluates the impact of implemen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353992 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.2.50249 |
_version_ | 1783732250415726592 |
---|---|
author | Spiegelman, Lindsey Jen, Maxwell Matonis, Danielle Gibney, Ryan Saadat, Soheil Sakaria, Sangeeta Wray, Alisa Toohey, Shannon |
author_facet | Spiegelman, Lindsey Jen, Maxwell Matonis, Danielle Gibney, Ryan Saadat, Soheil Sakaria, Sangeeta Wray, Alisa Toohey, Shannon |
author_sort | Spiegelman, Lindsey |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Increases in emergency department (ED) crowding and boarding are a nationwide issue resulting in worsening patient care and throughput. To compensate, ED administrators often look to modifying staffing models to improve efficiencies. METHODS: This study evaluates the impact of implementing the waterfall model of physician staffing on door-to-doctor time (DDOC), door-to-disposition time (DDIS), left without being seen (LWBS) rate, elopement rate, and the number of patient sign-outs. We examined 9,082 pre-intervention ED visits and 8,983 post-intervention ED visits. RESULTS: The change in DDOC, LWBS rate, and elopement rate demonstrated statistically significant improvement from a mean of 65.1 to 35 minutes (P <0.001), 1.12% to 0.92% (P = 0.004), and 3.96% to 1.95% (P <0.001), respectively. The change in DDIS from 312 to 324.7 minutes was not statistically significant (P = 0.310). The number of patient sign-outs increased after the implementation of a waterfall schedule (P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementing a waterfall schedule improved DDOC time while decreasing the percentage of patients who LWBS and eloped. The DDIS and number of patient sign-outs appears to have increased post implementation, although this may have been confounded by the increase in patient volumes and ED boarding from the pre- to post-intervention period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8328172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83281722021-08-09 The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule Spiegelman, Lindsey Jen, Maxwell Matonis, Danielle Gibney, Ryan Saadat, Soheil Sakaria, Sangeeta Wray, Alisa Toohey, Shannon West J Emerg Med Emergency Department Operations INTRODUCTION: Increases in emergency department (ED) crowding and boarding are a nationwide issue resulting in worsening patient care and throughput. To compensate, ED administrators often look to modifying staffing models to improve efficiencies. METHODS: This study evaluates the impact of implementing the waterfall model of physician staffing on door-to-doctor time (DDOC), door-to-disposition time (DDIS), left without being seen (LWBS) rate, elopement rate, and the number of patient sign-outs. We examined 9,082 pre-intervention ED visits and 8,983 post-intervention ED visits. RESULTS: The change in DDOC, LWBS rate, and elopement rate demonstrated statistically significant improvement from a mean of 65.1 to 35 minutes (P <0.001), 1.12% to 0.92% (P = 0.004), and 3.96% to 1.95% (P <0.001), respectively. The change in DDIS from 312 to 324.7 minutes was not statistically significant (P = 0.310). The number of patient sign-outs increased after the implementation of a waterfall schedule (P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementing a waterfall schedule improved DDOC time while decreasing the percentage of patients who LWBS and eloped. The DDIS and number of patient sign-outs appears to have increased post implementation, although this may have been confounded by the increase in patient volumes and ED boarding from the pre- to post-intervention period. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2021-07 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8328172/ /pubmed/35353992 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.2.50249 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Spiegelman et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Emergency Department Operations Spiegelman, Lindsey Jen, Maxwell Matonis, Danielle Gibney, Ryan Saadat, Soheil Sakaria, Sangeeta Wray, Alisa Toohey, Shannon The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule |
title | The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule |
title_full | The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule |
title_short | The Effects of Implementing a “Waterfall” Emergency Physician Attending Schedule |
title_sort | effects of implementing a “waterfall” emergency physician attending schedule |
topic | Emergency Department Operations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35353992 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.2.50249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spiegelmanlindsey theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT jenmaxwell theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT matonisdanielle theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT gibneyryan theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT saadatsoheil theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT sakariasangeeta theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT wrayalisa theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT tooheyshannon theeffectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT spiegelmanlindsey effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT jenmaxwell effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT matonisdanielle effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT gibneyryan effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT saadatsoheil effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT sakariasangeeta effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT wrayalisa effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule AT tooheyshannon effectsofimplementingawaterfallemergencyphysicianattendingschedule |