Cargando…
Freshwater wild biota exposure to microplastics: A global perspective
1. Current understanding on the exposure of freshwater organisms to microplastics (plastics sized between 1 µm and 5 mm) has arisen mostly from laboratory experiments—often conducted under artificial circumstances and with unrealistic concentrations. In order to improve scientific links through real...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7844 |
_version_ | 1783732316204433408 |
---|---|
author | Cera, Alessandra Scalici, Massimiliano |
author_facet | Cera, Alessandra Scalici, Massimiliano |
author_sort | Cera, Alessandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | 1. Current understanding on the exposure of freshwater organisms to microplastics (plastics sized between 1 µm and 5 mm) has arisen mostly from laboratory experiments—often conducted under artificial circumstances and with unrealistic concentrations. In order to improve scientific links through real ecosystem exposure, we review field data on the exposure of free‐living organisms to microplastics. 2. We highlight that the main outputs provided by field research are an assessment of the occurrence and, at times, the quantification of microplastics in different animal taxa. Topics of investigation also include the causes of contamination and the development of biological monitoring tools. With regard to taxa, fish, mollusks, and arthropods are at the center of the research, but birds and amphibians are also investigated. The ingestion or occurrence of microplastics in organs and tissues, such as livers and muscles, are the main data obtained. Microorganisms are studied differently than other taxa, highlighting interesting aspects on the freshwater plastisphere, for example, related to the structure and functionality of communities. Many taxa, that is, mammals, reptiles, and plants, are still under‐examined with regard to exposure to microplastics; this is surprising as they are generally endangered. 3. As biota contamination is acknowledged, we contribute to an interdisciplinary scientific discussion aimed at a better assessment of knowledge gaps on methodology, impact assessment, and monitoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8328441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83284412021-08-06 Freshwater wild biota exposure to microplastics: A global perspective Cera, Alessandra Scalici, Massimiliano Ecol Evol Review 1. Current understanding on the exposure of freshwater organisms to microplastics (plastics sized between 1 µm and 5 mm) has arisen mostly from laboratory experiments—often conducted under artificial circumstances and with unrealistic concentrations. In order to improve scientific links through real ecosystem exposure, we review field data on the exposure of free‐living organisms to microplastics. 2. We highlight that the main outputs provided by field research are an assessment of the occurrence and, at times, the quantification of microplastics in different animal taxa. Topics of investigation also include the causes of contamination and the development of biological monitoring tools. With regard to taxa, fish, mollusks, and arthropods are at the center of the research, but birds and amphibians are also investigated. The ingestion or occurrence of microplastics in organs and tissues, such as livers and muscles, are the main data obtained. Microorganisms are studied differently than other taxa, highlighting interesting aspects on the freshwater plastisphere, for example, related to the structure and functionality of communities. Many taxa, that is, mammals, reptiles, and plants, are still under‐examined with regard to exposure to microplastics; this is surprising as they are generally endangered. 3. As biota contamination is acknowledged, we contribute to an interdisciplinary scientific discussion aimed at a better assessment of knowledge gaps on methodology, impact assessment, and monitoring. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8328441/ /pubmed/34367548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7844 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Cera, Alessandra Scalici, Massimiliano Freshwater wild biota exposure to microplastics: A global perspective |
title | Freshwater wild biota exposure to microplastics: A global perspective |
title_full | Freshwater wild biota exposure to microplastics: A global perspective |
title_fullStr | Freshwater wild biota exposure to microplastics: A global perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Freshwater wild biota exposure to microplastics: A global perspective |
title_short | Freshwater wild biota exposure to microplastics: A global perspective |
title_sort | freshwater wild biota exposure to microplastics: a global perspective |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34367548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7844 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ceraalessandra freshwaterwildbiotaexposuretomicroplasticsaglobalperspective AT scalicimassimiliano freshwaterwildbiotaexposuretomicroplasticsaglobalperspective |