Cargando…

The Cost of the Epistemic Step: Investigating Scalar Implicatures in Full and Partial Information Contexts

We present the first ERP experiments that test the online processing of the scalar implicature some ⇝ not all in contexts where the speaker competence assumption is violated. Participants observe game scenarios with four open cards on the table and two closed cards outside of the table, while listen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spychalska, Maria, Reimer, Ludmila, Schumacher, Petra B., Werning, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349701
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679491
_version_ 1783732303250325504
author Spychalska, Maria
Reimer, Ludmila
Schumacher, Petra B.
Werning, Markus
author_facet Spychalska, Maria
Reimer, Ludmila
Schumacher, Petra B.
Werning, Markus
author_sort Spychalska, Maria
collection PubMed
description We present the first ERP experiments that test the online processing of the scalar implicature some ⇝ not all in contexts where the speaker competence assumption is violated. Participants observe game scenarios with four open cards on the table and two closed cards outside of the table, while listening to statements made by a virtual player. In the full access context, the player makes a fully informed statement by referring only to the open cards, as cards on the table; in the partial access context, she makes a partially informed statement by referring to the whole set of cards, as cards in the game. If all of the open cards contain a given object X (Fullset condition), then some cards on the table contain Xs is inconsistent with the not all reading, whereas it is unknown whether some cards in the game contain X is consistent with this reading. If only a subset of the open cards contains X (Subset condition), then both utterances are known to be consistent with the not all implicature. Differential effects are observed depending on the quantifier reading adopted by the participant: For those participants who adopt the not all reading in the full access context, but not in the partial access context (weak pragmatic reading), a late posterior negativity effect is observed in the partial access context for the Fullset relative to the Subset condition. This effect is argued to reflect inference-driven context retrieval and monitoring processes related to epistemic reasoning involved in evaluating the competence assumption. By contrast, for participants who adopt the logical interpretation of some (some and possibly all), an N400 effect is observed in the partial access context, when comparing the Subset against the Fullset condition, which is argued to result from the competition between the two quantifying expressions some cards on the table and some cards in the game functioning in the experiment as scalar alternatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8328393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83283932021-08-03 The Cost of the Epistemic Step: Investigating Scalar Implicatures in Full and Partial Information Contexts Spychalska, Maria Reimer, Ludmila Schumacher, Petra B. Werning, Markus Front Psychol Psychology We present the first ERP experiments that test the online processing of the scalar implicature some ⇝ not all in contexts where the speaker competence assumption is violated. Participants observe game scenarios with four open cards on the table and two closed cards outside of the table, while listening to statements made by a virtual player. In the full access context, the player makes a fully informed statement by referring only to the open cards, as cards on the table; in the partial access context, she makes a partially informed statement by referring to the whole set of cards, as cards in the game. If all of the open cards contain a given object X (Fullset condition), then some cards on the table contain Xs is inconsistent with the not all reading, whereas it is unknown whether some cards in the game contain X is consistent with this reading. If only a subset of the open cards contains X (Subset condition), then both utterances are known to be consistent with the not all implicature. Differential effects are observed depending on the quantifier reading adopted by the participant: For those participants who adopt the not all reading in the full access context, but not in the partial access context (weak pragmatic reading), a late posterior negativity effect is observed in the partial access context for the Fullset relative to the Subset condition. This effect is argued to reflect inference-driven context retrieval and monitoring processes related to epistemic reasoning involved in evaluating the competence assumption. By contrast, for participants who adopt the logical interpretation of some (some and possibly all), an N400 effect is observed in the partial access context, when comparing the Subset against the Fullset condition, which is argued to result from the competition between the two quantifying expressions some cards on the table and some cards in the game functioning in the experiment as scalar alternatives. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8328393/ /pubmed/34349701 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679491 Text en Copyright © 2021 Spychalska, Reimer, Schumacher and Werning. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Spychalska, Maria
Reimer, Ludmila
Schumacher, Petra B.
Werning, Markus
The Cost of the Epistemic Step: Investigating Scalar Implicatures in Full and Partial Information Contexts
title The Cost of the Epistemic Step: Investigating Scalar Implicatures in Full and Partial Information Contexts
title_full The Cost of the Epistemic Step: Investigating Scalar Implicatures in Full and Partial Information Contexts
title_fullStr The Cost of the Epistemic Step: Investigating Scalar Implicatures in Full and Partial Information Contexts
title_full_unstemmed The Cost of the Epistemic Step: Investigating Scalar Implicatures in Full and Partial Information Contexts
title_short The Cost of the Epistemic Step: Investigating Scalar Implicatures in Full and Partial Information Contexts
title_sort cost of the epistemic step: investigating scalar implicatures in full and partial information contexts
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34349701
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679491
work_keys_str_mv AT spychalskamaria thecostoftheepistemicstepinvestigatingscalarimplicaturesinfullandpartialinformationcontexts
AT reimerludmila thecostoftheepistemicstepinvestigatingscalarimplicaturesinfullandpartialinformationcontexts
AT schumacherpetrab thecostoftheepistemicstepinvestigatingscalarimplicaturesinfullandpartialinformationcontexts
AT werningmarkus thecostoftheepistemicstepinvestigatingscalarimplicaturesinfullandpartialinformationcontexts
AT spychalskamaria costoftheepistemicstepinvestigatingscalarimplicaturesinfullandpartialinformationcontexts
AT reimerludmila costoftheepistemicstepinvestigatingscalarimplicaturesinfullandpartialinformationcontexts
AT schumacherpetrab costoftheepistemicstepinvestigatingscalarimplicaturesinfullandpartialinformationcontexts
AT werningmarkus costoftheepistemicstepinvestigatingscalarimplicaturesinfullandpartialinformationcontexts