Cargando…
Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model
PURPOSE: (1) To evaluate the biomechanical properties of a porcine flexor digitorum superficialis tendon graft with preserved muscle fibers and (2) to compare these results with the biomechanical properties of a porcine tendon graft after removal of associated muscle. METHODS: Eighty-two porcine for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34341872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00375-6 |
_version_ | 1783732432310108160 |
---|---|
author | Funchal, Luis Fernando Zukanovich Astur, Diego Costa Pizzolatti, André Luiz Almeida Grimaldi, Arthur Paiva Jimenez, Andrew Esteban Moré, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo de Mello Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo Cohen, Moises |
author_facet | Funchal, Luis Fernando Zukanovich Astur, Diego Costa Pizzolatti, André Luiz Almeida Grimaldi, Arthur Paiva Jimenez, Andrew Esteban Moré, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo de Mello Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo Cohen, Moises |
author_sort | Funchal, Luis Fernando Zukanovich |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: (1) To evaluate the biomechanical properties of a porcine flexor digitorum superficialis tendon graft with preserved muscle fibers and (2) to compare these results with the biomechanical properties of a porcine tendon graft after removal of associated muscle. METHODS: Eighty-two porcine forelegs were dissected and the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle tendons were harvested. The study comprised of two groups: Group 1 (G1), harvested tendon with preserved muscle tissue; and Group 2 (G2), harvested contralateral tendon with removal of all muscle tissue. Tests in both groups were conducted using an electro-mechanical material testing machine (Instron, model 23-5S, Instron Corp., Canton, MA, USA) with a 500 N force transducer. Yield load, stiffness, and maximum load were evaluated and compared between groups. RESULTS: The behavior of the autografts during the tests followed the same stretching, deformation, and failure patterns as those observed in human autografts subjected to axial strain. There were no significant differences in the comparison between groups for ultimate load to failure (p = 0.105), stiffness (p = 0.097), and energy (p = 0.761). CONCLUSION: In this porcine model biomechanical study, using autograft tendon with preserved muscle showed no statistically significant differences for yield load, stiffness, or maximum load compared to autograft tendon without preserved muscle. The preservation of muscle on the autograft tendon did not compromise the mechanical properties of the autograft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Controlled laboratory study |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8329107 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83291072021-08-20 Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model Funchal, Luis Fernando Zukanovich Astur, Diego Costa Pizzolatti, André Luiz Almeida Grimaldi, Arthur Paiva Jimenez, Andrew Esteban Moré, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo de Mello Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo Cohen, Moises J Exp Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: (1) To evaluate the biomechanical properties of a porcine flexor digitorum superficialis tendon graft with preserved muscle fibers and (2) to compare these results with the biomechanical properties of a porcine tendon graft after removal of associated muscle. METHODS: Eighty-two porcine forelegs were dissected and the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle tendons were harvested. The study comprised of two groups: Group 1 (G1), harvested tendon with preserved muscle tissue; and Group 2 (G2), harvested contralateral tendon with removal of all muscle tissue. Tests in both groups were conducted using an electro-mechanical material testing machine (Instron, model 23-5S, Instron Corp., Canton, MA, USA) with a 500 N force transducer. Yield load, stiffness, and maximum load were evaluated and compared between groups. RESULTS: The behavior of the autografts during the tests followed the same stretching, deformation, and failure patterns as those observed in human autografts subjected to axial strain. There were no significant differences in the comparison between groups for ultimate load to failure (p = 0.105), stiffness (p = 0.097), and energy (p = 0.761). CONCLUSION: In this porcine model biomechanical study, using autograft tendon with preserved muscle showed no statistically significant differences for yield load, stiffness, or maximum load compared to autograft tendon without preserved muscle. The preservation of muscle on the autograft tendon did not compromise the mechanical properties of the autograft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Controlled laboratory study Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8329107/ /pubmed/34341872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00375-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Funchal, Luis Fernando Zukanovich Astur, Diego Costa Pizzolatti, André Luiz Almeida Grimaldi, Arthur Paiva Jimenez, Andrew Esteban Moré, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo de Mello Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo Cohen, Moises Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model |
title | Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model |
title_full | Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model |
title_fullStr | Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model |
title_full_unstemmed | Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model |
title_short | Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model |
title_sort | tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329107/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34341872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00375-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT funchalluisfernandozukanovich tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel AT asturdiegocosta tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel AT pizzolattiandreluizalmeida tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel AT grimaldiarthurpaiva tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel AT jimenezandrewesteban tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel AT morearidigiacomoocampo tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel AT demelloroeslercarlosrodrigo tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel AT cohenmoises tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel |