Cargando…
Academic Electronic Health Records in Undergraduate Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study
BACKGROUND: Teaching students about electronic health records presents challenges for most nursing programs, primarily because of the limited training opportunities within clinical practice settings. A simulated electronic health record is an experiential, learner-centered strategy that enables stud...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34345797 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26944 |
_version_ | 1783732270545240064 |
---|---|
author | Kleib, Manal Jackman, Deirdre Duarte Wisnesky, Uirá Ali, Shamsa |
author_facet | Kleib, Manal Jackman, Deirdre Duarte Wisnesky, Uirá Ali, Shamsa |
author_sort | Kleib, Manal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Teaching students about electronic health records presents challenges for most nursing programs, primarily because of the limited training opportunities within clinical practice settings. A simulated electronic health record is an experiential, learner-centered strategy that enables students to acquire and apply the informatics knowledge needed for working with electronic records in a safe learning environment before the students have encounters with real patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to provide a preliminary evaluation of the Lippincott DocuCare simulated electronic health record and determine the feasibility issues associated with its implementation. METHODS: We used one-group pretest-posttest, surveys, and focus group interviews with students and instructors to pilot the DocuCare simulated electronic health record within an undergraduate nursing program in Western Canada. Volunteering students worked through 4 case scenarios during a 1-month pilot. Self-reported informatics knowledge and attitudes toward the electronic health record, accuracy of computerized documentation, satisfaction, and students’ and educators’ experiences were examined. Demographic and general information regarding informatics learning was also collected. RESULTS: Although 23 students participated in this study, only 13 completed surveys were included in the analysis. Almost two-thirds of the students indicated their overall understanding of nursing informatics as being fair or inadequate. The two-tailed paired samples t test used to evaluate the impact of DocuCare on students’ self-reported informatics knowledge and attitudes toward the electronic health record revealed a statistically significant difference in the mean score of knowledge before and after using DocuCare (before: mean 2.95, SD 0.58; after: mean 3.83, SD 0.39; t(12)=5.80, two-tailed; P<.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean scores of attitudes toward the electronic health record before and after using DocuCare (before: mean 3.75, SD 0.40; after: mean 3.70, SD 0.34; t(12)=0.39, two-tailed; P=.70). Students’ documentation scores varied from somewhat accurate to completely accurate; however, performance improved for the majority of students as they progressed from case scenarios 1 to 4. Both the faculty and students were highly satisfied with DocuCare and highly recommended its integration. Focus groups with 7 students and 3 educators revealed multiple themes. The participants shared suggestions regarding the DocuCare product customization and strategies for potential integration in undergraduate nursing programs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility and suitability of the DocuCare program as a tool to enhance students’ learning about informatics and computerized documentation in electronic health records. Recommendations will be made to academic leadership in undergraduate programs on the basis of this study. Furthermore, a controlled evaluation study will be conducted in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8328266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83282662021-08-02 Academic Electronic Health Records in Undergraduate Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study Kleib, Manal Jackman, Deirdre Duarte Wisnesky, Uirá Ali, Shamsa JMIR Nurs Original Paper BACKGROUND: Teaching students about electronic health records presents challenges for most nursing programs, primarily because of the limited training opportunities within clinical practice settings. A simulated electronic health record is an experiential, learner-centered strategy that enables students to acquire and apply the informatics knowledge needed for working with electronic records in a safe learning environment before the students have encounters with real patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to provide a preliminary evaluation of the Lippincott DocuCare simulated electronic health record and determine the feasibility issues associated with its implementation. METHODS: We used one-group pretest-posttest, surveys, and focus group interviews with students and instructors to pilot the DocuCare simulated electronic health record within an undergraduate nursing program in Western Canada. Volunteering students worked through 4 case scenarios during a 1-month pilot. Self-reported informatics knowledge and attitudes toward the electronic health record, accuracy of computerized documentation, satisfaction, and students’ and educators’ experiences were examined. Demographic and general information regarding informatics learning was also collected. RESULTS: Although 23 students participated in this study, only 13 completed surveys were included in the analysis. Almost two-thirds of the students indicated their overall understanding of nursing informatics as being fair or inadequate. The two-tailed paired samples t test used to evaluate the impact of DocuCare on students’ self-reported informatics knowledge and attitudes toward the electronic health record revealed a statistically significant difference in the mean score of knowledge before and after using DocuCare (before: mean 2.95, SD 0.58; after: mean 3.83, SD 0.39; t(12)=5.80, two-tailed; P<.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean scores of attitudes toward the electronic health record before and after using DocuCare (before: mean 3.75, SD 0.40; after: mean 3.70, SD 0.34; t(12)=0.39, two-tailed; P=.70). Students’ documentation scores varied from somewhat accurate to completely accurate; however, performance improved for the majority of students as they progressed from case scenarios 1 to 4. Both the faculty and students were highly satisfied with DocuCare and highly recommended its integration. Focus groups with 7 students and 3 educators revealed multiple themes. The participants shared suggestions regarding the DocuCare product customization and strategies for potential integration in undergraduate nursing programs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility and suitability of the DocuCare program as a tool to enhance students’ learning about informatics and computerized documentation in electronic health records. Recommendations will be made to academic leadership in undergraduate programs on the basis of this study. Furthermore, a controlled evaluation study will be conducted in the future. JMIR Publications 2021-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8328266/ /pubmed/34345797 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26944 Text en ©Manal Kleib, Deirdre Jackman, Uirá Duarte Wisnesky, Shamsa Ali. Originally published in JMIR Nursing (https://nursing.jmir.org), 27.04.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Nursing, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://nursing.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kleib, Manal Jackman, Deirdre Duarte Wisnesky, Uirá Ali, Shamsa Academic Electronic Health Records in Undergraduate Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study |
title | Academic Electronic Health Records in Undergraduate Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study |
title_full | Academic Electronic Health Records in Undergraduate Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Academic Electronic Health Records in Undergraduate Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Academic Electronic Health Records in Undergraduate Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study |
title_short | Academic Electronic Health Records in Undergraduate Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study |
title_sort | academic electronic health records in undergraduate nursing education: mixed methods pilot study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34345797 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26944 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kleibmanal academicelectronichealthrecordsinundergraduatenursingeducationmixedmethodspilotstudy AT jackmandeirdre academicelectronichealthrecordsinundergraduatenursingeducationmixedmethodspilotstudy AT duartewisneskyuira academicelectronichealthrecordsinundergraduatenursingeducationmixedmethodspilotstudy AT alishamsa academicelectronichealthrecordsinundergraduatenursingeducationmixedmethodspilotstudy |