Cargando…

Cross‐continental comparison of parasite communities in a wide‐ranging carnivore suggests associations with prey diversity and host density

1. Parasites are integral to ecosystem functioning yet often overlooked. Improved understanding of host–parasite associations is important, particularly for wide‐ranging species for which host range shifts and climate change could alter host–parasite interactions and their effects on ecosystem funct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stronen, Astrid V., Molnar, Barbara, Ciucci, Paolo, Darimont, Chris T., Grottoli, Lorenza, Paquet, Paul C., Sallows, Tim, Smits, Judit E. G., Bryan, Heather M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7837
_version_ 1783732310648029184
author Stronen, Astrid V.
Molnar, Barbara
Ciucci, Paolo
Darimont, Chris T.
Grottoli, Lorenza
Paquet, Paul C.
Sallows, Tim
Smits, Judit E. G.
Bryan, Heather M.
author_facet Stronen, Astrid V.
Molnar, Barbara
Ciucci, Paolo
Darimont, Chris T.
Grottoli, Lorenza
Paquet, Paul C.
Sallows, Tim
Smits, Judit E. G.
Bryan, Heather M.
author_sort Stronen, Astrid V.
collection PubMed
description 1. Parasites are integral to ecosystem functioning yet often overlooked. Improved understanding of host–parasite associations is important, particularly for wide‐ranging species for which host range shifts and climate change could alter host–parasite interactions and their effects on ecosystem function. 2. Among the most widely distributed mammals with diverse diets, gray wolves (Canis lupus) host parasites that are transmitted among canids and via prey species. Wolf–parasite associations may therefore influence the population dynamics and ecological functions of both wolves and their prey. Our goal was to identify large‐scale processes that shape host–parasite interactions across populations, with the wolf as a model organism. 3. By compiling data from various studies, we examined the fecal prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in six wolf populations from two continents in relation to wolf density, diet diversity, and other ecological conditions. 4. As expected, we found that the fecal prevalence of parasites transmitted directly to wolves via contact with other canids or their excreta was positively associated with wolf density. Contrary to our expectations, the fecal prevalence of parasites transmitted via prey was negatively associated with prey diversity. We also found that parasite communities reflected landscape characteristics and specific prey items available to wolves. 5. Several parasite taxa identified in this study, including hookworms and coccidian protozoans, can cause morbidity and mortality in canids, especially in pups, or in combination with other stressors. The density–prevalence relationship for parasites with simple life cycles may reflect a regulatory role of gastrointestinal parasites on wolf populations. Our result that fecal prevalence of parasites was lower in wolves with more diverse diets could provide insight into the mechanisms by which biodiversity may regulate disease. A diverse suite of predator–prey interactions could regulate the effects of parasitism on prey populations and mitigate the transmission of infectious agents, including zoonoses, spread via trophic interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8328421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83284212021-08-06 Cross‐continental comparison of parasite communities in a wide‐ranging carnivore suggests associations with prey diversity and host density Stronen, Astrid V. Molnar, Barbara Ciucci, Paolo Darimont, Chris T. Grottoli, Lorenza Paquet, Paul C. Sallows, Tim Smits, Judit E. G. Bryan, Heather M. Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Parasites are integral to ecosystem functioning yet often overlooked. Improved understanding of host–parasite associations is important, particularly for wide‐ranging species for which host range shifts and climate change could alter host–parasite interactions and their effects on ecosystem function. 2. Among the most widely distributed mammals with diverse diets, gray wolves (Canis lupus) host parasites that are transmitted among canids and via prey species. Wolf–parasite associations may therefore influence the population dynamics and ecological functions of both wolves and their prey. Our goal was to identify large‐scale processes that shape host–parasite interactions across populations, with the wolf as a model organism. 3. By compiling data from various studies, we examined the fecal prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in six wolf populations from two continents in relation to wolf density, diet diversity, and other ecological conditions. 4. As expected, we found that the fecal prevalence of parasites transmitted directly to wolves via contact with other canids or their excreta was positively associated with wolf density. Contrary to our expectations, the fecal prevalence of parasites transmitted via prey was negatively associated with prey diversity. We also found that parasite communities reflected landscape characteristics and specific prey items available to wolves. 5. Several parasite taxa identified in this study, including hookworms and coccidian protozoans, can cause morbidity and mortality in canids, especially in pups, or in combination with other stressors. The density–prevalence relationship for parasites with simple life cycles may reflect a regulatory role of gastrointestinal parasites on wolf populations. Our result that fecal prevalence of parasites was lower in wolves with more diverse diets could provide insight into the mechanisms by which biodiversity may regulate disease. A diverse suite of predator–prey interactions could regulate the effects of parasitism on prey populations and mitigate the transmission of infectious agents, including zoonoses, spread via trophic interactions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8328421/ /pubmed/34367579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7837 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Stronen, Astrid V.
Molnar, Barbara
Ciucci, Paolo
Darimont, Chris T.
Grottoli, Lorenza
Paquet, Paul C.
Sallows, Tim
Smits, Judit E. G.
Bryan, Heather M.
Cross‐continental comparison of parasite communities in a wide‐ranging carnivore suggests associations with prey diversity and host density
title Cross‐continental comparison of parasite communities in a wide‐ranging carnivore suggests associations with prey diversity and host density
title_full Cross‐continental comparison of parasite communities in a wide‐ranging carnivore suggests associations with prey diversity and host density
title_fullStr Cross‐continental comparison of parasite communities in a wide‐ranging carnivore suggests associations with prey diversity and host density
title_full_unstemmed Cross‐continental comparison of parasite communities in a wide‐ranging carnivore suggests associations with prey diversity and host density
title_short Cross‐continental comparison of parasite communities in a wide‐ranging carnivore suggests associations with prey diversity and host density
title_sort cross‐continental comparison of parasite communities in a wide‐ranging carnivore suggests associations with prey diversity and host density
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7837
work_keys_str_mv AT stronenastridv crosscontinentalcomparisonofparasitecommunitiesinawiderangingcarnivoresuggestsassociationswithpreydiversityandhostdensity
AT molnarbarbara crosscontinentalcomparisonofparasitecommunitiesinawiderangingcarnivoresuggestsassociationswithpreydiversityandhostdensity
AT ciuccipaolo crosscontinentalcomparisonofparasitecommunitiesinawiderangingcarnivoresuggestsassociationswithpreydiversityandhostdensity
AT darimontchrist crosscontinentalcomparisonofparasitecommunitiesinawiderangingcarnivoresuggestsassociationswithpreydiversityandhostdensity
AT grottolilorenza crosscontinentalcomparisonofparasitecommunitiesinawiderangingcarnivoresuggestsassociationswithpreydiversityandhostdensity
AT paquetpaulc crosscontinentalcomparisonofparasitecommunitiesinawiderangingcarnivoresuggestsassociationswithpreydiversityandhostdensity
AT sallowstim crosscontinentalcomparisonofparasitecommunitiesinawiderangingcarnivoresuggestsassociationswithpreydiversityandhostdensity
AT smitsjuditeg crosscontinentalcomparisonofparasitecommunitiesinawiderangingcarnivoresuggestsassociationswithpreydiversityandhostdensity
AT bryanheatherm crosscontinentalcomparisonofparasitecommunitiesinawiderangingcarnivoresuggestsassociationswithpreydiversityandhostdensity