Cargando…

Sex differences in morphology across an expanding range edge in the flightless ground beetle, Carabus hortensis

1. Species’ ranges are dynamic, changing through range shifts, contractions, and expansions. Individuals at the edge of a species’ shifting range often possess morphological traits that increase movement capacity, that are not observed in individuals farther back within the species’ range. Although...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yarwood, Elisabeth, Drees, Claudia, Niven, Jeremy E., Gawel, Marisa, Schuett, Wiebke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7593
_version_ 1783732313595576320
author Yarwood, Elisabeth
Drees, Claudia
Niven, Jeremy E.
Gawel, Marisa
Schuett, Wiebke
author_facet Yarwood, Elisabeth
Drees, Claudia
Niven, Jeremy E.
Gawel, Marisa
Schuett, Wiebke
author_sort Yarwood, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description 1. Species’ ranges are dynamic, changing through range shifts, contractions, and expansions. Individuals at the edge of a species’ shifting range often possess morphological traits that increase movement capacity, that are not observed in individuals farther back within the species’ range. Although morphological traits that increase in proportion toward the range edge may differ between the sexes, such sex differences are rarely studied. 2. Here, we test the hypotheses that body size and condition increase with proximity to an expanding range edge in the flightless ground beetle, Carabus hortensis, and that these trait changes differ between the sexes. 3. Male, but not female, body size increased with proximity to the range edge. Body size was positively correlated with male front and mid tibia length and to female hind tibia length, indicating that body size is indicative of movement capacity in both sexes. Body condition (relative to body size) decreased with increasing population density in males but not females. Population density was lowest at the range edge. 4. Our results indicate that sex is an important factor influencing patterns in trait distribution across species’ ranges, and future studies should investigate changes in morphological traits across expanding range margins separately for males and females. We discuss the implications for sex differences in resource allocation and reproductive rates for trait differentiation across species’ shifting ranges.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8328432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83284322021-08-06 Sex differences in morphology across an expanding range edge in the flightless ground beetle, Carabus hortensis Yarwood, Elisabeth Drees, Claudia Niven, Jeremy E. Gawel, Marisa Schuett, Wiebke Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Species’ ranges are dynamic, changing through range shifts, contractions, and expansions. Individuals at the edge of a species’ shifting range often possess morphological traits that increase movement capacity, that are not observed in individuals farther back within the species’ range. Although morphological traits that increase in proportion toward the range edge may differ between the sexes, such sex differences are rarely studied. 2. Here, we test the hypotheses that body size and condition increase with proximity to an expanding range edge in the flightless ground beetle, Carabus hortensis, and that these trait changes differ between the sexes. 3. Male, but not female, body size increased with proximity to the range edge. Body size was positively correlated with male front and mid tibia length and to female hind tibia length, indicating that body size is indicative of movement capacity in both sexes. Body condition (relative to body size) decreased with increasing population density in males but not females. Population density was lowest at the range edge. 4. Our results indicate that sex is an important factor influencing patterns in trait distribution across species’ ranges, and future studies should investigate changes in morphological traits across expanding range margins separately for males and females. We discuss the implications for sex differences in resource allocation and reproductive rates for trait differentiation across species’ shifting ranges. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8328432/ /pubmed/34367551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7593 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yarwood, Elisabeth
Drees, Claudia
Niven, Jeremy E.
Gawel, Marisa
Schuett, Wiebke
Sex differences in morphology across an expanding range edge in the flightless ground beetle, Carabus hortensis
title Sex differences in morphology across an expanding range edge in the flightless ground beetle, Carabus hortensis
title_full Sex differences in morphology across an expanding range edge in the flightless ground beetle, Carabus hortensis
title_fullStr Sex differences in morphology across an expanding range edge in the flightless ground beetle, Carabus hortensis
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in morphology across an expanding range edge in the flightless ground beetle, Carabus hortensis
title_short Sex differences in morphology across an expanding range edge in the flightless ground beetle, Carabus hortensis
title_sort sex differences in morphology across an expanding range edge in the flightless ground beetle, carabus hortensis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7593
work_keys_str_mv AT yarwoodelisabeth sexdifferencesinmorphologyacrossanexpandingrangeedgeintheflightlessgroundbeetlecarabushortensis
AT dreesclaudia sexdifferencesinmorphologyacrossanexpandingrangeedgeintheflightlessgroundbeetlecarabushortensis
AT nivenjeremye sexdifferencesinmorphologyacrossanexpandingrangeedgeintheflightlessgroundbeetlecarabushortensis
AT gawelmarisa sexdifferencesinmorphologyacrossanexpandingrangeedgeintheflightlessgroundbeetlecarabushortensis
AT schuettwiebke sexdifferencesinmorphologyacrossanexpandingrangeedgeintheflightlessgroundbeetlecarabushortensis