Cargando…

State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States

BACKGROUND: Annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose chest computed tomography in older current and former smokers (ie, eligible adults) has been recommended since 2013. Uptake has been slow and variable across the United States. We estimated the LCS rate and growth at the national and state...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fedewa, Stacey A, Kazerooni, Ella A, Studts, Jamie L, Smith, Robert A, Bandi, Priti, Sauer, Ann Goding, Cotter, Megan, Sineshaw, Helmneh M, Jemal, Ahmedin, Silvestri, Gerard A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa170
_version_ 1783732401578442752
author Fedewa, Stacey A
Kazerooni, Ella A
Studts, Jamie L
Smith, Robert A
Bandi, Priti
Sauer, Ann Goding
Cotter, Megan
Sineshaw, Helmneh M
Jemal, Ahmedin
Silvestri, Gerard A
author_facet Fedewa, Stacey A
Kazerooni, Ella A
Studts, Jamie L
Smith, Robert A
Bandi, Priti
Sauer, Ann Goding
Cotter, Megan
Sineshaw, Helmneh M
Jemal, Ahmedin
Silvestri, Gerard A
author_sort Fedewa, Stacey A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose chest computed tomography in older current and former smokers (ie, eligible adults) has been recommended since 2013. Uptake has been slow and variable across the United States. We estimated the LCS rate and growth at the national and state level between 2016 and 2018. METHODS: The American College of Radiology’s Lung Cancer Screening Registry was used to capture screening events. Population-based surveys, the US Census, and cancer registry data were used to estimate the number of eligible adults and lung cancer mortality (ie, burden). Lung cancer screening rates (SRs) in eligible adults and screening rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure changes by state and year. RESULTS: Nationally, the SR was steady between 2016 (3.3%, 95% CI = 3.3% to 3.7%) and 2017 (3.4%, 95% CI = 3.4% to 3.9%), increasing to 5.0% (95% CI = 5.0% to 5.7%) in 2018 (2018 vs 2016 SR ratio = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.51 to 1.62). In 2018, several southern states with a high lung-cancer burden (eg, Mississippi, West Virginia, and Arkansas) had relatively low SRs (<4%) among eligible adults, whereas several northeastern states with lower lung cancer burden (eg, Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire) had the highest SRs (12.8%-15.2%). The exception was Kentucky, which had the nation’s highest lung cancer mortality rate and one of the highest SRs (13.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 1 in 20 eligible adults received LCS nationally, and uptake varied widely across states. LCS rates were not aligned with lung cancer burden across states, except for Kentucky, which has supported comprehensive efforts to implement LCS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8328984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83289842021-08-03 State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States Fedewa, Stacey A Kazerooni, Ella A Studts, Jamie L Smith, Robert A Bandi, Priti Sauer, Ann Goding Cotter, Megan Sineshaw, Helmneh M Jemal, Ahmedin Silvestri, Gerard A J Natl Cancer Inst Articles BACKGROUND: Annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose chest computed tomography in older current and former smokers (ie, eligible adults) has been recommended since 2013. Uptake has been slow and variable across the United States. We estimated the LCS rate and growth at the national and state level between 2016 and 2018. METHODS: The American College of Radiology’s Lung Cancer Screening Registry was used to capture screening events. Population-based surveys, the US Census, and cancer registry data were used to estimate the number of eligible adults and lung cancer mortality (ie, burden). Lung cancer screening rates (SRs) in eligible adults and screening rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure changes by state and year. RESULTS: Nationally, the SR was steady between 2016 (3.3%, 95% CI = 3.3% to 3.7%) and 2017 (3.4%, 95% CI = 3.4% to 3.9%), increasing to 5.0% (95% CI = 5.0% to 5.7%) in 2018 (2018 vs 2016 SR ratio = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.51 to 1.62). In 2018, several southern states with a high lung-cancer burden (eg, Mississippi, West Virginia, and Arkansas) had relatively low SRs (<4%) among eligible adults, whereas several northeastern states with lower lung cancer burden (eg, Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire) had the highest SRs (12.8%-15.2%). The exception was Kentucky, which had the nation’s highest lung cancer mortality rate and one of the highest SRs (13.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 1 in 20 eligible adults received LCS nationally, and uptake varied widely across states. LCS rates were not aligned with lung cancer burden across states, except for Kentucky, which has supported comprehensive efforts to implement LCS. Oxford University Press 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8328984/ /pubmed/33176362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa170 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Articles
Fedewa, Stacey A
Kazerooni, Ella A
Studts, Jamie L
Smith, Robert A
Bandi, Priti
Sauer, Ann Goding
Cotter, Megan
Sineshaw, Helmneh M
Jemal, Ahmedin
Silvestri, Gerard A
State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States
title State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States
title_full State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States
title_fullStr State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States
title_full_unstemmed State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States
title_short State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States
title_sort state variation in low-dose computed tomography scanning for lung cancer screening in the united states
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa170
work_keys_str_mv AT fedewastaceya statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT kazerooniellaa statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT studtsjamiel statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT smithroberta statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT bandipriti statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT saueranngoding statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT cottermegan statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT sineshawhelmnehm statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT jemalahmedin statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates
AT silvestrigerarda statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates