Cargando…

CRISPR Typing Increases the Discriminatory Power of Streptococcus agalactiae Typing Methods

We explored the relevance of a Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based genotyping tool for Streptococcus agalactiae typing and we compared this method to current molecular methods [multi locus sequence typing (MLST) and capsular typing]. To this effect, we developed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beauruelle, Clémence, Treluyer, Ludovic, Pastuszka, Adeline, Cochard, Thierry, Lier, Clément, Mereghetti, Laurent, Glaser, Philippe, Poyart, Claire, Lanotte, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349737
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.675597
_version_ 1783732256100057088
author Beauruelle, Clémence
Treluyer, Ludovic
Pastuszka, Adeline
Cochard, Thierry
Lier, Clément
Mereghetti, Laurent
Glaser, Philippe
Poyart, Claire
Lanotte, Philippe
author_facet Beauruelle, Clémence
Treluyer, Ludovic
Pastuszka, Adeline
Cochard, Thierry
Lier, Clément
Mereghetti, Laurent
Glaser, Philippe
Poyart, Claire
Lanotte, Philippe
author_sort Beauruelle, Clémence
collection PubMed
description We explored the relevance of a Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based genotyping tool for Streptococcus agalactiae typing and we compared this method to current molecular methods [multi locus sequence typing (MLST) and capsular typing]. To this effect, we developed two CRISPR marker schemes (using 94 or 25 markers, respectively). Among the 255 S. agalactiae isolates tested, 229 CRISPR profiles were obtained. The 94 and 25 markers made it possible to efficiently separate isolates with a high diversity index (0.9947 and 0.9267, respectively), highlighting a high discriminatory power, superior to that of both capsular typing and MLST (diversity index of 0.9017 for MLST). This method has the advantage of being correlated with MLST [through analysis of the terminal direct repeat (TDR) and ancestral spacers] and to possess a high discriminatory power (through analysis of the leader-end spacers recently acquired, which are the witnesses of genetic mobile elements encountered by the bacteria). Furthermore, this “one-shot” approach presents the benefit of much-reduced time and cost in comparison with MLST. On the basis of these data, we propose that this method could become a reference method for group B Streptococcus (GBS) typing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8328194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83281942021-08-03 CRISPR Typing Increases the Discriminatory Power of Streptococcus agalactiae Typing Methods Beauruelle, Clémence Treluyer, Ludovic Pastuszka, Adeline Cochard, Thierry Lier, Clément Mereghetti, Laurent Glaser, Philippe Poyart, Claire Lanotte, Philippe Front Microbiol Microbiology We explored the relevance of a Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based genotyping tool for Streptococcus agalactiae typing and we compared this method to current molecular methods [multi locus sequence typing (MLST) and capsular typing]. To this effect, we developed two CRISPR marker schemes (using 94 or 25 markers, respectively). Among the 255 S. agalactiae isolates tested, 229 CRISPR profiles were obtained. The 94 and 25 markers made it possible to efficiently separate isolates with a high diversity index (0.9947 and 0.9267, respectively), highlighting a high discriminatory power, superior to that of both capsular typing and MLST (diversity index of 0.9017 for MLST). This method has the advantage of being correlated with MLST [through analysis of the terminal direct repeat (TDR) and ancestral spacers] and to possess a high discriminatory power (through analysis of the leader-end spacers recently acquired, which are the witnesses of genetic mobile elements encountered by the bacteria). Furthermore, this “one-shot” approach presents the benefit of much-reduced time and cost in comparison with MLST. On the basis of these data, we propose that this method could become a reference method for group B Streptococcus (GBS) typing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8328194/ /pubmed/34349737 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.675597 Text en Copyright © 2021 Beauruelle, Treluyer, Pastuszka, Cochard, Lier, Mereghetti, Glaser, Poyart and Lanotte. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Beauruelle, Clémence
Treluyer, Ludovic
Pastuszka, Adeline
Cochard, Thierry
Lier, Clément
Mereghetti, Laurent
Glaser, Philippe
Poyart, Claire
Lanotte, Philippe
CRISPR Typing Increases the Discriminatory Power of Streptococcus agalactiae Typing Methods
title CRISPR Typing Increases the Discriminatory Power of Streptococcus agalactiae Typing Methods
title_full CRISPR Typing Increases the Discriminatory Power of Streptococcus agalactiae Typing Methods
title_fullStr CRISPR Typing Increases the Discriminatory Power of Streptococcus agalactiae Typing Methods
title_full_unstemmed CRISPR Typing Increases the Discriminatory Power of Streptococcus agalactiae Typing Methods
title_short CRISPR Typing Increases the Discriminatory Power of Streptococcus agalactiae Typing Methods
title_sort crispr typing increases the discriminatory power of streptococcus agalactiae typing methods
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349737
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.675597
work_keys_str_mv AT beauruelleclemence crisprtypingincreasesthediscriminatorypowerofstreptococcusagalactiaetypingmethods
AT treluyerludovic crisprtypingincreasesthediscriminatorypowerofstreptococcusagalactiaetypingmethods
AT pastuszkaadeline crisprtypingincreasesthediscriminatorypowerofstreptococcusagalactiaetypingmethods
AT cochardthierry crisprtypingincreasesthediscriminatorypowerofstreptococcusagalactiaetypingmethods
AT lierclement crisprtypingincreasesthediscriminatorypowerofstreptococcusagalactiaetypingmethods
AT mereghettilaurent crisprtypingincreasesthediscriminatorypowerofstreptococcusagalactiaetypingmethods
AT glaserphilippe crisprtypingincreasesthediscriminatorypowerofstreptococcusagalactiaetypingmethods
AT poyartclaire crisprtypingincreasesthediscriminatorypowerofstreptococcusagalactiaetypingmethods
AT lanottephilippe crisprtypingincreasesthediscriminatorypowerofstreptococcusagalactiaetypingmethods