Cargando…
State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States
BACKGROUND: Annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose chest computed tomography in older current and former smokers (ie, eligible adults) has been recommended since 2013. Uptake has been slow and variable across the United States. We estimated the LCS rate and growth at the national and state...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa170 |
_version_ | 1783732401578442752 |
---|---|
author | Fedewa, Stacey A Kazerooni, Ella A Studts, Jamie L Smith, Robert A Bandi, Priti Sauer, Ann Goding Cotter, Megan Sineshaw, Helmneh M Jemal, Ahmedin Silvestri, Gerard A |
author_facet | Fedewa, Stacey A Kazerooni, Ella A Studts, Jamie L Smith, Robert A Bandi, Priti Sauer, Ann Goding Cotter, Megan Sineshaw, Helmneh M Jemal, Ahmedin Silvestri, Gerard A |
author_sort | Fedewa, Stacey A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose chest computed tomography in older current and former smokers (ie, eligible adults) has been recommended since 2013. Uptake has been slow and variable across the United States. We estimated the LCS rate and growth at the national and state level between 2016 and 2018. METHODS: The American College of Radiology’s Lung Cancer Screening Registry was used to capture screening events. Population-based surveys, the US Census, and cancer registry data were used to estimate the number of eligible adults and lung cancer mortality (ie, burden). Lung cancer screening rates (SRs) in eligible adults and screening rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure changes by state and year. RESULTS: Nationally, the SR was steady between 2016 (3.3%, 95% CI = 3.3% to 3.7%) and 2017 (3.4%, 95% CI = 3.4% to 3.9%), increasing to 5.0% (95% CI = 5.0% to 5.7%) in 2018 (2018 vs 2016 SR ratio = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.51 to 1.62). In 2018, several southern states with a high lung-cancer burden (eg, Mississippi, West Virginia, and Arkansas) had relatively low SRs (<4%) among eligible adults, whereas several northeastern states with lower lung cancer burden (eg, Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire) had the highest SRs (12.8%-15.2%). The exception was Kentucky, which had the nation’s highest lung cancer mortality rate and one of the highest SRs (13.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 1 in 20 eligible adults received LCS nationally, and uptake varied widely across states. LCS rates were not aligned with lung cancer burden across states, except for Kentucky, which has supported comprehensive efforts to implement LCS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8328984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83289842021-08-03 State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States Fedewa, Stacey A Kazerooni, Ella A Studts, Jamie L Smith, Robert A Bandi, Priti Sauer, Ann Goding Cotter, Megan Sineshaw, Helmneh M Jemal, Ahmedin Silvestri, Gerard A J Natl Cancer Inst Articles BACKGROUND: Annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose chest computed tomography in older current and former smokers (ie, eligible adults) has been recommended since 2013. Uptake has been slow and variable across the United States. We estimated the LCS rate and growth at the national and state level between 2016 and 2018. METHODS: The American College of Radiology’s Lung Cancer Screening Registry was used to capture screening events. Population-based surveys, the US Census, and cancer registry data were used to estimate the number of eligible adults and lung cancer mortality (ie, burden). Lung cancer screening rates (SRs) in eligible adults and screening rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure changes by state and year. RESULTS: Nationally, the SR was steady between 2016 (3.3%, 95% CI = 3.3% to 3.7%) and 2017 (3.4%, 95% CI = 3.4% to 3.9%), increasing to 5.0% (95% CI = 5.0% to 5.7%) in 2018 (2018 vs 2016 SR ratio = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.51 to 1.62). In 2018, several southern states with a high lung-cancer burden (eg, Mississippi, West Virginia, and Arkansas) had relatively low SRs (<4%) among eligible adults, whereas several northeastern states with lower lung cancer burden (eg, Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire) had the highest SRs (12.8%-15.2%). The exception was Kentucky, which had the nation’s highest lung cancer mortality rate and one of the highest SRs (13.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 1 in 20 eligible adults received LCS nationally, and uptake varied widely across states. LCS rates were not aligned with lung cancer burden across states, except for Kentucky, which has supported comprehensive efforts to implement LCS. Oxford University Press 2020-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8328984/ /pubmed/33176362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa170 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Articles Fedewa, Stacey A Kazerooni, Ella A Studts, Jamie L Smith, Robert A Bandi, Priti Sauer, Ann Goding Cotter, Megan Sineshaw, Helmneh M Jemal, Ahmedin Silvestri, Gerard A State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States |
title | State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States |
title_full | State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States |
title_fullStr | State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States |
title_short | State Variation in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Scanning for Lung Cancer Screening in the United States |
title_sort | state variation in low-dose computed tomography scanning for lung cancer screening in the united states |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8328984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33176362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fedewastaceya statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates AT kazerooniellaa statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates AT studtsjamiel statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates AT smithroberta statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates AT bandipriti statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates AT saueranngoding statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates AT cottermegan statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates AT sineshawhelmnehm statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates AT jemalahmedin statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates AT silvestrigerarda statevariationinlowdosecomputedtomographyscanningforlungcancerscreeningintheunitedstates |