Cargando…
Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey
To evaluate the quality of radiation oncology training in Poland and to identify difficulties and needs of radiation oncology trainees (ROTs), an anonymous online survey using Google Forms was conducted in November 2018. All ROTs from Poland (n = 154) were invited to complete the survey. The survey...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32052261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01702-8 |
_version_ | 1783732389760991232 |
---|---|
author | Napieralska, Aleksandra Tomasik, Bartłomiej Spałek, Mateusz Chyrek, Artur Fijuth, Jacek |
author_facet | Napieralska, Aleksandra Tomasik, Bartłomiej Spałek, Mateusz Chyrek, Artur Fijuth, Jacek |
author_sort | Napieralska, Aleksandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate the quality of radiation oncology training in Poland and to identify difficulties and needs of radiation oncology trainees (ROTs), an anonymous online survey using Google Forms was conducted in November 2018. All ROTs from Poland (n = 154) were invited to complete the survey. The survey consisted of 30 questions and regarded aspects such as satisfaction from training, cooperation with the supervisor, and education. During the study period, 105 ROTs from 22 Polish cities responded (the response rate was 68%). Almost 85% were satisfied with the choice of specialty, 43% with training and 81% with the teaching place. Clinical cooperation with the supervisor was described as difficult by 25%. With education, 38% of responders experienced obstacles and another 25% stated that educational cooperation with their supervisor was none. “Good practice” understood as treatment according to the latest guidelines or internal protocols were reported by 71%. Obligatory traineeships were shorter than recommended according to 67% of the responders, usually due to shortage of medical staff. Almost two-thirds of ROTs work only in clinics, while 34% perform both clinical and scientific work. The responders suggested that the introduction of organ-specified courses is an appropriate modification of the current program. Noteworthy, current diagnostic imaging and physics courses are not sufficient for the majority of participants (81% and 80%, respectively). Radiation oncology training is conducted relatively well in Poland. Some hospitals need to improve clinical and educational cooperation between trainees and their supervisors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13187-020-01702-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8328852 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83288522021-08-19 Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey Napieralska, Aleksandra Tomasik, Bartłomiej Spałek, Mateusz Chyrek, Artur Fijuth, Jacek J Cancer Educ Article To evaluate the quality of radiation oncology training in Poland and to identify difficulties and needs of radiation oncology trainees (ROTs), an anonymous online survey using Google Forms was conducted in November 2018. All ROTs from Poland (n = 154) were invited to complete the survey. The survey consisted of 30 questions and regarded aspects such as satisfaction from training, cooperation with the supervisor, and education. During the study period, 105 ROTs from 22 Polish cities responded (the response rate was 68%). Almost 85% were satisfied with the choice of specialty, 43% with training and 81% with the teaching place. Clinical cooperation with the supervisor was described as difficult by 25%. With education, 38% of responders experienced obstacles and another 25% stated that educational cooperation with their supervisor was none. “Good practice” understood as treatment according to the latest guidelines or internal protocols were reported by 71%. Obligatory traineeships were shorter than recommended according to 67% of the responders, usually due to shortage of medical staff. Almost two-thirds of ROTs work only in clinics, while 34% perform both clinical and scientific work. The responders suggested that the introduction of organ-specified courses is an appropriate modification of the current program. Noteworthy, current diagnostic imaging and physics courses are not sufficient for the majority of participants (81% and 80%, respectively). Radiation oncology training is conducted relatively well in Poland. Some hospitals need to improve clinical and educational cooperation between trainees and their supervisors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s13187-020-01702-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-02-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8328852/ /pubmed/32052261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01702-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Napieralska, Aleksandra Tomasik, Bartłomiej Spałek, Mateusz Chyrek, Artur Fijuth, Jacek Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey |
title | Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey |
title_full | Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey |
title_fullStr | Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey |
title_short | Radiation Oncology Training in Poland: Multi-institutional Survey |
title_sort | radiation oncology training in poland: multi-institutional survey |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32052261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01702-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT napieralskaaleksandra radiationoncologytraininginpolandmultiinstitutionalsurvey AT tomasikbartłomiej radiationoncologytraininginpolandmultiinstitutionalsurvey AT spałekmateusz radiationoncologytraininginpolandmultiinstitutionalsurvey AT chyrekartur radiationoncologytraininginpolandmultiinstitutionalsurvey AT fijuthjacek radiationoncologytraininginpolandmultiinstitutionalsurvey |