Cargando…

Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model

PURPOSE: (1) To evaluate the biomechanical properties of a porcine flexor digitorum superficialis tendon graft with preserved muscle fibers and (2) to compare these results with the biomechanical properties of a porcine tendon graft after removal of associated muscle. METHODS: Eighty-two porcine for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Funchal, Luis Fernando Zukanovich, Astur, Diego Costa, Pizzolatti, André Luiz Almeida, Grimaldi, Arthur Paiva, Jimenez, Andrew Esteban, Moré, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo, de Mello Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo, Cohen, Moises
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34341872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00375-6
_version_ 1783732432310108160
author Funchal, Luis Fernando Zukanovich
Astur, Diego Costa
Pizzolatti, André Luiz Almeida
Grimaldi, Arthur Paiva
Jimenez, Andrew Esteban
Moré, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo
de Mello Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo
Cohen, Moises
author_facet Funchal, Luis Fernando Zukanovich
Astur, Diego Costa
Pizzolatti, André Luiz Almeida
Grimaldi, Arthur Paiva
Jimenez, Andrew Esteban
Moré, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo
de Mello Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo
Cohen, Moises
author_sort Funchal, Luis Fernando Zukanovich
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: (1) To evaluate the biomechanical properties of a porcine flexor digitorum superficialis tendon graft with preserved muscle fibers and (2) to compare these results with the biomechanical properties of a porcine tendon graft after removal of associated muscle. METHODS: Eighty-two porcine forelegs were dissected and the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle tendons were harvested. The study comprised of two groups: Group 1 (G1), harvested tendon with preserved muscle tissue; and Group 2 (G2), harvested contralateral tendon with removal of all muscle tissue. Tests in both groups were conducted using an electro-mechanical material testing machine (Instron, model 23-5S, Instron Corp., Canton, MA, USA) with a 500 N force transducer. Yield load, stiffness, and maximum load were evaluated and compared between groups. RESULTS: The behavior of the autografts during the tests followed the same stretching, deformation, and failure patterns as those observed in human autografts subjected to axial strain. There were no significant differences in the comparison between groups for ultimate load to failure (p = 0.105), stiffness (p = 0.097), and energy (p = 0.761). CONCLUSION: In this porcine model biomechanical study, using autograft tendon with preserved muscle showed no statistically significant differences for yield load, stiffness, or maximum load compared to autograft tendon without preserved muscle. The preservation of muscle on the autograft tendon did not compromise the mechanical properties of the autograft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Controlled laboratory study
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8329107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83291072021-08-20 Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model Funchal, Luis Fernando Zukanovich Astur, Diego Costa Pizzolatti, André Luiz Almeida Grimaldi, Arthur Paiva Jimenez, Andrew Esteban Moré, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo de Mello Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo Cohen, Moises J Exp Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: (1) To evaluate the biomechanical properties of a porcine flexor digitorum superficialis tendon graft with preserved muscle fibers and (2) to compare these results with the biomechanical properties of a porcine tendon graft after removal of associated muscle. METHODS: Eighty-two porcine forelegs were dissected and the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle tendons were harvested. The study comprised of two groups: Group 1 (G1), harvested tendon with preserved muscle tissue; and Group 2 (G2), harvested contralateral tendon with removal of all muscle tissue. Tests in both groups were conducted using an electro-mechanical material testing machine (Instron, model 23-5S, Instron Corp., Canton, MA, USA) with a 500 N force transducer. Yield load, stiffness, and maximum load were evaluated and compared between groups. RESULTS: The behavior of the autografts during the tests followed the same stretching, deformation, and failure patterns as those observed in human autografts subjected to axial strain. There were no significant differences in the comparison between groups for ultimate load to failure (p = 0.105), stiffness (p = 0.097), and energy (p = 0.761). CONCLUSION: In this porcine model biomechanical study, using autograft tendon with preserved muscle showed no statistically significant differences for yield load, stiffness, or maximum load compared to autograft tendon without preserved muscle. The preservation of muscle on the autograft tendon did not compromise the mechanical properties of the autograft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Controlled laboratory study Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8329107/ /pubmed/34341872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00375-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Funchal, Luis Fernando Zukanovich
Astur, Diego Costa
Pizzolatti, André Luiz Almeida
Grimaldi, Arthur Paiva
Jimenez, Andrew Esteban
Moré, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo
de Mello Roesler, Carlos Rodrigo
Cohen, Moises
Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model
title Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model
title_full Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model
title_fullStr Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model
title_full_unstemmed Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model
title_short Tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model
title_sort tendon grafts with preserved muscle demonstrate similar biomechanical properties to tendon grafts stripped of muscular attachments: a biomechanical evaluation in a porcine model
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8329107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34341872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00375-6
work_keys_str_mv AT funchalluisfernandozukanovich tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel
AT asturdiegocosta tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel
AT pizzolattiandreluizalmeida tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel
AT grimaldiarthurpaiva tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel
AT jimenezandrewesteban tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel
AT morearidigiacomoocampo tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel
AT demelloroeslercarlosrodrigo tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel
AT cohenmoises tendongraftswithpreservedmuscledemonstratesimilarbiomechanicalpropertiestotendongraftsstrippedofmuscularattachmentsabiomechanicalevaluationinaporcinemodel