Cargando…

Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study

INTRODUCTION: Voters facing illness or disability are disproportionately under-represented in terms of voter turnout. Earlier research has indicated that enfranchisement of these populations may reinforce the implementation of policies improving health outcomes and equity. Due to the confluence of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Oliver Y., Wong, Kelly E., Ganguli, Reetam, Zahiri, Keyana, Burns, Nicole M., Paracha, Saba, Kozel, Giovanni, Tang, Kevin P., Schuur, Jeremiah D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354012
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.4.50884
_version_ 1783732250766999552
author Tang, Oliver Y.
Wong, Kelly E.
Ganguli, Reetam
Zahiri, Keyana
Burns, Nicole M.
Paracha, Saba
Kozel, Giovanni
Tang, Kevin P.
Schuur, Jeremiah D.
author_facet Tang, Oliver Y.
Wong, Kelly E.
Ganguli, Reetam
Zahiri, Keyana
Burns, Nicole M.
Paracha, Saba
Kozel, Giovanni
Tang, Kevin P.
Schuur, Jeremiah D.
author_sort Tang, Oliver Y.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Voters facing illness or disability are disproportionately under-represented in terms of voter turnout. Earlier research has indicated that enfranchisement of these populations may reinforce the implementation of policies improving health outcomes and equity. Due to the confluence of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the 2020 election, we aimed to assess emergency absentee voting processes, which allow voters hospitalized after regular absentee deadlines to still obtain an absentee ballot, and election changes due to COVID-19 in all 50 states. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study collecting 34 variables pertaining to emergency voting processes and COVID-19-related election changes, including deadlines, methods of submission for applications and ballots, and specialized services for patients. Data were obtained from, in order of priority, state boards of elections websites, poll worker manuals, application forms, and state legislation. We verified all data through direct correspondence with state boards of elections. RESULTS: Emergency absentee voting processes are in place in 39 states, with the remaining states having universal vote-by-mail (n = 5) or extended regular absentee voting deadlines (n = 6). The emergency absentee period most commonly began within 24 hours following the normal absentee application deadline, which was often seven days before an election (n = 11). Unique aspects of emergency voting processes included patients designating an “authorized agent” to deliver their applications and ballots (n = 38), electronic ballot delivery (n = 5), and in-person teams that deliver ballots directly to patients (n = 18). Documented barriers in these processes nationwide include unavailable online information (n = 11), restrictions mandating agents to be family members (n = 7), physician affidavits or signatures (n = 9), and notary or witness signature requirements (n = 15). For the November 2020 presidential election, 12 states expanded absentee eligibility to allow COVID-19 as a reason to request an absentee ballot, and 18 states mailed absentee ballot applications or absentee ballots to all registered voters. CONCLUSION: While 39 states operate emergency absentee voting processes for hospitalized voters, there are considerable areas for improvement and heterogeneity in guidelines for these protocols. For future election cycles, information on emergency voting and broader election reforms due to COVID-19 may be useful for emergency providers and patients alike to improve the democratic participation of voters experiencing illness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8328173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83281732021-08-09 Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study Tang, Oliver Y. Wong, Kelly E. Ganguli, Reetam Zahiri, Keyana Burns, Nicole M. Paracha, Saba Kozel, Giovanni Tang, Kevin P. Schuur, Jeremiah D. West J Emerg Med Health Policy Analysis INTRODUCTION: Voters facing illness or disability are disproportionately under-represented in terms of voter turnout. Earlier research has indicated that enfranchisement of these populations may reinforce the implementation of policies improving health outcomes and equity. Due to the confluence of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the 2020 election, we aimed to assess emergency absentee voting processes, which allow voters hospitalized after regular absentee deadlines to still obtain an absentee ballot, and election changes due to COVID-19 in all 50 states. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study collecting 34 variables pertaining to emergency voting processes and COVID-19-related election changes, including deadlines, methods of submission for applications and ballots, and specialized services for patients. Data were obtained from, in order of priority, state boards of elections websites, poll worker manuals, application forms, and state legislation. We verified all data through direct correspondence with state boards of elections. RESULTS: Emergency absentee voting processes are in place in 39 states, with the remaining states having universal vote-by-mail (n = 5) or extended regular absentee voting deadlines (n = 6). The emergency absentee period most commonly began within 24 hours following the normal absentee application deadline, which was often seven days before an election (n = 11). Unique aspects of emergency voting processes included patients designating an “authorized agent” to deliver their applications and ballots (n = 38), electronic ballot delivery (n = 5), and in-person teams that deliver ballots directly to patients (n = 18). Documented barriers in these processes nationwide include unavailable online information (n = 11), restrictions mandating agents to be family members (n = 7), physician affidavits or signatures (n = 9), and notary or witness signature requirements (n = 15). For the November 2020 presidential election, 12 states expanded absentee eligibility to allow COVID-19 as a reason to request an absentee ballot, and 18 states mailed absentee ballot applications or absentee ballots to all registered voters. CONCLUSION: While 39 states operate emergency absentee voting processes for hospitalized voters, there are considerable areas for improvement and heterogeneity in guidelines for these protocols. For future election cycles, information on emergency voting and broader election reforms due to COVID-19 may be useful for emergency providers and patients alike to improve the democratic participation of voters experiencing illness. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2021-07 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8328173/ /pubmed/35354012 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.4.50884 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Tang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Health Policy Analysis
Tang, Oliver Y.
Wong, Kelly E.
Ganguli, Reetam
Zahiri, Keyana
Burns, Nicole M.
Paracha, Saba
Kozel, Giovanni
Tang, Kevin P.
Schuur, Jeremiah D.
Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study
title Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study
title_full Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study
title_fullStr Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study
title_full_unstemmed Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study
title_short Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study
title_sort emergency absentee voting for hospitalized patients and voting during covid-19: a 50-state study
topic Health Policy Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354012
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.4.50884
work_keys_str_mv AT tangolivery emergencyabsenteevotingforhospitalizedpatientsandvotingduringcovid19a50statestudy
AT wongkellye emergencyabsenteevotingforhospitalizedpatientsandvotingduringcovid19a50statestudy
AT gangulireetam emergencyabsenteevotingforhospitalizedpatientsandvotingduringcovid19a50statestudy
AT zahirikeyana emergencyabsenteevotingforhospitalizedpatientsandvotingduringcovid19a50statestudy
AT burnsnicolem emergencyabsenteevotingforhospitalizedpatientsandvotingduringcovid19a50statestudy
AT parachasaba emergencyabsenteevotingforhospitalizedpatientsandvotingduringcovid19a50statestudy
AT kozelgiovanni emergencyabsenteevotingforhospitalizedpatientsandvotingduringcovid19a50statestudy
AT tangkevinp emergencyabsenteevotingforhospitalizedpatientsandvotingduringcovid19a50statestudy
AT schuurjeremiahd emergencyabsenteevotingforhospitalizedpatientsandvotingduringcovid19a50statestudy