Cargando…

Comparison of different approaches to estimate bark volume of industrial wood at disc and log scale

Within the wood supply chain, the measurement of roundwood plays a key role due to its high economic impact. While wood industry mainly processes the solid wood, the bark mostly remains as an industrial by-product. In Central Europe, it is common that the wood is sold over bark but that the price is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berendt, Ferréol, de Miguel-Diez, Felipe, Wallor, Evelyn, Blasko, Lubomir, Cremer, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34341442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95188-z
_version_ 1783732421609390080
author Berendt, Ferréol
de Miguel-Diez, Felipe
Wallor, Evelyn
Blasko, Lubomir
Cremer, Tobias
author_facet Berendt, Ferréol
de Miguel-Diez, Felipe
Wallor, Evelyn
Blasko, Lubomir
Cremer, Tobias
author_sort Berendt, Ferréol
collection PubMed
description Within the wood supply chain, the measurement of roundwood plays a key role due to its high economic impact. While wood industry mainly processes the solid wood, the bark mostly remains as an industrial by-product. In Central Europe, it is common that the wood is sold over bark but that the price is calculated on a timber volume under bark. However, logs are often measured as stacks and, thus, the volume includes not only the solid wood content but also the bark portion. Mostly, the deduction factors used to estimate the solid wood content are based on bark thickness. The aim of this study was to compare the estimation of bark volume from scaling formulae with the real bark volume, obtained by xylometric technique. Moreover, the measurements were performed using logs under practice conditions and using discs under laboratory conditions. The mean bark volume was 6.9 dm(3) and 26.4 cm(3) for the Norway spruce logs and the Scots pine discs respectively. Whereas the results showed good performances regarding the root mean square error, the coefficient of determination (R(2)) and the mean absolute error for the volume estimation of the total volume of discs and logs (over bark), the performances were much lower for the bark volume estimations only.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8329065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83290652021-08-03 Comparison of different approaches to estimate bark volume of industrial wood at disc and log scale Berendt, Ferréol de Miguel-Diez, Felipe Wallor, Evelyn Blasko, Lubomir Cremer, Tobias Sci Rep Article Within the wood supply chain, the measurement of roundwood plays a key role due to its high economic impact. While wood industry mainly processes the solid wood, the bark mostly remains as an industrial by-product. In Central Europe, it is common that the wood is sold over bark but that the price is calculated on a timber volume under bark. However, logs are often measured as stacks and, thus, the volume includes not only the solid wood content but also the bark portion. Mostly, the deduction factors used to estimate the solid wood content are based on bark thickness. The aim of this study was to compare the estimation of bark volume from scaling formulae with the real bark volume, obtained by xylometric technique. Moreover, the measurements were performed using logs under practice conditions and using discs under laboratory conditions. The mean bark volume was 6.9 dm(3) and 26.4 cm(3) for the Norway spruce logs and the Scots pine discs respectively. Whereas the results showed good performances regarding the root mean square error, the coefficient of determination (R(2)) and the mean absolute error for the volume estimation of the total volume of discs and logs (over bark), the performances were much lower for the bark volume estimations only. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8329065/ /pubmed/34341442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95188-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Berendt, Ferréol
de Miguel-Diez, Felipe
Wallor, Evelyn
Blasko, Lubomir
Cremer, Tobias
Comparison of different approaches to estimate bark volume of industrial wood at disc and log scale
title Comparison of different approaches to estimate bark volume of industrial wood at disc and log scale
title_full Comparison of different approaches to estimate bark volume of industrial wood at disc and log scale
title_fullStr Comparison of different approaches to estimate bark volume of industrial wood at disc and log scale
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different approaches to estimate bark volume of industrial wood at disc and log scale
title_short Comparison of different approaches to estimate bark volume of industrial wood at disc and log scale
title_sort comparison of different approaches to estimate bark volume of industrial wood at disc and log scale
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34341442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95188-z
work_keys_str_mv AT berendtferreol comparisonofdifferentapproachestoestimatebarkvolumeofindustrialwoodatdiscandlogscale
AT demigueldiezfelipe comparisonofdifferentapproachestoestimatebarkvolumeofindustrialwoodatdiscandlogscale
AT wallorevelyn comparisonofdifferentapproachestoestimatebarkvolumeofindustrialwoodatdiscandlogscale
AT blaskolubomir comparisonofdifferentapproachestoestimatebarkvolumeofindustrialwoodatdiscandlogscale
AT cremertobias comparisonofdifferentapproachestoestimatebarkvolumeofindustrialwoodatdiscandlogscale