Cargando…

Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey

To evaluate the quality of radiation oncology training in Poland and to identify difficulties and needs of radiation oncology trainees (ROTs), an anonymous online survey using Google Forms was conducted in November 2018. All ROTs from Poland (n = 154) were invited to complete the survey. The survey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Napieralska, Aleksandra, Tomasik, Bartłomiej, Spałek, Mateusz, Chyrek, Artur, Fijuth, Jacek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32052261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01702-8
_version_ 1783732389760991232
author Napieralska, Aleksandra
Tomasik, Bartłomiej
Spałek, Mateusz
Chyrek, Artur
Fijuth, Jacek
author_facet Napieralska, Aleksandra
Tomasik, Bartłomiej
Spałek, Mateusz
Chyrek, Artur
Fijuth, Jacek
author_sort Napieralska, Aleksandra
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the quality of radiation oncology training in Poland and to identify difficulties and needs of radiation oncology trainees (ROTs), an anonymous online survey using Google Forms was conducted in November 2018. All ROTs from Poland (n = 154) were invited to complete the survey. The survey consisted of 30 questions and regarded aspects such as satisfaction from training, cooperation with the supervisor, and education. During the study period, 105 ROTs from 22 Polish cities responded (the response rate was 68%). Almost 85% were satisfied with the choice of specialty, 43% with training and 81% with the teaching place. Clinical cooperation with the supervisor was described as difficult by 25%. With education, 38% of responders experienced obstacles and another 25% stated that educational cooperation with their supervisor was none. “Good practice” understood as treatment according to the latest guidelines or internal protocols were reported by 71%. Obligatory traineeships were shorter than recommended according to 67% of the responders, usually due to shortage of medical staff. Almost two-thirds of ROTs work only in clinics, while 34% perform both clinical and scientific work. The responders suggested that the introduction of organ-specified courses is an appropriate modification of the current program. Noteworthy, current diagnostic imaging and physics courses are not sufficient for the majority of participants (81% and 80%, respectively). Radiation oncology training is conducted relatively well in Poland. Some hospitals need to improve clinical and educational cooperation between trainees and their supervisors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13187-020-01702-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8328852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83288522021-08-19 Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey Napieralska, Aleksandra Tomasik, Bartłomiej Spałek, Mateusz Chyrek, Artur Fijuth, Jacek J Cancer Educ Article To evaluate the quality of radiation oncology training in Poland and to identify difficulties and needs of radiation oncology trainees (ROTs), an anonymous online survey using Google Forms was conducted in November 2018. All ROTs from Poland (n = 154) were invited to complete the survey. The survey consisted of 30 questions and regarded aspects such as satisfaction from training, cooperation with the supervisor, and education. During the study period, 105 ROTs from 22 Polish cities responded (the response rate was 68%). Almost 85% were satisfied with the choice of specialty, 43% with training and 81% with the teaching place. Clinical cooperation with the supervisor was described as difficult by 25%. With education, 38% of responders experienced obstacles and another 25% stated that educational cooperation with their supervisor was none. “Good practice” understood as treatment according to the latest guidelines or internal protocols were reported by 71%. Obligatory traineeships were shorter than recommended according to 67% of the responders, usually due to shortage of medical staff. Almost two-thirds of ROTs work only in clinics, while 34% perform both clinical and scientific work. The responders suggested that the introduction of organ-specified courses is an appropriate modification of the current program. Noteworthy, current diagnostic imaging and physics courses are not sufficient for the majority of participants (81% and 80%, respectively). Radiation oncology training is conducted relatively well in Poland. Some hospitals need to improve clinical and educational cooperation between trainees and their supervisors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13187-020-01702-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-02-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8328852/ /pubmed/32052261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01702-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Napieralska, Aleksandra
Tomasik, Bartłomiej
Spałek, Mateusz
Chyrek, Artur
Fijuth, Jacek
Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey
title Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey
title_full Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey
title_fullStr Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey
title_full_unstemmed Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey
title_short Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey
title_sort radiation oncology training in poland: multi-institutional survey
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32052261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01702-8
work_keys_str_mv AT napieralskaaleksandra radiationoncologytraininginpolandmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT tomasikbartłomiej radiationoncologytraininginpolandmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT spałekmateusz radiationoncologytraininginpolandmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT chyrekartur radiationoncologytraininginpolandmultiinstitutionalsurvey
AT fijuthjacek radiationoncologytraininginpolandmultiinstitutionalsurvey